Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 16. Number 2, June 2025 Pp. 20-35

The Use of Discourse Markers in Non-Native Speaker Speech: A Case from Vietnam

 Institute of Foreign Language Training, Thu Dau Mot University,
Binh Duong Province, Vietnam

CHAV2, Institute of Foreign Language Training, Thu Dau Mot University,
Binh Duong Province, Vietnam

Faculty of Social Sciences, Can Tho University of Technology,
Can Tho City, Vietnam

 Faculty of Foreign Languages, Ba Ria - Vung Tau College of Education,
Ba Ria - Vung Tau Province, Vietnam

Abstract:

Using discourse markers brings various benefits for speakers in communication. The current study investigated the use of discourse markers by Vietnamese EFL students at an English center. The study aims to explore the use of DMs by Vietnamese EFL learners and investigates their perceptions of DMs in conversations. This study employed both quantitative and qualitative methods, utilizing audio recordings, questionnaires, and interviews to collect data. It involved one hundred twenty-five Vietnamese EFL students and five teachers as participants. The findings reveal that students use some discourse markers more frequently than others. The referential discourse markers prevail in participants’ responses, while using structural discourse markers is almost negligible. The results also indicate that students are practically aware of the importance and functions of discourse markers; however, they are not quite familiar with the different types of these devices. The teachers also recognized the importance of discourse markers for students’ language competence development, but considered their use less effective. This study makes a significant contribution to English teaching and learning in EFL contexts in Vietnam. The research suggests that teachers should raise students’ awareness of the benefits of discourse markers in oral communication. This study also recommends various strategies for teachers to improve students’ fluency and develop their pragmatic competence through using discourse markers in communication.

Cite as:

Du, T. T., Binh, L.T., Dung, D. T.B., & The, N. H. (2025). The Use of Discourse Markers in Non-Native Speaker Speech: A Case from Vietnam. Arab World English Journal, 16 (2):20-35

References:

Ali, E., & Mahadin, R. (2015). The use of interpersonal discourse markers by students of English at the University of Jordan. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 6(4). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847459

Ali, A. (2022). Use of Discourse Markers among Senior University Students. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(1),161-172.  https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.11

Archer, D., Aijmer, K., & Wichmann, A. (2012). Pragmatics: An advanced resource book. Routledge.

Arya, T. (2020). Exploring discourse marker use in Thai university students’ conversations. LEARN   Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 13(1), 247-267.

Brinton, L. J. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/9783110907582

Brinton, L. (1990). The development of discourse markers in English. In J. Fisiak (Ed.), Historical Linguistics and Philology (pp. 45-71). Mouton de Gruyter.

Buysse, L. (2010). Discourse markers in the English of Flemish university students. In I. Witczak-Plisiecka (Ed.), Pragmatic perspectives on language and linguistics: Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-2974054

Fraser, B. (1996). Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics, 6 (2), 167-190.

Fuller, J. (2003). Discourse marker use across speech contexts: A comparison of native and non-native speaker performance. Multilingua-journal of Cross-cultural and Interlanguage Communication, 22(2), 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1515/mult.2003.010

Fung, L. (2011). Discourse markers in the ESL classroom: A survey of teachers’ attitudes. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 199-248.

Fung, L., & Carter, R. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410-439. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm030

Hasselgreen, A. (2004). Testing the spoken English of young Norwegians: A study of test validity and the role of “small words” in contributing to pupil’s fluency. Cambridge University Press.

Haroon, N. et al (2000). Discourse Markers in Arabic and English Newspaper Articles: The Case of the Arabic Lakin and its English equivalent But. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(1) March 2020.  DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.13

Hellermann, J., & Vergun, A. (2007). Language which is not taught: The discourse marker use of beginning adult learners of English. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 157-179.

Lenk, U. (1998). Discourse markers and global coherence in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(2), 245-257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00027-7

Louwerse, M. M., & Mitchell, H. H. (2003). Toward a taxonomy of a set of discourse Markers in a dialog: A theoretical and computational linguistic account. Discourse Processes, 35(3), 199-239. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326950DP3503_1

Min, S. (2011). A Corpus-based analysis of EFL learners’ use of discourse markers in cross-cultural communication. English Language & Literature Teaching, 16(4), 177-194.

Müller, S. (2005). Discourse markers in native and non-native English discourse. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.138

Neary-Sundquist, C. (2014). The use of pragmatic markers across proficiency levels in second language speech. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 637-663. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.4.4

Tree, J. E. F. (2010). Discourse markers across speakers and settings. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(5), 269-281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00195.x

Truong, P. S. (2022). Using English discourse markers to enhance speaking skills: A case study at Van Lang University. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(5), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.22256

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511611841

Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3), 227-265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg

Dr. Tran Thanh Du specializes in both in TESOL methodologies and Contrastive Linguistics. He is currently a lecturer and head of the Institute of Foreign Language Training at Thu Dau Mot University in Vietnam. He takes his interests in studies of linguistics, sociolinguistics, pragmatics, learner motivation, and English language teaching methodologies. All of his published works focus on both linguistic studies and TESOL-related issues. He endeavors to improve language use in general, and English language teaching and learning in global contexts.ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7802-9949

Ly Thien Binh is majoring in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. He is a teacher of English at an English center in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam, and is currently pursuing his M.A. in English language at Thu Dau Mot University. He takes his interests in studies of linguistics, learner motivation, and language teaching methodologies. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3740-4198

 Dr. Dang Thi Bao Dung is currently serving as a lecturer at Can Tho University of Technology, Vietnam. She holds a Master’s degree in TESOL from Victoria University, Australia, and a Ph.D. in Contrastive Linguistics from the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam. Her research interests include language skills, teaching methodologies, test-preparation instruction, and the interplay between language and culture. Her published research encompasses both language teaching and linguistics.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8194-8975

Nguyen Huu The is a Doctor of Comparative Linguistics. He is currently a lecturer at the Faculty of Foreign Languages, Ba Ria—Vung Tau College of Education, Vietnam. His primary areas of expertise are TESOL and Comparative linguistics. His research interests are linguistics, semantics, stylistics, pragmatics, and English language teaching methodologies. All of his published works focus on linguistic research and topics related to TESOL. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2075-6793