Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020 Pp.360-377
Students’ Perception of the Use of Learning Management System to Facilitate Flipped
Learning Experience for English Language Teaching in Private Higher Education
Institution in Oman: A Developmental Evaluation
Asma Al Aufi(correspondent author)
Centre for Foundation Studies
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Vikas Rao Naidu
Department of Computing
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Learning Management System (LMS) has become an integral part of education technology in every institution. Almost all the Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are using LMS to facilitate their teaching and learning processes. The study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of LMS and the basic perception of students on the usage of LMS and various plugins to support their learning process not only to ensure its quality but also to evaluate different strategies for its future enhancement. Hence, this study adopts a developmental evaluation framework to assess students’ satisfaction and perception of using the (LMS) in their experiential Flipped Learning (FL) of English language modules. The methodology follows the pragmatic paradigm based on Dewey’s theory to allow for mixed-method instruments to be employed for a better understanding of the LMS, exploring its challenges and opportunities. This small-scale evaluative study involved a survey of 70 respondents and a focus group of ten students in a private HEI in Oman to explore their FL experience in English modules. The depiction of this experience represented positive responses emphasizing how FL technology-enhanced individualized/experiential learning reinforced in life-long learning skills suitable for career practice. Recommendations are offered for LMS to facilitate enhanced flipped teaching implementation, promoting a student-centered environment ideal for a broader approach of active learning in HEI contexts.
Keywords: Developmental evaluation, education technology, experiential learning, flipped learning, learning management system (LMS)
Cite as: Al Aufi, A., & Naidu, V.R. (2020). Students’ Perception of the Use of Learning Management System to Facilitate Flipped Learning Experience for English Language Teaching in Private Higher Education Institution in Oman: A Developmental Evaluation. Arab World English Journal(AWEJ). Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOLConference 2020: 360-377.
A.Sharma, V.R. Naidu (2020) A Study on emerging trends to enhance learning experience in higher education institutions, INTED2020 Proceedings, pp. 7391-7396. doi: 10.21125/inted.2020.1974
Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2014). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(1), 1-14. doi:10.1080/07294360.2014.934336
Al Kalbani, B., Rao Naidu, V., Rani Gupta, R., & Al Sawafi, A. (2020). Teaching Mathamatics through Online Collaborative Environment in the higher education context. In IJAEDU-International E-Journal of Advances in Education: Vol. VI (Issue 17). https://doi.org/10.18768/IJAEDU.789432
Al Badai, N., Al Ajmi, Z., & Naidu, V. R. (2017). Effectiveness of open educational resources for enhanced learning in flipped classroom. ICERI2017 Proceedings. doi:10.21125/iceri.2017.2358
ALRowais, A. S. (2014). The impact of flipped learning on achievement and attitudes in higher education. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 4(1), 1914-1921. doi:10.20533/ijcdse.2042.6364.2014.0266
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2015). From passive to active: The impact of the flipped classroom through social learning platforms on higher education students’ creative thinking. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1133-1148. doi:10.1111/bjet.12353
Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Arlington: ISTE.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc
Bino, D., Rajalekshmi, K. G., & Ramaiah, C. (2017). An Iterative approach for institutional adoption and implementation of flipped learning: A case study of Middle East College. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 534-542. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73210-7_63
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Bristol, T. (2014). Flipping the classroom. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 9(1), 43-46. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2013.11.002
Brooke, J., & Lister, H. (2016). ‘Oh, flip that!’ An evaluation of flipped learning in initial teacher education. Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice, 7(1), 16-24. doi:10.5920/till.2016.713
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, Incorporated, London
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London: Sage publications.
Crews, T., & Butterfield, J. (2014). Data for flipped classroom design: Using student feedback to identify the best components from online and face-to-face classes. Higher Education Studies, 4(3), 38-47. doi:10.5539/hes.v4n3p38
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). London and New York: Routledge.
Dewey, J. (1948). Reconstruction in philosophy. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Dewey, J. (1981). The philosophy of John Dewey (2nd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Dolinar, S. (2015). Cronbach alpha. [Diagram]. Retrieved, from https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/a-new-way-to-look-at-sample-size-math-supplement/
Engin, M. (2014). Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(5), 12-26. doi:10.14434/josotlv14i5.12829
Fischer, G. (2000). Lifelong learning—more than training. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 11(3), 265-294.
Gorman, G. E., Clayton, P. R., Shep, S. J., & Clayton, A. (2005). Qualitative research for the information professional: A practical handbook (2nd Edition), New York, Neal-Schuman Publishers.
