Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, April 2024                                     Pp.112-123
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.7

Full Paper PDF

Locating the Intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Human English Writing
Skills: A Comparative Study

 Sadia Ali
Department of English Language and Literature
College of Science and Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Al-Kharj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Email: sad.ali@psau.edu.sa

 

Received:01/15/2024         Accepted:04/09/2024                 Published: 04/24/2024

 

 Abstract:
This paper offers a multi-dimensional comparative analysis of the linguistic characteristics found in the introduction sections of dissertations produced by ChatGPT and those written by Saudi authors. This research paper aims to analyze the linguistic variation in the introduction part of the dissertations written by Saudi writers compared with the introduction produced by ChatGPT. An extensive analysis of more than 150 linguistic features, including lexico-grammatical structures and semantic nuances, is performed using Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (MAT) tagger. A corpus of dissertation introductions written by Saudi students is compiled and analyzed. Furthermore, a corpus is created that comprises introductions produced by ChatGPT. The study investigates the relationship between language produced by AI and human-written content, revealing unique linguistic preferences. The results indicate ChatGPT is more informational, explicit and less non-narrative and non-argumentative than human-written introductions. There is a significant difference in discourse production on dimension five, as human-written introductions produce abstract and ChatGPT produces non-abstract discourse. The study is significant as it highlights the linguistic differences between the writing styles of ChatGPT and Saudi writers, indicating potential areas of improvement for AI-generated texts.
Keywords: academic writing, artificial intelligence, Chat GPT, human English writing, linguistic features,
Saudi writers 

Cite as:  Ali, A. (2024). Locating the Intersection of Generative Artificial Intelligence and Human English Writing Skills: A Comparative Study.  Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, April 2024: 112-123.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.7

References

Ahmed, M. A. (2023). ChatGPT and the EFL classroom: Supplement or substitute in Saudi Arabia’s eastern region. Information Sciences Letters, 12(7), 2727-2734. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120704

Ali, J. K. (2023). Benefits and Challenges of Using ChatGPT: An Exploratory Study on English Language Program. University of Bisha Journal for Humanities2(2), 629-641. https://www.researchgate.net/

Ali, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Exploring Lexico-grammatical patterns in Saudi press reportage: A multidimensional analysis. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/3wy7p

Alqasham, F. H. (2023). ChatGPT in the Saudi EFL Classroom: A Study of Learner Usage Patterns and Possibilities in Learning Optimization. Migration Letters20(7). https://doi.org/10.59670/ml.v20iS7.4828

Alshahrani, A. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on blended learning: Current trends and future research directions. International Journal of Data and Network Science7(4), 2029-2040. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.6.010 

Aslam, M., & Nisar, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence applications using ChatGPT in education: Case studies and practices: Case studies and practices. IGI Global.

Biber, D. (1991). Variation across speech and writing. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621024

Bilal, M. (2023). Become an Efficient Academic Writer with AI Apps. Published tutorial. https://efficientacademicwriter.carrd.co/

Bin-Hady, W. R., Al-Kadi, A., Hazaea, A., & Ali, J. K. (2023). Exploring the dimensions of ChatGPT in English language learning: A global perspective. Library Hi Techhttps://doi.org/10.1108/lht-05-2023-0200

Cao, Y., & Xiao, R. (2013). A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora8(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0041

ChatGPT and the EFL classroom: Supplement or substitute in Saudi Arabia’s eastern region. (2023). Information Sciences Letters12(7), 2727-2734. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120704

Cooper, K. (2021, November 1). OpenAI GPT-3: Everything you need to know. Springboardhttps://www.springboard.com/blog/data-science/machine-learning-gpt-3-open-ai/

Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & Römer, U. (2019). Examining lexical and cohesion differences in discipline-specific writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Multi-Dimensional Analysishttps://doi.org/10.5040/9781350023857.0019

Else, H. (2023). Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists. Nature613(7944), 423-423. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00056-7

Guizzardi, S., Colangelo, M. T., Mirandola, P., & Galli, C. (2023). Tracing the evolution of reviews and research articles in the biomedical literature: A multi-dimensional analysis of abstracts. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.2149.v1

Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E. (2016). Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes22, 119-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.03.002

Hutson, M. (2021). Robo-writers: The rise and risks of language-generating AI. Nature591(7848), 22-25. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-00530-0

Jin, B. (2021). A multi-dimensional analysis of research article discussion sections in an engineering discipline: Corpus explorations and scientists’ perceptions. SAGE Open11(4), 215824402110504. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211050401

Lingard, L. (2023). Writing with ChatGPT: An illustration of its capacity, limitations & Implications for academic writers. Perspectives on Medical Education12(1), 261-270. https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1072

Ma, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, Q. (2023). Exploring ChatGPT in language teaching for higher education in China. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media18(1), 265-271. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/18/20231337

Marzuki, Widiati, U., Rusdin, D., Darwin, & Indrawati, I. (2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organisation of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469

Pavlik, J. V. (2023). Collaborating with ChatGPT: Considering the implications of generative artificial intelligence for journalism and media education. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator78(1), 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776958221149579

Pérez-Paredes, P. (2019). The linguistic dimension of L2 interviews: A multidimensional analysis of native speaker language. Focus on ELT Journalhttps://doi.org/10.14744/felt.2019.00008

Spennemann, D. H. (2023). ChatGPT and the generation of digitally born “Knowledge”: How does a generative AI language model interpret cultural heritage values? Knowledge3(3). https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202307.0563.v1

Stokel-Walker, C. (2023). ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: Many scientists disapprove. Nature613(7945), 620-621. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z

Welborn, A. (2023, March 14). ChatGPT and fake citations. Duke University Libraries Blogshttps://blogs.library.duke.edu/blog/2023/03/09/chatgpt-and-fake-citations/

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 01/15/2024
Accepted: 04/09/2024  
Published: 04/24/2024 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-2909
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.7 

Sadia Ali received her PhD in Linguistics and Literature from Air University, Islamabad, Pakistan, and is currently working as an Assistant Professor at Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, KSA. Her research interests include linguistic variations, World Englishes, Corpus linguistics, genre studies, and discourse analysis. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0262-2909