Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number2.  June 2022                                 Pp.123-139
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.9

Full Paper PDF

 

Deception Strategies in the Discourse of American Think Tanks: An Argumentative-
Pragmatic Analysis
 

Ali Al-juboori
Department of English, College of Languages
University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Corresponding Author: ali.hamza501@gmail.com

Sabah S. Mustafa
Department of English, College of Languages
University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq

 

Received: 1/21/2022                      Accepted: 4/3/2022                          Published: 6/24/2022

 

Abstract:
Deception is a misrepresentation of reality that attracted many researchers examining it from various perspectives. However, no due attention has been given to the discursive deception strategies in the work of think tanks. This study aims at exposing the deception strategies deployed in the conservative American think tanks’ discourse which concern itself with the (re)production of socio-political realities. The study holds the significance of the detection and explication of argumentative and pragmatic discursive deception strategies which impose ideological hegemony and socio-political polarization of the positively presented Self against the negatively presented Other. This study attempts to answer a twofold question: what are the discursive deception strategies involved in the work of think tanks, and why/how these strategies are applied? To this end, eight political texts from three think tanks were analyzed adopting an eclectic model based on van Dijk (2000) and Yule (1996). The analyzed data mainly focuses on four political themes namely (1) terrorism in Islam, (2) Russian role in the Middle East, (3) the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, (4) the U.S. policy in the Middle East. The results demonstrate the pervasiveness of discursive deception strategies in the think tanks’ discourse which endeavor to communicate an ideological polarization of a positive presentation of the Self against a negative presentation of the Other and reinforce a hegemony of particular socio-political realities. Findings can be beneficial for students of (critical) discourse analysis, media, communications studies, and  English for special purposes.
Keywords: Critical discourse analysis, deception, ideology, political discourse, think tanks

Cite as:  Al-juboori, A., & Mustafa, S. S. (2022). Deception Strategies in the Discourse of American Think Tanks: An Argumentative-Pragmatic Analysis. Arab World English Journal, 13 (2) 123-139.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.9

References

Al-Hindawi, F., & Al-Aadli, N. (2017). The Pragmatics of Deception in American Presidential     Electoral Speeches. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5, 207-219.

Chadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2022). Deception as a Bridging Concept in the Study of  Disinformation, Misinformation,
and Misperceptions: Toward a Holistic Framework. Communication Theory, 32(1), 1–24. DOI: 10.1093/ct/qtab019

Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse. London: Routledge.

Dunmire, P. (2012). Political Discourse Analysis: Exploring the Language of Politics and the  Politics of Language.
Language and Linguistics Compass 6(11), 735–  751.

El-Zawawy, A. (2017). Towards a New Linguist Model for Detecting Political Lies. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 21(1), 183-202.
DOI: 10.22363/2312-9182-2017-21-1- 183-202

Fairclough, N. (2012). Critical discourse analysis. In J. P. Gee, & M. Hanford, M. (eds.),  The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp.  9-20). New York: Routledge.

Fifteen years after 9/11, and America still sleeps. (2016b). Hoover Institute. Retrieved January 2, 2020, from
https://www.hoover.org/site- search?keyword=Fifteen+years+after+&src=navbar

Fowler, R, Hodge, B., Kress, G., & Trew, T.  (1979). Language and Control. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Filardo-Ilamas, L., &. Boyd, M., S. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis and Politics. In J. Flowerdew & J. E. Richardson (eds.),
The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, (pp. 312-327). New York: Routledge.

Flowerdew, J., & J. E. Richardson (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse  Studies. New York: Routledge.

Galasinski, D. (2000). The Language of Deception. London: Sage Publications.

Godson, R., & Wirtz, J. (2000). Strategic Denial and Deception. International Journal of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence
13
(4), 424-437.

ISIS – The Latest Phase Of The Jihad. (2016a). Hoover Institute. Retrieved January 5, 2020,
from https://www.hoover.org/research/isis-latest-phase-jihad

Luke, A. (2002). Beyond Science and Ideology Critique: Developments in Critical   Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 22, 96-110. DOI:10.1017/S0267190502000053

Macdonald, S. (2007). Propaganda and Information warfare in the twenty-first century.  London: Routledge.

