Views: 2,119
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 16. Number 4, December 2025 Pp.438-453
School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
This study examines the construction of writer identity among undergraduate English language students, comparing Jordanian students at the University of Jordan with their counterparts at San Diego State University. Through a methodology based on multi-method analysis, the overall importance of the research lies in analysing student essays written in two different educational contexts. Discourse-based interviews complement the tools to achieve the goal of this comparative design, which is to clarify and explore the impact of various educational contexts and international experience on the construction of academic writer identity among English as a second/foreign language students. The study employs a results-based method that examines students’ linguistic choices in their academic essays to investigate the impact of the rhetorical features used on the construction of their written identity. The results also reveal subtle differences in writing strategies, as shown by the greater use of first-person pronouns among Jordanian students. On the other hand, San Diego State University students show increased linguistic development, including more structured discussions with clear topic sentences and supporting details. The study concludes that there is a positive and significant relationship between international educational experience and the development of some aspects of academic writer identity.
Salman, A. (2025).Negotiating Writer Identity: A Comparative Study of Jordanian Undergraduate Students of English in Jordan and America. Arab World English Journal, 16(4):438-45
Abu Rabia, H. M. (2017). Undergraduate Arab international students’ adjustment to U.S. universities. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 131–139. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n1p131
Alasmari, J. (2022). Saudi Ph.D. sojourners’ construction of identities on Twitter: An online-ethnographic study in the United Kingdom. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 13(1), 147–166. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/comm1.21
Al-Dawoody Abdulaal, M. A. (2020). A cross-linguistic analysis of formulaic language and metadiscourse in linguistics research articles by natives and Arabs: Modelling Saudis and Egyptians. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(3), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.12
Al-Hajaya, N. A. (2016). Attitudes of Jordanian university students and professors towards the role of global English and its influence on the Arabic language and culture (Unpublished master’s thesis). Middle East University for Graduate Studies, Jordan
Alharbi, M. (2020). Reimagining the Ever-Changing Construct of Saudi Writerly Identity: A Heuristic Approach. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 254–271. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.17
Al Masaeed, K. (2020). Translanguaging practices in L2 Arabic study abroad: Beyond monolingual ideologies in institutional talk. Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12623
Almatarneh, A. H. M., Ab Rashid, R., & Yunus, K. (2018). The Academic Writing Experience of Jordanian Postgraduate Students at a University in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal, 9 (3), 248-257. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no3.17
Aminifard, A. (2020). A cross-cultural comparison of writer identity in ELT research articles. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 20(2), 1–20. https://readingmatrix.com/files/22-9961826m.pdf
Aull, L. L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication, 31(2), 151–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088314527055
Candarli, D., Bayyurt, Y., & Martı, L. (2015). Authorial presence in L1 and L2 novice academic writing: Cross-linguistic and cross-cultural perspectives. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.10.001
Crosthwaite, P., Cheung, L., & Jiang, F. (Kevin). (2017). Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes, 46, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.02.001
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.10.003
Danis, N. (2022). A corpus analysis of disciplinary identity in evaluative journal articles: A Systemic Functional Linguistics approach. English for Specific Purposes, 68, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.07.003
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1999). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203793206
Hamdan, N. N., & Ahmad, U. K. (2023). Asserting Authorial Identity through Stance and Voice: Expert vs. Novice Scientific Writers. Arab World English Journal, 14(2), 360–377. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.25
He, F. (2020). Identity construction in academic writing of student writers who use English as an additional language: A literature review. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 43(4), 506–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/CJAL-2020-0033
Hinkel, E. (2002). Second Language Writers’ Text: Linguistic and Rhetorical Features. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602848
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
Hyland, K. (2018). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication, 33(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316650399
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2017). ‘We believe that …’: Changes in an academic stance marker. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 139–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400498
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Ivanič, R. (1998). Writing and identity. The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kanwal, N., Shahnaz, A., & Gulzar, M. A. (2021). Academic writing and issues of identity: A focus on texts and practices of a postgraduate student. Erevna: Journal of Linguistics & Literature, 5(2), 35–50. Retrieved from https://journals.au.edu.pk/ojserevna/index.php/erevna/article/view/129
Jaradat, E. M. M., & Bakrin, H. (2017). Proficiency level and language learning strategies among Jordanian students at Universiti Utara Malaysia. Proceedings of the ICECRS, 1(1).
Kim, C. (2025). Evaluative Stance in L1 and L2 Argumentative Essays: A Corpus-Based Comparison. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(4), 998–1011. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i4.9029
Lee, S., & Park, H. I. (2023). “Changing patterns of interactive metadiscourse in English Teaching articles.” English Teaching, 78(2), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.78.2.202206.83
Leedham, M., & Fernandez‐Parra, M. (2017). Corpus linguistics in student academic writing: Mapping the territory. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 403–416). Routledge.
Li, Z. (2021). Authorial presence in research article abstracts: A diachronic investigation of the use of first-person pronouns. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, Article 100977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100977
Liu, Y., & Zhou, H. (2014). Reporting and stance in second language academic writing. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 483-497. https://doi.org/10.1515/cjal-2014-0029
Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English Proficiency on Academic Performance of International Students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60-71. https://doi.org/10.32674/jis.v5i1.443
Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1–2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
Matsuda, P. K. (2015). Identity in written discourse. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 35, 140–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000178
Norton, B. (2013). Identity and language learning: Extending the conversation (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Rahimivand, M., & Kuhi, D. (2014). An exploration of discoursal construction of identity in academic writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 1492–1501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.570
Ren, B. (2023). L2 writer identity construction in academic written discourse: A multi-case study (Doctoral dissertation, University of South Florida). USF Scholar Commons. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/etd/9920
Sheldon, E. (2009). From one I to another: Discursive construction of self-representation in English and Castilian Spanish research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 251–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2009.05.001
Swales, J. M. (2014). Create a research space: CARS model. In Academic writing for graduate students (3rd ed., pp. 328–329). University of Michigan Press.
Uysal, H. H. (2014). A cross-cultural study of indirectness and hedging in the conference proposals of English NS and NNS scholars. In A. Lyda & K. Warchał (Eds.), Occupying niches: Interculturality, cross-culturality and aculturality in academic research (pp. 179–195). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02526-1_12
Wang, M., & Parr, G. (2025). Chinese postgraduate students negotiating their academic writing and identities in an Anglophone context: A dialogic, decolonising case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 131, 102588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102588
Westphalen, L. (2005). Assessing the personal: Inclusion, anecdote, and academic writing. Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching, 2, 40–47. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1057066.pdf
Yue, C. (2024). We make viewpoints in different ways: the use of stance adverbials across academic levels and disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2435169
Zhang, L., & Wang, J. (2024). To be like a “scholar”: A study on the construction of authorial identity of Chinese EFL learners in academic writing: An intertextuality perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, Article 1297557. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1297557
Amani Salman is a PhD candidate at the Australian National University. She is studying linguistics at the School of Literature, Languages and Linguistics. She had a master’s in applied linguistics (Discourse Analysis) with a particular interest in cross-cultural perspectives of authorial presence in English academic texts. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9461-0510