Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 14. Number 1 March 2023 Pp.3- 27
Investigating the Effects of Speaker Variability on Arabic children’s Acquisition of English Vowels
English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Corresponding Author: email@example.com
Bronwen G. Evans
Department of Speech, Hearing & Phonetic Sciences, University College London,
London, United Kingdom
Publisher Discovery Ltd, Bath, United Kingdom
Received:10/25/2022 Accepted:02/16/2023 Published: 03/24/2023
This study investigated whether speaker variability in phonetic training benefits vowel learnability by Arabic learners of English. Perception training using High-Variability stimuli in laboratory studies has been shown to improve both the perception and production of Second Language sounds in adults and children and has become the dominant methodology for investigating issues in Second Language acquisition. Less consideration is given to production training, in which Second Language learners focus on the role of the articulators in producing second language sounds. This study aimed to assess the role of speaker variability by comparing the effect of using High-Variability and Low-Variability stimuli for production training in a classroom setting. Forty-six Arabic children aged 9-12 years were trained on 18 Standard Southern British English vowels in five training sessions over two weeks and were tested before and after training on their vowel production and category discrimination. The results indicate that Low-Variability stimuli may be more beneficial for children, however, High-Variability stimuli may alter some phonetic cues. Furthermore, the results suggest that production training may be used to improve the perception and production of Second Language sounds, but also to inform the design of Second Language pronunciation learning programmes and theories of Second Language acquisition.
Keywords: Arabic Children’s acquisition of English, articulatory training, classroom setting of L2 learning,
production training, vowel learning, speaker variability
Cite as: Alshangiti, W., Evans, B. G., & Wibrow, M. (2023). Investigating the Effects of Speaker Variability on Arabic children’s Acquisition of English Vowels Arab World English Journal, 14 (1):3-27.
Akahane-Yamada, R., Strange, W., Downs-Pruitt, J., & Masuda, Y. (1998). Modification of L2 vowel production by perception training as evaluated by acoustic analysis and native speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(5), 3089-3089.
Alshangiti, W. M. M. (2015). Speech production and perception in adult Arabic learners of English: A comparative study of the role of production and perception training in the acquisition of British English vowels, (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University College London, United Kingdom.
Antoniou, M., & Wong, P. C. (2015). Poor phonetic perceivers are affected by cognitive load when resolving speaker variability. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(2), 571-574. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4923362
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., & Vallar, G. (1984). Exploring the articulatory loop. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 36(2), 233-252.
Baese-Berk, M. M. (2019). Interactions between speech perception and production during learning of novel phonemic categories. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 81, 981-1005.
Baker, W., & Trofimovich, P. (2006). Perceptual paths to accurate production of L2 vowels: The role of individual differences. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 44(3), 231-250.
Barriuso, T. A., & Hayes-Harb, R. (2018). High Variability Phonetic Training as a Bridge from Research to Practice. CATESOL Journal, 30(1), 177-194.
Bent, T., & Atagi, E. (2015). Children’s perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(6), 3985-3993.
Bent, T., & Atagi, E. (2017). Perception of nonnative-accented sentences by 5-to 8-year-olds and adults: The role of phonological processing skills. Language and Speech, 60(1), 110-122.
Best, C. T. (1995). A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. Speech perception and linguistic experience, 171-206.
Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception: commonalities and complementarities. Lang Exp. Second Lang. Speech Learn, 1334, 1-47.
Best, C. T., MacKain, K. S., & Strange, W. (1982). A cross‐language study of categorical perception for semi‐vowel and liquid glide contrasts. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(S1), S76-S76.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2016). Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0. 15 (2016).
Bond, M., & Fry, S. (1958). A bear called Paddington. London: Collins.
Bradlow, A. R., Pisoni, D. B., Akahane-Yamada, R., & Tohkura, Y. I. (1997). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2299-2310.
Camus, P. (2019). The effects of explicit pronunciation instruction on the production of second language Spanish voiceless stops: a classroom study. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(1), 81-103.