Mattes, K., Popova, V., & Evans, J.R. (2021). Deception Detection in Politics: Can Voters Tell When Politicians are Lying?
Political Behavior. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-021-09747-1

McGann, J. (2019). Think Tanks, Foreign Policy, and the Emerging Powers. Philadelphia:   Palgrave Macmillan.

Middle East Policy Planning for a Second Obama Administration. (2012). The Washington   Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved February 2, 2020, from  https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/middle-east-policy-planning-second          obama-administration-memo-fictional-nsc-staffer

Olajimbiti, E. (2019). The Pragmatics of Political Deception on Facebook. In I. Chiluwa, &     S. Samoilenko, (eds.), The Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and  Misinformation Online (pp. 308-325).  IGI Global.

Oswald, S., Didier. M., & Saussure, L. (2016). Deceptive and uncooperative verbal   communication. In A. Rocci, &L.
Saussure (eds.), Verbal Communication (pp. 509-534). Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Paolucci, P. (2009). Public Discourse in an Age of Deception: Forging the Iraq War. Critical Sociology, 35(6), 863-886.
DOI: 10.1177/0896920509343086

Palestinians Miss Opportunity by Rejecting Trump Peace Plan. (2020). The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved February 10, 2020, from https://www.heritage.org/middle-      east/commentary/palestinians-miss-opportunity-rejecting-trump-peace-plan

Plehwe, D., (2015). The politics of policy think-tanks: organizing expertise, legitimacy and counter-expertise in policy networks. In Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnova, A., Orsini, M., (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Policy Studies (pp. 358-377). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Provocative Palestinian U.N. Actions Require Strong U.S. Response. (2015). The Heritage  Foundation. Retrieved January 5, 2020, from https://www.heritage.org/middle-  east/report/provocative-palestinian-un-actions-require-strong-us-response

Ricketts, S. (2021). Do political actors engage in strategic deception on social media? Warwick  Monash Economics Student
Papers 2021
(16) 1-47. ISSN 2754-3129.

Teubert, W. (2010). Meaning, Discourse and Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Catalano, T., & Waugh, L., R. (2020). Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies  and Beyond. Springer.
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49379-0

The Middle East 2017, Russia in the Middle East. (2017). Brookings. Retrieved January 10,  2020, from https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-middle-east-2017/

The United States Needs a Middle East Strategy. (2017). The Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Retrieved February 10, 2020,
from https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy- analysis/united-states-needs-middle-east-strategy

Understanding and deterring Russia: U.S. policies and strategies. (2016). Brookings. Retrieved January 1, 2020, from https://www.brookings.edu/testimonies/understanding- and-deterring-russia-u-spoliciesand-strategies/

Van Dijk, T. (2006). Ideology and Discourse Analysis. Journal of Political Ideologies 11, 115- 140.

Van Dijk T, (2015). Ideology. In G. Mazzoleni, (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication
(pp. 495-505). John Wiley & Sons.

Van Dijk, T. (2000). Ideology and Discourse. A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Retrieved from           http://www.discourses.org/OldBooks/Teun%20A%20van%20Dijk%20- 20Ideology%20and%20Discourse.pdf.

Van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B., & Meuffels, B. (2006). Fallacies and Judgments on Reasonableness. London: Springer.

Weaver, K. (1989). The Changing World of Think Tanks. Political Science and  Politics, 22,     563-578.

Wiarda, H. (2010). Think tanks and foreign policy: The Foreign Policy Research  Institute and    presidential politics. Plymouth:
Lexington Books.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 1/21/2022  
Accepted: 4/3/2022
Published: 6/24/2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.9 

Ali Al-juboori is an M. A. candidate in the Department of English, University of Baghdad, College of Languages. His areas of interest are discourse analysis and psycholinguistics, and Universal Grammar. ORCid: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1357-4420

Dr. Sabah S. Mustafa is a professor of Linguistics and Translation in the Department of English, University of Baghdad, College of Languages in which he has been teaching English since 1987. He has published several articles in the area of Linguistics and Translation. His research interests are contrastive linguistics, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and discourse analysis. He is currently Editor-in-chief of the Journal of Languages. ORCid: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6504-3560.