Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number2 June 2020 Pp. 214-231
Effectiveness of Using Poly Category Mind Map for Vocabulary Development
Thashwinny a/p Prabha
Sk Kem Iskandar, Mersing,
Azlina Abdul Aziz
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,
Despite learning English formally in primary classrooms, most of the Malaysian primary learners are incapable of conveying their ideas accurately in the target language since they have limited vocabulary. Action research based on the Kemmis and McTaggart Action Research Model was carried out to alleviate the vocabulary learning challenges. Thus, the study aims are to investigate the effects of the Poly Category Mind Map for vocabulary development of third-year students. Thirty students from the third-year suburban school in Mersing, Johor participated in the study. Vocabulary pre-test and post-tests used as the instruments of collecting the data. The results of the post-test at the end of the second cycle showed a significant difference between the mean scores before and after using Poly Category Mind Map to develop vocabulary (p>0.05). The use of Poly Category Mind Mapping helped students in understanding and remembering the words, their meaning, and spelling precisely. The findings concluded that using the features of Poly Category Mind Map, which are the pictures, keywords, and grouping of words aided the students in learning vocabulary. This study hopes to encourage students, teachers, and curriculum designers to integrate Poly Category Mind Mapping strategy in English classrooms. Researchers can also utilise the Poly Category Mind Mapping in learning skills of the English Language such as reading and writing for further studies.
Keywords: Mind Map, Poly Category Mind Map, primary school students, vocabulary, vocabulary development
Cite as: Prabha, T.,& Abdul Aziz,A.(2020). Effectiveness of Using Poly Category Mind Map for Vocabulary Development. Arab World English Journal, 11 (2) 214- 231.
Abdul Aziz, A, & Yamat, H. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Technique in Increasing Students’ Vocabulary List. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4, 105-113.
Al Qahtani, M. (2015). The Importance of Vocabulary in Second Language Learning and How to be Taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3 (3), 21-34. doi:10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002.
Alharthi, T. (2014). Role of Vocabulary Learning Strategies in EFL Learners’ Word Attrition. International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 2(3), 13-28.
Asgari, A & Bin Mustapha, G (2010). The Type of Vocabulary Learning Strategies Use by ESL Students in University Putra Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 84-90. doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n2p84.
Buran, A., & Filyukov, A. (2015). Mind Mapping Technique in Language Learning. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 206, 215–218. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.010
Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The Mind Map Book: How to Use Radiant Thinking to Maximise Your Brain’s Untapped Potential. New York: Plume.
Buzan, T. (2016). The Buzan Study Skills Handbook the Short Cut to Success in Your Studies. BBC Life Style: London.
Cambridge University Press. (2008). Cambridge online dictionary, Cambridge Dictionary online. Retrieved from the website temoa: Open Educational Resources (OER) Portal at http://temoa.tec.mx/node/324
Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Method Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Creswell, J.W. 2012. Education reached: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative Research, Massachusetts: Pearson.
Dóczi, B. (2011). Comparing The Vocabulary Learning Strategies Of High School And University Students: A Pilot Study. Wopalp, 5, 138-158.
Folse, K. (2004). Vocabulary Myths. TESL-EJ, 8(4), 2. doi: 10.3998/mpub.23925
Goodnough, K. and Woods, R. (2002), Student and Teacher Perceptions of Mind Mapping: A Middle School Case Study. Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, pp. 2-18.
Hawrani, H. (2011). The Impact of Using the mind Map Strategy on The Ninth Grade Students Achievement in Science and Their Attitudes Toward Science In the Governmental Schools in Qalqilya. (Unpublished MA Thesis). An Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Hubbard. R.S., & Power, B.M. (2003). The area of classroom inquiry: A handbook for teacher-researchers. Portsmouth. NH: Heinemann.
Heidari, A. & Karimi, L,. (2015). The Effect of Min Mapping on Vocabulary Learning and Retention. International Journal of Education Investigations, 2(12), 54-72.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edition. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). KSSR Bahasa Inggeris SK Tahun 3, Putrajaya:Bahagian Pembanguanan Kurikulam Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Khoshsima, H., & Rezaeian Tiyar, F. (2014). The effect of summarising strategy on reading comprehension of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), 134-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.11
Kusuma, E. (2015). The Effect of Mind Mapping Techniques on the Vocabulary Mastery of Second Grade Students of Elementary School. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Widy Mandala Catholic University, Surabaya.
Maibodi, T. J., & Haji Ashraf. A. (2017). The Impact of Mind Mapping Strategy on Vocabulary Use in the Writing of Iranian EFL Learners. The 2nd International Conference on New Trends in English Language Teaching and Testing, Iran, pp. 1-19.
Li, M., Yang, K,. & Chen, H. (2010). Using Mind Maps as a Strategy for Vocabulary Acquisition in Chinese Universities, 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering, Wuhan.
Misbah, N.H., Mohamad, M., Yunus, M.M., & Ya’Acob A. (2017). Identifying the Factors Contributing to Students’ Difficulties in the English Language Learning. Creative Education, 8(13), 1999-2008. doi:10.4236/ce.2007.813136.
Muhamad, M., & Kiely, R (2018). Understanding Teachers Pedagogical Knowledge in ESL Vocabulary Teaching. Journal of Art and Humanities, 7(1), 36-47. doi:10.18533/journal.v7i1.1328.
Nation, I. S. (2006). How Large A Vocabulary Is Needed For Reading And Listening. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.
O’Mallley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robert Ayin, V, I. & M. Shah, P. (2020), Strategies in Learning and Acquiring English Vocabulary among Level 2 Pupils in Saeh, Subis Primary Schools, International Journal of New Technology and Research (IJNTR), 6(3), 1-6.
Sahrawi. (2013). The Effectiveness of Mind Mapping for Teaching Vocabulary to the Eight Grad Students of SMP Negeri 3 Sungai kakap in Academic Year 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 2 (2), 263-247
Salkind, N. J. (ed.). (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n331
Scheid, K. (1993). Helping students become strategic learners: Guidelines for teaching. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In N. Schmitt, & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schmitt, N. (2014). Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning, 64(4), 913-951.
Thornbury, S. (2002). How to Teach Vocabulary. Edinburgh: Longman.
Velayutham, V. & Yunus, M, M. (2019), Mind Mapping as a Tool to Enhance English Literature Comprehension, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 10(8), 28-41.
Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Linguistics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: MFT Press.
Yunus, M. M., & Chien, C. H. (2016). The Use of Mind Mapping Strategy in Malaysian University English Test (MUET) Writing. Creative Education, 7(4), 619–626. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.74064