Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number1 March 2022                                                 Pp.3-26

Full Paper PDF


The Efficacy of Completing Form-focused Tasks Collaboratively vs Individually: Utilizing
Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to Quantify Learning Gains

James Scotland
Foundation Program Department of English
Qatar University, Qatar


Received: 9/7/2021                 Accepted: 11/1/2021                               Published:3/24/2022


Many language teachers employ collaborative learning within their classrooms. However, expectations surrounding the efficacy of working collaboratively need to be empirically verified. This study employed dynamic assessment to investigate whether learners who are situated within an undergraduate Qatari EFL context learn second language grammatical structures more effectively by working either collaboratively with their peers or individually. Interventionist dynamic assessment was used to quantify the extent of the learning gains made by male Arabic undergraduate EFL learners (N = 52) three times (pretest, posttest, and delayed posttest) over a 12-week period. In between the pretest and the posttest, six form-focused treatment tasks were administered. The experimental group (n = 20) completed the tasks collaboratively with their peers; a comparison group (n = 16) completed the tasks individually; and a control group (n = 16) did not complete the tasks. The target structures were the simple past passive and the present continuous passive. A Mood’s median test (Mood, 1954) found no statistically significant differences between the collaborative condition and the individual condition. Although measuring emergent abilities which are still in the process of developing provided a more complete picture of the efficacy of working collaboratively, the lack of a statistically significant difference between the performances of the experimental and comparison groups for both target structures suggests that working collaboratively is not statistically more effective in facilitating learners’ linguistic development than working individually.
Keywords: collaborative learning, focus on form, individual learning, interventionist dynamic assessment

Cite as: Scotland, J. (2022). The Efficacy of Completing Form-focused Tasks Collaboratively vs Individually: Utilizing Interventionist Dynamic Assessment to Quantify Learning Gains.  Arab World English Journal, 13 (1) .3-26.


Adams, R. (2007). Do second language learners benefit from interacting with each other. In A.

Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 29-51). Oxford University Press.

Adams, R., Nuevo, A. M., & Egi, T. (2011). Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and

SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner–learner interactions?
The Modern Language Journal, 95(s1), 42-63.

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based

instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1-18.

Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language

learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 465-483.

Antón, M. (2009). Dynamic assessment of advanced second language learners. Foreign

Language Annals, 42(3), 576-598.

Antón, M. (2019). Expanding the role of dynamic assessment in language education. Language

and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 116-131.

Antón, M., & DiCamilla, F. J. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction

in the L2 classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 233-247.

Budoff, M. & M. Friedman. (1964). “Learning potential” as an assessment approach to the

adolescent mentally retarded. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(5), 434–439.

Carpenter, S. K., & Mueller, F. E. (2013). The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign

language pronunciation learning. Memory & Cognition, 41(5), 671-682.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.).


Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning,

teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

Davin, K. J., & Gómez-Pereira, D. (2019). Evaluating instruction through classroom dynamic

assessment: A sandwich approach. Language and Sociocultural Theory, 6(1), 6-31.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G.

Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Ablex.

Dumas, D., McNeish, D., & Greene, J. A. (2020). Dynamic measurement: A theoretical–

psychometric paradigm for modern educational psychology. Educational Psychologist, 55(2), 88-105.

Eckerth, J. (2008). Investigating consciousness-raising tasks: Pedagogically targeted and non-

targeted learning gains. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(2), 119-145.

Elabdali, R. (2021). Are two heads really better than one? A meta-analysis of the L2 learning benefits

of collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 1-16.

Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group,

pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(1), 40-58.

Fernández Dobao, A. (2014a). Vocabulary learning in collaborative tasks: A comparison of pair

and small group work. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 497-520.

Fernández Dobao, A. (2014b). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair

and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 158-187.

Ferrara, R. A., Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Children’s learning and transfer of

inductive reasoning rules: Studies of proximal development. Child Development, 57(5),


Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A (2008). Microgenesis, method and object: A study of collaborative

activity in a Spanish as a foreign language classroom. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 120-148.

Guthke, J. & J. F. Beckmann. (2000). The learning test concept and its applications in practice.

In C. S. Lidz & J. G. Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp.17-69). Elsevier.

Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). The effect of interaction in acquiring the grammar of a second

language. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 343-358.

Lantolf, J. P. (2009). Dynamic assessment: The dialectic integration of instruction and

assessment. Language Teaching, 42(3), 355-368.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language

development. Oxford University Press.

Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2011). Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian

praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 11-33.

Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Smith, M. (2002). Reformulation and the learning of French

pronominal verbs in a Canadian French immersion context. The Modern Language Journal,
(4), 485-507.

Long, M. H., & Porter, P. A. (1985). Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language

acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207-228.

McNeil, L. (2018). Understanding and addressing the challenges of learning computer-mediated

dynamic assessment: A teacher education study. Language Teaching Research, 22(3), 289-309.

McNicoll, J., & Lee, J. H. (2011). Collaborative consciousness-raising tasks in EAL classrooms.

English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4), 127-138.

Minick, N. (1987). Implications of Vygotsky’s theories for dynamic assessment. In C. Lidz

(Ed.), Dynamic Assessment (pp. 116–140). Guilford Press.

Mohammadimoghadam, M. (2015). Effects of mediation on an EFL learner’s grammar

development: A case study of an EFL beginner student. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 101-106.

Mood, A. M. (1954). On the asymptotic efficiency of certain nonparametric two-sample tests.

The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 25(3), 514-522.

Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and their effects on

learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 397-419.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and

quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417-528.

Pica, T., & Doughty, C. (1985). The role of group work in classroom second language

acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(02), 233-248.

Poehner, M. E. (2007). Beyond the test: L2 dynamic assessment and the transcendence of

mediated learning. The Modern Language Journal, 91(3), 323-340.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and

promoting L2 development. Springer Science & Business Media.

Poehner, M. E., Zhang, J., & Lu, X. (2015). Computerized dynamic assessment (C-DA):

Diagnosing L2 development according to learner responsiveness to mediation. Language Testing, 32(3), 337-357.

Rassaei, E. (2019). Tailoring mediation to learners’ ZPD: Effects of dynamic and non-dynamic

corrective feedback on L2 development. The Language Learning Journal, 47(5), 591-607.

Reinders, H. (2009). Learner uptake and acquisition in three grammar-oriented production

activities. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 201-222.

Rohrer, D. (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educational

Psychology Review, 24(3), 355-367.

Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. D. (1995). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative

problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Scotland, J. (2017). Participating in a shared cognitive space: An exploration of working

collaboratively and longer-term performance of a complex grammatical structure, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).
University of Exeter, United Kingdom.

Scotland, J. (2021). The efficacy of collaboratively completing form-focused tasks: A research

synthesis. In M. D. P. G. Mayo (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 35-57).
De Gruyter Mouton.

Spielman-Davidson, S. J. (2000). Collaborative dialogues in the zone of proximal development,

grade eight French immersion students learning the conditional tense, (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).
Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto, Canada.

Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of

Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.

Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2007). Writing tasks: The effects of collaboration. In M. D. P.

García Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language settings (pp. 157-177). Multilingual Matters.

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through

collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning
(pp. 97-114). Oxford University Press.

Swain, M. (2001). Integrating language and content teaching through collaborative tasks.

Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(1), 44-63.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent

French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320-337.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2001). Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task

effects. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning,
teaching and testing
(pp. 99-118). Routledge.

Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to

reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3/4), 285-304.

Teng, M. F. (2020). The effectiveness of group, pair and individual output tasks on learning

phrasal verbs. The Language Learning Journal, 48(2), 187-200.

van Compernolle, R. A., & Zhang, H. (2014). Dynamic assessment of elicited imitation: A case

analysis of an advanced L2 English speaker. Language Testing, 31(4), 395-412.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Harvard University Press.

Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford University Press.

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on reddit
Share on email
Share on stumbleupon
Share on digg
Received: 9/7/2021
Accepted: 11/1/2021
Published: 3/24/2022   
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

James Scotland currently teaches English in the Foundation Program at Qatar University. James has previously taught in Australia, Canada, England, South Korea, and Turkey. He has a Cambridge DELTA, a Master’s in Education, and a Doctorate in Education. His professional interests include Vygotskian sociocultural theory and second language acquisition.