Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 14. Number 1 March 2023                                             Pp.349- 368
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.22

 Full Paper PDF

Pragmatic Awareness of Speech Acts, Politeness, and Grice Maxims of Iraqi EFL
Postgraduate Students

 Rana Yousif Abdulateef
Department of English Language
University of Baghdad, College of Languages
Baghdad, Iraq
Corresponding Author: rana.y@colang.uobaghdad.edu.iq

 Hanan Najim Abd Ali
Department of English Language
University of Baghdad, College of Languages
Baghdad, Iraq

 

Received:12/11/2022         Accepted:03/07/2023                 Published: 03/24/2023

 

Abstract:
This study examines postgraduate students’ awareness of pragmatic aspects, including Grice Maxims, Politeness, and Direct and Indirect forms of speech. According to Paul Grice’s theory of implicature, which is considered one of the most important contributions to pragmatics, this paper discusses how postgraduate students can meet the cooperative principle when communicating effectively. It also outlines how does politeness principles influence obeying or violating the maxims and how is the use of direct or indirect forms of utterances prompted by politeness. Sixteen master’s students of Linguistics and Literature were asked to take a multiple-choice test. The test will be represented along with the interpretation of each option given in each item. The initial point that the study investigates if belonging to two different groups (Linguistics and Literature) will result in various performances; this will be supplied with a clear-cut answer in the practical part. The theoretical part summarizes a literature review of the discoursal aspects understudy. In addition to clarifying maxims of quality, quantity, relation, and manner, the theoretical part discusses direct and indirect speech and how indirect speech is used to communicate perlocutionary effects. The conclusion will summarize the whole study by drawing upon the theoretical and practical parts simultaneously and providing further reasons for the variability and choice of one option over another.
Keywords: direct speech, Grice maxims, indirect speech, politeness, pragmatics awareness, Iraqi EFL postgraduate students

Cite as:  Abdulateef, R. Y., & Abd Ali, H. N. (2023). Pragmatic Awareness of Speech Acts, Politeness, and Grice Maxims of Iraqi EFL Postgraduate Students.  Arab World English Journal, 14 (1) 349- 368.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.22

References

Bach, K., & Harnish, R. (1984). Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

Brown, P., & S. Levinson (1978). Universal in Language usage. Politeness Phenomena. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & S. Levinson, (1987). Studies in interactional sociolinguistics, Politeness: some

universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bublitz, W., & Norrick, N. R. (2011). Foundations of pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Davies, B. L. (2008). Grice’s Cooperative Principle: Meaning and Rationality. Journal of Pragmatics, 39, 2308-2331.

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Hadi, A. (2013). A Critical Appraisal of Grice’s Cooperative Principle. University, Melboure, Australia: SciRes.

Klemencic, E., & Vogrincic, C. (2014). Analysis of Text in the Field of Education: A Regulation on Textbook Approval and a History Textbook. Available at  https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244014552430

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S. C. (2007). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Paltridge, B. (2012). Discourse Analysis. Bloomsbury Academic: Continuum Publishing Corporation.

Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. New York:  Free Press.

Searle, J. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(01), 1-23.

Searle, J.  (1975). Indirect Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.

Sebastian P. ( 2016). The Difference between Direct and Indirect Speech Acts. When Are Speech Acts Successful?, Munich, GRIN Verlag,  https://www.grin.com/document/341843  

The University of Sheffield. (2012). All About Linguistics.To Discover and Understand, Politeness Theory. https://sites.google.com/a/sheffield.ac.uk/aal2013/branches/pragmatics/example-research-face-theory-and-politeness.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Yule , G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 12/11/2022
Accepted: 03/07/2023
Published: 03/24/2023 
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-2107
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.22 

Rana Y. Abdullatif is an Instructor at the University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Iraq. She obtained the BA at College of Arts, University of Baghdad and MA from the College of Languages, Iraq.  Her interests are in pragmatics, semantics, and discourse analysis. ORCiD ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-2107

Hanan N. Al-bayati is an Assist. Instructor at the University of Baghdad, College of Languages, Iraq. She obtained the BA from the  College of Arts, University of Baghdad and MA at College of Arts, Banha University, Egypt. Her research interests are semantic, discourse analysis, and pragmatics. She is mainly interested in the influence of cultures on language use. Email: hanan.n@colang.uobaghdad.edu.iq ORCiD ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3752-7565