Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Vol. 17, No.12. July 2026 Pp.213-236

M-AI – the force – be with you: Pre-Service Teachers’ Preparedness for Distance English Teaching

Department of English Language and Culture, Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia, Dražovská 4, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia

Corresponding Author: zsandorova@ukf.sk

Department of English Language and Culture, Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia, Dražovská 4, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia

Department of English Language and Culture, Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia, Dražovská 4, 949 01 Nitra, Slovakia

Abstract:

This study addresses whether Generation Z pre-service teachers of English as a Foreign Language are prepared to deliver artificial intelligence-supported online instruction. The main aim is to evaluate this preparedness through the lens of the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge framework. The significance of the study lies in identifying areas of competence that English language teacher education programmes should prioritise to better prepare future teachers for artificial intelligence-supported online language teaching. Drawing on a mixed-methods case study, the research analyses 22 Slovak master’s students enrolled in a distance-teaching methodology course, in which they were required to use at least one artificial intelligence-driven tool. Data were corroborated from lesson observations and video recordings and analysed using qualitative content analysis aligned with the three domains: technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. The findings indicate that most participants demonstrated moderate preparedness, while only a minority achieved high-level integrated competence, and a similar proportion showed low preparedness. Although students were generally able to operate artificial intelligence tools, pedagogical integration and language-focused instructional design were often weak. In particular, scaffolding, feedback, and explicit language-learning objectives were frequently underdeveloped. The results suggest that digital nativeness does not guarantee the pedagogically meaningful use of artificial intelligence and highlight the need to integrate artificial intelligence pedagogy, grounded in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge framework, into English as a Foreign Language teacher education.

Cite as:

Sándorová, Z., Vrábelová, V., & Kráľová, Z. (2026). M-AI – the force – be with you: Pre-Service Teachers’ Preparedness for Distance English Teaching. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL 17 (12)213-236

References:

Al-Azzawi, I. G. S., & Saeed, H. Q. (2026). Teachers’ perspectives on the challenges of incorporating AI chatbots into writing instruction for Arab EFL learners. Arab World English Journal, 17(1), 236–252. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol17no1.15

Alpysbayeva, N., Zholtaeva, G., Tazhinova, G., Syrlybayeva, G., & Assylova, R. (2025). Fostering pre-service primary teachers’ capacity to employ an interactive learning tool. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1530

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Aruğaslan, E. (2024). Examining the relationship of academic dishonesty with academic procrastination, and time management in distance education. Heliyon, 10(19), Article e38827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38827

Boumadan, M., Soto-Varela, R., Ortiz-Padilla, M., & Poyatos-Dorado, C. (2020). What Factors Determine the Value of an Online Teacher Education Experience from a Teacher’s Perspective? Sustainability, 12(19), Article 8064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198064

Cambridge University Press. (2025). Distance learning. In Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org

Çebi, A., & Reisoğlu, I. (2020). Digital Competence: A Study from the Perspective of Pre-service Teachers in Turkey. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 9(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2020.7.583

Çeşme, H., & Çimen, B.A. (2023). Through the Lens of EFL Teachers: Teaching Online on Lockdown. Arab World English Journal, 14(3) 255-275. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/ awej/vol14no3.16

Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, Article 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

Dolezal, D., Motschnig, R., & Ambros, R. (2025). Pre-Service Teachers’ Digital Competence: A Call for Action. Education Sciences, 15(2), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020160

European Commission. (2022). Ethical guidelines on the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and data in teaching and learning for educators. Publications Office of the European Union.

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Geçer, E., Bağci, H., & Atar, C. (2023). Nothing replaces meeting my students at class: Analysing academics’ views regarding distance education. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 16615–16636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11887-2

Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. R. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: Regressing or expanding? Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8415–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12174-w

Guerrero-Roldán, A.-E., Rodríguez-González, M. E., & Cortadas, P. (2021). Experiences in the use of an adaptive intelligent system to enhance online learners’ performance: A case study in Economics and Business courses. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00271-0

Harris, J. B., Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Iliasova, L., Nekrasova, I., Mena, J., & Estrada-Molina, O. (2025). Microteaching on pre-service teachers’ education: Literature review. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1562975. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1562975

