Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 12. Number1  March 2021                                       Pp. 515-526
DOI:https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.33

 Full paper PDF  

 A Comparative Study of Boosters between Genders in the Introduction Section 

Mazlin Mohamed Mokhtar
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia
Correspondent Author: mazlin@fbk.upsi.edu.my 

Harwati Hashim
Faculty of Education
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia

Puteri Zarina Megat Khalid
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia

Intan Safinas Mohd Ariff Albakri
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia

Norfaizah Abdul Jobar
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysiau 

 

Recived: 7/31/2020                   Accepted: 3/8/2021                   Published: 3/28/2021

 

Abstract:
Although there are several studies conducted by linguistics researchers on the differences between the linguistic styles of female and male writers, there are not many studies conducted on the use of boosters in academic writing. Boosters are used to convince and emphasize statements made. This study analyzes the regularity of boosters used in the Introduction section of Ten Research Articles (RAs). The influence of gender differences in the use of specific boosters will also be looked at. A document analysis method was chosen as the 10 RAs were analyzed as the corpus in this study. The findings showed that male writers used more boosters than female writers. Even though the number of words for the female writers was more than the male writers, it did not affect the number of boosters used in the Introduction section of those articles. In conclusion, it can be deduced from the analysis that both the female and male writers used boosters to highlight their claims or their beliefs regardless of their gender, while the use of boosters was more evident among the male RAs as the male writers seemed to be more direct in illustrating and mentioning their claims.
Keywords:  belief, boosters, gender, solidarity

Cite as: Mokhtar, M. M.,  Hashim, H., Khalid, P.Z.M., Albakri, I.S. M. S., &  Jobar, N. A.  (2021).
A Comparative Study of Boosters between Genders in the Introduction Section. Arab World English Journal, 12 (1) 515-526.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.33

References

Ali, S. M., & Krish, P. (2016). Gender-Specific English Language Use of Malaysian Blog Authors. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 21-35. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2016-1603-02

Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F. (2009). Promotional (meta) discourse in research articles in language and literary studies. English for Specific Purposes, 28(1), 58–68. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2008.09.001

Akbas, E., & Hardman, J. (2018). Strengthening or weakening claims in academic knowledge construction: A comparative study of hedges and boosters in postgraduate academic writing. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18(4).

Amir, Z., Abidin, H., Darus, S., & Ismail, K. (2012). Gender differences in the language use of Malaysian teen bloggers. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 105-124.

Bacang, B. C., Rillo, R. M., & Alieto, E. O. (2019). The Gender Construct in the Use of Rhetorical Appeals, Hedges, and Boosters in ESL Writing: A Discourse Analysis. Online Submission, 25, 210-224.

Batool, S. F., Majeed, H., & Zahra, T. (2019). An Investigation of Hedges and Boosters in Pakistani Opinion Articles: A Corpus-based Study. Corporum: Journal of Corpus Linguistics–CJCL, 2(1), 1-12.

Hamid, B. D. H. A., Yasin, M. S. M., Bakar, K. A., Keong, Y. C., & Jalaluddin, A. (2008). Linguistic sexism and gender role stereotyping in Malaysian English language textbooks. GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 8(2), 45-78.

Hewings, A., Lillis, T., & Vladimirou, D. (2010). Who’s citing whose writings? A corpus-based study of citations as interpersonal resource in English medium national and English medium international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 102-115.

Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication, 10( 3),  185-205. UK: Pergamon Press Plc.

Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 18(3), 349-382.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press

Hyland, K. (2008). ‘Small bits of textual material’: A discourse analysis of Swales’ writing. English for Specific Purposes, 27, 143–160.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London and New York: Continuum.

Hyon, S. (2008). Convention and inventiveness in an occluded academic genre: A case study of retention–promotion–tenure reports. English for Specific Purposes, 27(2), 175-192. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.003

Keong, Y. C., Gill, S. K., & Noorezam, M. (2012). Gender Differences and Culture in English Short Message Service Language among Malay University Students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 18(2), 67-74.

Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44–57.

Lewin, B. A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of toning down in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 163-178. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.08.001

Lorés-Sanz, R., Mur-Deñas, P., & Lafuente-Millán, E. (eds.). (2010). Constructing Interpersonality: Multiple Perspectives on Written Academic Genres. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers.

Mahamod, Z., Azhar, M. Q. A., & Hassan, H. (2019). Knowledge Differences, Attitudes and Practices Using Six Thinking Hats by Gender and Specialization in the Malay Language Primary School Teachers. Creative Education, 10(10), 2186-2200. DOI: http://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1010158

Recski, L. (2005). Interpersonal engagement in academic spoken discourse: a functional account of dissertation defenses. English for Specific Purposes, 24(1), 5–23. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.07.001

Tardy, C. M. (2005). “It’s like a story”: Rhetorical knowledge development in advanced academic literacy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(4), 325–338.

Vassileva, I. (2001). Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 20(1), 83-102. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00029-0

Yeung, L. (2007). In search of commonalities: Some linguistic and rhetorical features of business reports as a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), 156–179.

Zafar, S. (2018). A Metadiscourse Study of Boosters and Hedges in Research Article Abstracts: Study of Boosters and Hedges in Research Article Abstracts. CORPORUM: Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 1(1), 29-41.

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
Received: 7/31/2020 
Accepted: 3/8/2021 
Published: 3/28/2021
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.33
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Dr. Mazlin M. Mokhtar is a Senior Lecturer at the Sultan Idris Education University. She is an experienced TESL lecturer who has taught previously in school and polytechnics.  Her research interests are Sociolinguistics, ESP, ESL and ICT in Education. She had also written a few books from Oxford Sdn. Bhd. and journals in UJER, Creative Education, TEFLIN, as well as part of the Editorial Board for AJELP, IJEISR and JPPKK Journals.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8231-2678

Dr. Harwati Hashim is Senior Lecturer at the Research Centre for Innovation in Learning and Teaching, Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Her areas of concentration are ESL, Mobile-assisted Language Learning (MALL), technology acceptance as well as language pedagogy, and the use of technology in teaching English as a Second Language (ESL).   ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-427X

Dr. Puteri Zarina Megat Khalid is a senior lecturer currently attached to Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia.  Among her research interests are TESL, genre analysis, modality analysis, pragmatics, TVET, English for Specific Purposes (ESP), and Systemic Functional Linguistics.  She is also a member of the International Association of Applied Linguistics, Malaysian Institute of Applied Linguistics, International Systemic Functional Linguistics Association (ISFLA), Malaysian Society for Engineering & Technology (MySET), and Institute of Marine, Science and Technology (IMAREST). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9296-8662

Associate Professor Dr. Intan Safinas Mohd Ariff Albakri is an Associate Professor at Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia. Her areas of expertise are materials and methods in teaching the English Language.  She is currently leading a research on mentoring pre-service and beginning teachers and a member of research on Developing a Quality Teacher Education Framework under the Ministry of Education Malaysia. She is also the Editor-in-chief for the Asian Journal of English Language and Pedagogy. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-1709

Dr. Norfaizah Abdul Jobar is a Senior Lecturer in UPSI. She was a secondary school teacher for 15 years before joining the university. She is a Ph.D. graduate in Malay Language from UPSI. She was a subject coordinator and speaker for SPM Malay Language and she is still an instructor in Mualim District. She has also presented nationally as well as internationally and has also published a few research papers in her field of study.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5888-5492