Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number1 March 2020 Pp.432- 443
The Influence of Implementing Reciprocal Teaching in L2 Classes on Female Students’
Perception of their Reading Skills and Motivation to Read
Maysa Mohammad Sadiq Qutob
English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, KSA
Albayan Model School for Girls, Jeddah, KSA
This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of reciprocal teaching (RT) in improving high school female students’ attitudes toward reading in a second language as the results might shed light on effective teaching practices in the L2 classrooms. To this end, a self-report questionnaire was developed and validated by the researcher. A quasi-experimental design was used, whereby the study sample was divided into two groups, experimental and control. The experimental group was taught reading in English classes by means of RT strategies, whereas the matched control group was taught reading by means of traditional instructive techniques. Both groups completed the self-report questionnaire on reading skills and motivation during term time, ensuring that the participants in the experimental group completed the questionnaire within ten weeks of the intervention. The findings show significant correlations between RT strategies and both reading comprehension and motivation to read, and are also effective in improving students’ perception of their reading skills and motivation to read. Accordingly, the study recommends other researchers to investigate the effect of RT on students’ performance and considering implementing RT with the use of technology in English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms.
Keywords: clarifying, EFL, motivation, reading comprehension, predicting, questioning, reciprocal teaching, students’ perception, summarizing, teaching methodology, teaching strategies
Cite as: Qutob, M. M. S. (2020). The Influence of Implementing Reciprocal Teaching in L2 Classes on Female Students’ Perception of their Reading Skills and Motivation to Read. Arab World English Journal, 11 (1) 432- 443.
Ahmadi, M. R. & Gilakjani, A. P. (2012). Reciprocal teaching strategies and their impacts on English reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(10), 2053.
Ahmadi, M. R., Ismail, H. N., & Abdullah, M. K. K. (2013). The Importance of Metacognitive Reading Strategy Awareness in Reading Comprehension. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 235–244.
Al-Harby, J. S. S. (2016). The Effect of Reciprocal-Teaching Strategy on Learning Outcomes and Attitudes of Qassim-University Students in “Islamic Culture”. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(6), 213–231.
Ashegh, L. (2018). The Effects of Reciprocal Teaching on Reading Comprehension of Iranian EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(4), 26-30. DOI:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.4p.26
Bean, T. W., & Steenwyk, F. L. (1984). The effect of three forms of summarization instruction on sixth graders’ summary writing and comprehension. Journal of Literacy Research, 16(4), 297-306. DOI:10.1080/10862968409547523
Doctorow, M., Wittrock, M. C., & Marks, C. (1978). Generative processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(2), 109-118. DOI:10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206.
Gomaa, O. M. K. (2015). The Effect of Reciprocal Teaching Intervention Strategy on Reading Comprehension Skills of 5th Grade Elementary School Students with Reading Disabilities. Online Submission, 4(2), 39–45.
Graesser, A., & Lehman, B. (2011). Questions drive comprehension of text and multimedia. In M. T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 53-74). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Gulbinskienė, D. & Dubovičienė, T. (2015). Language Learning Motivation of EFL Students at LEU. Man & the Word/Zmogus ir zodis, 17(3).
Head, M. H., Readence, J. E., & Buss, R. R. (1989). An examination of summary writing as a measure of reading comprehension. Literacy Research and Instruction, 28(4), 1-11. DOI:10.1080/19388078909557982
Huang, C. T., & Yang, S. C. (2015). Effects of online reciprocal teaching on reading strategies, comprehension, self-efficacy, and motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 52(3), 381–407.
Ishiwa, K., Sanjose, V. & Otero, J. (2013). Questioning and reading goals: Information‐seeking questions asked on scientific texts read under different task conditions. Educational Psychology, 83(3), 502-520. DOI; 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02076.
Ilter, B. G. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(4).
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 440–464.
Liu, A. & Bu, Y. (2016). Reciprocal Learning Strategy in CALL Environment: A Case Study of EFL Teaching at X University in Shanghai. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(5), 1059–1070.
Mandel, E., Osana, H. P., & Venkatesh, V. (2013). Addressing the effects of reciprocal teaching on the receptive and expressive vocabulary of 1st-grade students. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27(4), 407–426.
McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J. P., & Schraw, G. (2010). Exploring how relevance instructions affect personal reading intentions, reading goals and text processing: A mixed-methods study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(4), 229-241. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.12.001.
Ninsuwan, P. (2015). The Effectiveness of Teaching English by Using Reading Aloud Technique towards EFL Beginners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1835–1840.
Palinscar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175.
Pilten, G. (2016). The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on Comprehension of Expository Texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(10), 232–247.
Ramsay, C. M., Sperling, S. A., & Dornisch, M. M. (2010). A comparison of the effects of students’ expository text comprehension strategies. Instruction Science, 38, 551-570. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-008-9081-6.
Reichenberg, M. & Kent, L. Ã. (2014). An intervention study in grade 3 based upon reciprocal teaching. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 8(2), 122–131.
Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. DOI:10.3102/00346543066002181.
Schünemann, N., Spörer, N., Völlinger, V. A., & Brunstein, J. C. (2017). Peer feedback mediates the impact of self-regulation procedures on strategy use and reading comprehension in reciprocal teaching groups. Instructional Science, 45(4), 395–415.
Sheng-Shiang Tseng & Hui-Chin Yeh (2018) Integrating reciprocal teaching in an online environment with an annotation feature to enhance low-achieving students’ English reading comprehension, Interactive Learning Environments, 26(6), 789-802. DOI:10.1080/10494820.2017.1412989
Soonthornmanee, R. (2002). The effect of the reciprocal teaching approach on the reading comprehension of EFL students. RELC Journal, 33(2), 125–141.
Soufi, N., Saad, K., & Nicolas, M. O. D. (2015). Blogs as a way to enhance EFL reading classes in a Lebanese tertiary institution. Teaching English with Technology, 15(1), 31–47.
Tarchi, C. & Pinto, G. (2016). Reciprocal teaching: Analyzing interactive dynamics in the co-construction of a text’s meaning. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 518–530.
Wang, Z., Sabatini, J., O’Reilly, O. & Feng, F. (2017). How individual differences interact with task demands in text processing. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(1) http://dx.DOI.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1276184.
Zablocki, M., Horn, B. R., & Cuenca-Carlino, Y. (2017) Effects of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on the Reading Comprehension of Adolescents at an Alternative School. Illinois Reading Council Journal, 45(2), 11–21.