Jamil, B., Shaoan, M. R., Lahinta, A. N., Irfan, S., & Arif, M. (2025). Empowering future educators: Digital literacy competence and preservice teachers´ practices in middle schools of Pakistan. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2541444

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating synchronous online language learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727

Mahyoob, M. (2020). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 351-362. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23

Matjašič, M., & Vogrinc, J. (2025). Supporting the Development of the Perceived and Actual Research Competence of Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 15(6), 652. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15060652

Metzner, O., Wang, Y., Symes, W., Huang, Y., Keller, L., de Melo, G., & Lazarides, R. (2025). A process-oriented perspective on pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy and their motivational messages: Using large language models to classify teachers’ speech. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(Suppl. 1), S73–S97. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12779

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, K. W. S., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). AI literacy: Definition, teaching, evaluation and ethical issues. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 504–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.487

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Osorio Vanegas, H. D., Segovia Cifuentes, Y. d. M., & Sobrino Morrás, A. (2025). Educational Technology in Teacher Training: A Systematic Review of Competencies, Skills, Models, and Methods. Education Sciences, 15(8), Article 1036. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15081036

Parz-Kovacic, B., Pölzl-Stefanec, E., & Walter-Laager, C. (2026). Considerations for the future of online professional development for early childhood educators. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 47(1), 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2025.2465756

Pondelíková, I. (2025). Enhancing university education in Slovakia: Pioneering AI tools for achieving excellence in the educational process of English language and anglophone cultures. University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava.

Puentedura, R. R. (2013). SAMR: A contextualized introduction. Hippasus. http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/000112.html

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu (Y. Punie, Ed.). Publications Office of the European Union. https://epale.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/pdf_digcomedu_a4_final.pdf

Rillig, M. C., Ågerstrand, M., Bi, M., Gould, K. A., & Sauerland, U. (2023). Risks and benefits of large language models for the environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(9), 3464–3466. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c01106

Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, Article 106586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106586

Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? AI and the future of education. Polity Press.

Seo, K., Tang, J., Roll, I., Fels, S., & Yoon, D. (2021). The impact of artificial intelligence on learner–instructor interaction in online learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00292-9

Sewart, D., Keegan, D., & Holmberg, B. (Eds.). (2020). Distance education: International perspectives. Routledge.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Tomczyk, Ł., Fedeli, L., Włoch, A., Libersa, C., Batorski, D., Bran, R., Falkowska, J., & Vegliante, M. C. (2023). Digital competences of pre-service teachers in Italy and Poland. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09626-6

Touretzky, D., Gardner-McCune, C., Martin, F., & Seehorn, D. (2019). Envisioning AI for K–12: What should every child know about AI? In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33(1), 9795–9799. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33019795

Turek, I. (2014). Didactics. Wolters Kluwer.

Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice teachers’ TPACK development: A review of the literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2018.1498039

Zaidi, N. N. A., Hashim, H., & Sulaiman, N. A. (2026). Educators’ perceptions and experiences of using artificial intelligence in the English language classroom: A systematic literature review. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence (3), 180–194. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI3.12

Zhang, L., Yang, C., & Zheng, Y. (2026). Digital competence for sustainable education of pre-service teachers: A systematic literature review (2014–2024). Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1710983. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1710983

Zydziunaite, V., Kaminskiene, L., & Jurgile, V. (2021). Teachers’ abstracted conceptualizations of their way in experiencing the leadership in the classroom: Transferring knowledge, expanding learning capacity, and creating knowledge. Education Sciences, 11(12), Article 782. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11120782

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg

Zuzana Sándorová is an Associate Professor at the Department of English Language and Culture, at the Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Her specialization includes developing intercultural communicative competencies of future English teachers and teaching English as a foreign language online. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8738-4737

Veronika Vrábelová is a full-time PhD student in the Didactics of English Language and Literature study programme at the Department of English Language and Culture, at the Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra. Her doctoral dissertation focuses on AI integration in pre-service teachers’ online micro-teaching. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5575-9528

Zdena Kráľová is a Professor of Language Pedagogy at the Department of English Language and Culture at the Faculty of Education, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, specializing in psychological aspects of foreign language learning. Her current research interests focus on  AI-supported brain-friendly EFL pronunciation learning. ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-9992