Full paper PDF
Saudi University Students’ Perceptions towards Virtual Education During Covid-19
Pandemic: A Case Study of Language Learning via Blackboard
Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts,
Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
Following the spread of COVID-19, many parts of the world have fully shifted to virtual education. Issues regarding students’ readiness for this mode of education have been the main concerns in countries where students are not used to virtual classes. This article presents a case study that investigated the perceptions of Saudi university students towards learning via Blackboard, during the unusual mode of delivering education caused by Covid-19. The aim was to identify the merits and challenges of online learning in order to understand the students’ learning experiences during the pandemic period and suggest practical solutions. The participants were 25 university students majoring in the English language at the bachelor of arts level. The instructor (the author) taught them classes on morphology. Based on an analysis of the students’ learning logs, the students preferred the asynchronous environment to the synchronous one due to its flexibility. However, unlike research findings identified in relevant studies on virtual education for language learning, the present study reveals that virtual education is not always appealing for students. This study is one of the few studies that compare the synchronous and asynchronous aspects of BB in the Arabian contexts. It is hoped that this study will help university authorities to set out more practical educational plans in the case of emergencies. Also, this study will inform the practices of university instructors and designers of professional development courses in the near future.
Keywords: blackboard, language learning, perceptions, Saudi university students, virtual educationCite as: Al-Nofaie, H. (2020). Saudi University Students’ Perceptions towards Virtual Education During Covid-19 Pandemic: A Case Study of Language Learning via Blackboard. Arab World English Journal, 11 (3) 4-20.
Ali, J. (2017). Blackboard as a motivator for Saudi EFL students: A psycholinguistic study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(5), 144–151. Doi:10.5539/ijel.v7n5p144
Alkhazim, M. A. (2020). Distance education is more than blackboard. Al-Jazirah, 5 May . Available at: http://www.al-jazirah.com/2020/20200405/ln22.htm
Al-Mubireek, A. (2019). E-learning in the english classroom: Comparing two e-learning platforms impacting preparatory year students’ language learning. CALL-EJ, 20(2), 19–37.
Anas, A. (2020). Perceptions of Saudi Students to Blended Learning Environments at the University of Bisha, Saudi Arabia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6). 261-277. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.17
Bailey, D., Lee, A., & Vorst, T. (2018). An investigation of differences and changes in L2 writing anxiety between blended and conventional english language learning contexts. CALL-EJ , 18(1), 22–39.
Billing, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: cognitive skills. Higher Education, 53, 483–516. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-5628-5.
Chen, J., Dobinson, T., & Kent, S. (2020). Students’ Perspectives on the Impact of Blackboard Collaborate on Open University Australia (OUA) Online Learning. Journal of Educators Online, 17(1). Available at: https://www.thejeo.com/archive/2020_17_1/chenchiang_chendobinson__kent
Cornelius, S. (2014). Facilitating in a demanding environment: Experiences of teaching in virtual classrooms using web conferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 260–271. Doi:10.1111/bjet.12016
Duff, P. (2008). Case Study Research in Applied Linguistics. New York, NY: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis.
Fageeh, A., & Mekheimer, M. (2013). Effects of BlackBoard on EFL academic writing and attitudes. JALT CALL Journal, 9(2), 169-196. DOI: 10.29140/jaltcall.v9n2.154
Gamble C (2018) Exploring EFL university students’ acceptance of e-learning using TAM. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 22, 23–37. Doi:http://hdl.handle.net/10236/00026403
Guo, S. (2013). Applying web-conferencing in a beginners’ Chinese class. In Proceedings of Electric Dreams. Proceedings ASCILITE 2013 Sydney (pp. 345–349). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib. org/p/171148/
Haskell, R. (2001). Transfer of Learning: Cognition, Instruction and Reasoning. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., & Beutel, D. (2011). Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(7), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n7.4
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55. Retrieved from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning#fn7
Huang, X. S., & Hsiao, E. L. (2012). Synchronous and asynchronous communication in an online environment: Faculty experiences and perceptions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 15–30. Retrieved from: https://www. learntechlib.org/p/131977
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). Beyond Methods: Macrostrategies for Language Teaching. London and New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lavar, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitemate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mc Brien, J. L., Jones, P. & Cheng, R. (2009). Virtual Spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(3), 1–17.
Miyake, N., & Kirschner. P. D. (2014). The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 418-438). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Morphy, L. (2008). Learning logs and strategy development for distance and other independent language learners. In S. Hurd, & T. Lewis (eds), Language Learning Strategies in Independent Settings (pp. 199-217). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Mroz, A. (2014). 21st Century virtual language learning environments (VLLEs). Language and Linguistics Compass, 8(8), 330–343. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12089
Ogbonna, C.G., Ibezim, N.E. & Obi, C.A. (2019). Synchronous versus asynchronous e-learning in teaching word-processing: An experimental approach. South African Journal of Education, 39(2).Doi: 10.15700/saje.v39n2a1383
Pusuluri, S., Mahasneh, A., & Alsayer, B. (2017) The application of blackboard in the english courses at Al Jouf University: perceptions of students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(2), 106–111. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0702.03
Reese, S. A. (2014). Online learning environments in higher education: Connectivism vs. dissociation. Education and Information Technologies, 20(3), 579–588. Doi:10.1007/ s10639-013-9303-7
Ross, J. (2020). Crisis-driven online exam shift ‘chance to boost academic integrity. Times higher education, Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/crisis-driven-online-exam-shift-chance-boost-academic-integrity
Rudd, D. P. II., & Rudd, D. P. (2014). The value of video in online instruction. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 13, 1–7.
Schwienhorst, K. (2002). Why virtual, why environments? Implementing virtual reality concepts in computer-assisted language learning. Simulation & Gaming, 33(2), 196–209.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102332008
Sfard, A. (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4–13.Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002004
Shaw, P. A. (2009). The syllabus is dead, long live the syllabus: thoughts on the state of language curriculum, content, language, tasks, projects, materials, wikis, blogs and the World Wide Web. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(5), 1266–1283. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2009.00154.x
Thompson, L., & Ku, H.Y. (2005). Chinese graduate students’ experiences and attitudes toward online learning. Educational Media International, 42(1), 33–47. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980500116878
Tunceren, L., Kaur, A., Mullins, C., & Slimp, M. (2015). Technology review: Personalizing the onlineenterprise of college learning through synchronous activity. The Community College Enterprise, 21(2), 103–106. Available at: https://www.schoolcraft.edu/cce/search-archives/362
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and higher education, 6, 77-90. Doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00164-1.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wilson, T., & Whitlock, D. (1998). Monitoring the online behavior of distance learning students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 91 – 99.
Zhao, N., & McDougall, D. E. (2008) Cultural influences on Chinese students’ asynchronous online learning in a Canadian university. Canadian Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 59–80. Doi: http://hdl.handle.net/1807/30067