Views: 1,840
Arab World English Journal (August 2024) Theses ID 314 Pp.1-23
Some students’ performance during computer-based tests (CBT) is affected by many factors. Such factors include a high anxiety level before and during the exam day, which might lead to low grades and weak performance. However, a Likert-scale questionnaire was designed to address two research questions, and the methodology was quantitative. Additionally, the Likert-scale questionnaire was used to collect data. The researcher conducted the study at the Rabigh branch of King Abdulaziz University. The participants were Saudi EFL preparatory year students who took computerized tests. Furthermore, 100 participants completed the questionnaire items. The researcher applied data analysis to present the findings of the study. The results demonstrate that most of the Saudi EFL students at the Rabigh branch of King Abdulaziz University (KAU) expressed their perceptions towards the computer-based (CBT) mode and its correlation to the level of anxiety they experienced the day before and during the test.
Ghumssani, B.H. H. (2024). Saudi EFL Universities Students’ Perceptions of Taking Computer-based Tests and Paper-based Tests. Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts, Taif University, Saudi Arabia. (M.A.Thesis). Retrieved from Arab World English Journal (ID Number: 314) August 2024: 1-23. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.314
Al-Amri, S. S. (2009). Computer-based testing vs paper-based testing: establishing the
comparability of reading tests through the evolution of a new comparability model in a Saudi
EFL context (Doctoral dissertation, The University of Essex).
Alwazzan, O. A., & Alyousef, H. S. (2019). Saudi EFL Learners’ Test Anxiety Levels during CBT
and PBT. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 16(2).
Choi, I. C. (2013). The impact of L2 proficiency and ESL students’ perceptions of EMI: Asian
perspectives. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 389-403.
De-Siqueira, Macario, J., Peris-Fajarnes, Guillermo, Gimenez, Fernando, Magal-Royo, &
Teresa. (2009). Spanish students and teachers’ preferences towards computer-based and
paper-and-pencil tests at universities. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 814–
Dewi, A. R., Saehu, A., & Budiman, R. (2021). Students’ perception of computer-based testing
Edubox- and its impact on their English learning motivation. Indonesian Journal of Learning
and Instruction, 4(1), pp.19-28. https://doi.org/10.25134/ijli.v4i1.4341
Ghaderi, M., Mogholi, M., & Soori, A. (2014). Comparing between computer based tests and
paper-and-pencil based tests. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 2(4), 36–
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.2n.4p.36
Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: an integrated
neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488-501.
Hariri-Akbari, M., Shokrvash, B., Mahmoodi, F., Jahanjoo-Aminabad, F., Yousefi, B., &
Azabdaftari, F. (2018). Conversion of extrinsic into intrinsic motivation and computer based
testing (CBT). BMC medical education, 18, 1-8.
Ijiwade, O., & Alonzo, D. (2023). Teacher Perceptions of the Use of a Computer-Adaptive Test
for Formative Purposes: Typologies of Practices. International Journal of Instruction, 16(2),
887–908. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16247a
Khoshsima, H., Hosseini, M., & Toroujeni, S. M. H. (2017). Cross-Mode Comparability of
Computer-Based Testing (CBT) versus Paper-Pencil Based Testing (PPT): An Investigation of
Testing Administration Mode among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. English Language
Teaching, 10(2), 23-32.
Mari, N. (2016). Language anxiety over EFL/ESL oral exam/test performance: a view from
language classrooms at Mehran University of Engineering and Technology Jamshoro Sindh,
Pakistan. Communication & Mass Media Complete, 16(5), 275-188.
Noijons, J. (1994). Testing computer assisted language testing: Towards a checklist for CALT.
CALICO Journal, 12(1), 37- 58.
Okocha F., Eyiolorunshe T. & Owolabi S. (2017) Student Perception and Acceptance of
Computer Based Testing: A Case Study of Landmark University Students. Journal of Digital
Innovations & Contemp Res. In Sc., Eng & Tech Vol. 5, No. 1. Pp 25-32.
Öz, H., & ÖÖz, & Özturan, (2018), T. (2018). Computer-based and paper-based testing: Does
the test administration mode influence the reliability and validity of achievement tests?.
Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 67-85.
Putwain, D. W. (2008).Deconstructing test anxiety. Emotional and
Behavioural Difficulties, 13(2), 141-155.
Sawaki, Y. (2012). Technology in language testing. In G. Fulcher, & F. Davidson (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of language testing, (pp. 426–437). Routledge.
Yanxia, Y. (2017). Test anxiety analysis of Chinese college students in computer-based spoken
English test. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), 63-73.23
Yu, W., & Iwashita, N. (2021). Comparison of test performance on paper-based testing (PBT)
and computer-based testing (CBT) by English-majored undergraduate students in China.
Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 32.
Zhi, M., & Huang, B. (2021). Investigating the authenticity of computer-and paper-based ESL
writing tests. Assessing Writing, 50, 100548
Badryah Hussain Hassan Ghumssani holds a master’s degree in Teaching English as a Second Language to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) from the Department of Foreign Languages, College of Arts, Taif University, Saudi Arabia. ORCiD ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-6769-812. She currently works at King Abdulaziz University, Rabigh