Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number1 March 2020                                                   Pp. 29-43
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.3   

Full Paper PDF 

 

Phonological Problems of Omani EFL Learners: Pedagogical Perspectives and
Implications

  Vijay Singh Thakur
  Department of English Language and Literature
College of Arts and Applied Sciences, Dhofar University
Salalah, Sultanate of Oman

 

 

 

Abstract:
Like many non-native learners, English is a Foreign Language to Omani learners; therefore, Spoken English turns out to be difficult and often problematic. Non-native learners of English face several phonological problems mainly because most languages follow specific, predictable rules of pronunciation, but English does not. There are native and non-native varieties of English, which differ not only in terms of vocabulary and grammar but also in pronunciation. In the backdrop of phonological differences between varieties of English and ensuing pronunciation problems, this action research was conducted to investigate the phonological problems that Omani learners at school level encounter. The study was based on focused observation using the diary as a tool for data collection for six months each in one (1) class of grade seven (7) and one (1) class of grade nine (9) in two Omani public schools. The total sample size was 100. The collected phonological data were coded and organized in terms of marked thematic categories. The recurrent problems which surfaced in the Spoken English of Omani learners involved in this study were pure vowel substitution for diphthongs «U and  eI, replacement of p by bsound, insertion of the vowel sound I while pluralizing the words, syllabification of initial and final consonant clusters, deletion ofs sound occurring as the final element from consonant clusters, the alternation between /dZand /g,  /Zand /dZ/,   /tS / and  /S /  sounds, replacement of  /tby /t5/ sound,  lengthening of certain vowel sounds, pronouncing ‘r’ in all phonetic environments, irregularities in the use of weak forms, and not following the rules of aspiration. Based on the emerging phonological problems, certain remedial activities were planned and used with the students, which helped improve their phonological problems considerably. These remedial activities are proposed and recommended as measures of pedagogical intervention.
Keywords: alternation of sounds, aspiration, consonant clusters, non-native varieties, Omani learners, phonetic environment, phonological problems, predictable rules, syllabification

Cite as: Thakur, V. S. (2020). Phonological Problems of Omani EFL Learners: Pedagogical Perspectives and Implications. Arab World English Journal11 (1) 29-43.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.3 

References    

Abbad (1998). An analysis of communicative competence features in English language texts in Yemen Arab   Republic. (Ph. D. Dissertation), University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois, USA.

Al Balushi, M. and Al Siyabi, F. (2016). Spelling strategies of Omani EFL students. English Linguistics  Research, 5 (3), 1-14.

Al Jadidi, H. S. S. (2009). Teaching English as a Foreign language in Oman: An exploration of English language teaching pedagogy in tertiary education. (Ph. D. Dissertation), Victoria University, Melbourne,  Australia. 

Al Mahrooqi, R. (2012). A student perspective on low English proficiency in Oman.
International Education     Studies5 (6), 263-271.

Al Yaqoobi, Z., Ali, F., & Sulan, N. (2016). An analysis of errors caused by Omani EFL learners in pronouncing certain consonant sounds. International Journal of Languages and Education and Applied  Linguistics, 5, 59-71.

Balasubramanian, T. (1981, rep. 1995). A textbook of English phonetics. New Delhi: Macmillan.

Bansal, R. K. (1993). Teaching spoken English in Colleges, In B. A. Prabhakar Babu (Ed.) Teaching Spoken English in Colleges (pp. 1-12). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.

Basit, T.N. (2010). Conducting research in educational contexts. Continuum International Publishing  Group.

Binturki, T. A. (2008). Analysis of pronunciation errors of Saudi ESL learners. (Unpublished Master  Dissertation), Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language teaching and learning. White Plains, New York:  Longman.

Cohen. L, Manion, L & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. New York: Routledge.

Dani, A. P. (1993). Spoken English practice for first year classes of Indian universities. In B. A. Prabhakar Babu (Ed.) Teaching Spoken English in Colleges, (pp. 23-24). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.

El Shorbagi, et al. (2017). The effectiveness of phonemic and phonological awareness program to improve reading performance of first grade basic education students in Oman. Journal of Educational and  Psychological Studies, 11 (3), 666-676.

Gebhard, J. G. (1999). Seeing teaching differently through observation. In J. G. Gerbhard and R. Oprandy (Eds.), Language teaching awareness, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gillette, G. W. (1994). On speaking terms: A practical guide to pronunciation to ABLE/ESL teachers.  Euclid, OH: Northeast ABLE Resource Centre.

Hameed, P. F. M. & Aslam, M. S. (2015). Pronunciation as a stumbling block for the Saudi English learners: An analysis of the problems and some remedies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies(8), 1578- 1585.

Nation, I. S. P., & Newton, J. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. New York: Routledge.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. & Carter, R. (2001). The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. London: Ernst Klett Sprachem.

O’Connor, J. D. (1980). Better English pronunciation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Patil, Z. N. (2002). Spoken English for Vietnamese learners. Hanoi: The Gioi Publishers.

Pennington, M. (1994). Recent research in L2 phonology: Implications for practice. London: Cambridge University Press.

Rabab’ah, G. (2003). Communicative problems facing Arab learners of English. Journal of Language and  Learning3 (1) 180-197.

Roach, P. (2009). English phonetics and phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Saraswathi, V. (1993).  In B. A. Prabhakar Babu (Ed.) An interactive approach to teaching spoken English,

(pp. 109-119). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.

Shastri, N. R. (1993). Teaching pronunciation. In B. A. Prabhakar Babu (Ed.) Teaching Spoken English in Colleges, (pp. 29-38). Hyderabad: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.

Wahba, E. (1998). Teaching pronunciation-why? Language Teaching Forum, 36, 3-32.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no1.3
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Dr. Vijay Singh Thakur, Associate Professor of English, is currently the Assistant Dean of the
College of Arts and Applied Sciences at Dhofar University, Salalah, Oman. He holds a doctorate
degree in Applied Sociolinguistics. His academic contributions include 2 books, 2 jointly edited
books, 30 research papers, and 20 presentations at international conferences in the fields of TESOL
Pedagogy, Discourse Stylistics and Cross-Cultural Pragmatics.