Hamdan, N., McKnight, P., McKnight, K., & Arfstrom, K. M. (2013). The flipped learning model: A white paper based on the literature review titled a review of flipped learning. Flipped Learning Network/Pearson/George Mason University from https://flippedlearning.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/WhitePaper_FlippedLearning.pdf.
Hung, H. T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96. doi: 10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
Ilgu, A., & Jahren, C. (2016). Evaluation of hybrid learning in a construction engineering context: A mixed-method approach. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(3), n3.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. doi:10.3102/0013189×033007014
Kim, M. K., Kim, S. M., Khera, O., & Getman, J. (2014). The experience of three flipped classrooms in an urban university: an exploration of design principles. The Internet and Higher Education, 22, 37-50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2014.04.003
Kurt, S. (2018). Bloom’s revised taxonomy. [Diagram]. Retrieved, from https://educationaltechnology.net/flipped-classroom/
Little, C. (2015). The flipped classroom in further education: literature review and case study. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 20(3), 265-279. doi: 10.1080/13596748.2015.1063260
Mazur, E. (2009). Education: Farewell, lecture? Science, 323(5910), 50-51. doi:10.1126/science.1168927
Meks, (2014). Flipped teaching and learning- A form of blended learning that just makes sense. [Diagram]. Retrieved from http://www.flippedclassroomworkshop.com/flipped-teaching-and-learning-a-form-on-blended-learning-that-just-makes-sense/
Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159-167. doi:10.1152/advan.00053.2006
Naidu V.R., Singh B., Farei K.A., Suqri N.A. (2020) Machine learning for flipped teaching in higher education—A reflection. Sustainable Development and Social Responsibility—Volume 2. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation (IEREK Interdisciplinary Series for Sustainable Development). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32902-0_16
Neto, J., Gomes, G., & Titton, L. (2017). Using technology driven flipped class to promote active learning in accounting. Revista Universo Contábil, 13(1), 49-64. doi:10.4270/ruc.2017103
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York: Guilford Press.
Poloju, K. K., & Naidu, V. R. (2020). Impact of e-tools in teaching and learning for undergraduate students. In H. S. Saini, R. K. Singh, M. Tariq Beg, & J. S. Sahambi (Eds.), Innovations in Electronics and Communication Engineering (pp. 783–790). Springer Singapore.
Ponikwer, F., & Patel, B. A. (2018). Implementation and evaluation of flipped learning for delivery of analytical chemistry topics. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 2263-2269. doi:10.1007/s00216-018-0892-2
Reyna, J. (2015). Active learning and the flipped classroom. Training & Development, 42(5), 30.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all learners. USA, John Wiley & Sons.
Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49. doi:10.14307/jfcs105.2.12
Sage, M., & Sele, P. (2015). Reflective journaling as a flipped classroom technique to increase reading and participation with social work students. Journal of Social Work Education, 51(4), 668-681. doi: 10.1080/10437797.2015.1076274
Saunders, M., Sin, C., & Dempster, S. (2015). Evaluative research in higher education policy analysis. In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research (Vol. 3, pp. 49-69). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Sharma, N., Lau, C. S., Doherty, I., & Harbutt, D. (2015). How we flipped the medical classroom. Medical Teacher, 37(4), 327-330. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.923821
Strayer, J. F. (2012). How learning in an inverted classroom influences cooperation, innovation and task orientation. Learning Environments Research, 15(2), 171-193. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9108-4
Stöhr, C., & Adawi, T. (2018). Flipped classroom research: From “black box” to “white box” evaluation. Education Sciences, 8(1), 2-4. doi:10.3390/educsci8010022
Tang, F., Chen, C., Zhu, Y., Zuo, C., Zhong, Y., Wang, N., … Liang, D. (2017). Comparison between flipped classroom and lecture-based classroom in ophthalmology clerkship. Medical Education Online, 22(1), 1395679. doi:10.1080/10872981.2017.1395679
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. [Diagram]. Retrieved from https://www.statisticshowto.datasciencecentral.com/cronbachs-alpha-spss/
Wilkinson, S. (1998). Focus group methodology: A review. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 1(3), 181-203. doi:10.1080/13645579.1998.10846874
Wong, K., & Chu, D. W. (2014). Is the flipped classroom model effective in the perspectives of students’ perceptions and benefits? Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 93-104. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08961-4_10
Wozny, N., Balser, C., & Ives, D. (2018). Evaluating the flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Economic Education, 49(2), 115-129. doi:10.1080/00220485.2018.1438860
Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155-164. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012
Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311-325. doi:10.1111/ejed.12014