Carlet, A., & Cebrian, J. (2019). Assessing the effect of perceptual training on L2 vowel identification, generalization and long-term effects. A Sound Approach to Language Matters–In Honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn. Dept. of English, School of Communication & Culture, Aarhus University, 91-119.
Cibelli, E. (2022). Articulatory and perceptual cues to non-native phoneme perception: Cross-modal training for early learners. Second Language Research, 38(1), 117-147.
Cleland, J., Scobbie, J. M., Nakai, S., & Wrench, A. A. (2015, August). Helping children learn non-native articulations: The implications for ultrasound-based clinical intervention. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS), Glasgow, 10-14 August 2015. International Phonetic Association.
Cucchiarini, C. & Strik, H. (2018). Second Language Learners’ Spoken Discourse: Practice and Corrective Feedback Through Automatic Speech Recognition. In I. Management Association (Ed.), Smart Technologies: Breakthroughs in Research and Practice (pp. 367-389). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2589-9.ch016.
d’Apolito, S., Sisinni, B., Grimaldi, M., & Fivela, B. G. (2017). Perceptual and ultrasound articulatory training effects on English L2 vowels production by Italian learners. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Cognitive and Language Science, 11, 2447-2453.
Delvaux, V., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., & Harmegnies, B. (2013, August). Production training in second language acquisition: a comparison between objective measures and subjective judgments. In INTERSPEECH, Belgium (Vol. 2375, p. 2375-2379).
Ellis, N. C., & Beaton, A. (1993). Psycholinguistic determinants of foreign language vocabulary learning. Language learning, 43(4), 559-617.
Evans, B. G., & Alshangiti, W. (2018). The perception and production of British English vowels and consonants by Arabic learners of English. Journal of Phonetics, 68, 15-31.
Evans, B. G., & Martin-Alvarez, L. (2016). Age-related differences in second-language learning? A comparison of high and low variability perceptual training for the acquisition of English/i/-/ɪ/by Spanish adults and children. New Sounds, Aarhus University, Denmark.
Evers, K., & Chen, S. (2022). Effects of an automatic speech recognition system with peer feedback on pronunciation instruction for adults. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1869-1889.
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 92, 233-277.
Flege, J. E., & Bohn, O. S. (2021). The revised speech learning model (SLM-r). Second language speech learning: Theoretical and empirical progress, 3-83.
Flege, J. E., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1996). Lexical familiarity and English‐language experience affect Japanese adults’ perception of /ɹ/and/l. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(2), 1161-1173.
Flynn, N., & Foulkes, P. (2011, August). Comparing Vowel Formant Normalization Methods. International Congress for Phonetic Sciences, 683-686.
Giannakopoulou, A., Brown, H., Clayards, M., & Wonnacott, E. (2017). High or low? Comparing high and low-variability phonetic training in adult and child second language learners. Peer Journal, 5, e3209. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3209
Giannakopoulou, A., Uther, M., & Ylinen, S. (2013). Enhanced plasticity in spoken language acquisition for child learners: Evidence from phonetic training studies in child and adult learners of English. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29(2), 201-218.
Gorba, C., & Cebrian, J. (2023). The acquisition of L2 voiced stops by English learners of Spanish and Spanish learners of English. Speech Communication, 146, 93-108.
Harrington, B., & Engelen, J. (2004). Inkscape. Software available at http://www. inkscape. org.
Hattori, K. (2010). Perception and production of English/r/-/l/by adult Japanese speakers (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University College London, United Kingdom.
Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English/r/-/l/category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(1), 469-479.
Huensch, A., & Tremblay, A. (2015). Effects of perceptual phonetic training on the perception and production of second language syllable structure. Journal of Phonetics, 52, 105-120.
Hwang, H., & Lee, H. Y. (2015). The effect of high variability phonetic training on the production of English vowels and consonants. In International Congress for Phonetic Sciences. https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphsproceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0466.pdf
Ingvalson, E. M., Lansford, K. L., Federova, V., & Fernandez, G. (2017). Listeners’ attitudes toward accented speakers uniquely predicts accented speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(3), EL234-EL238.
Ingvalson, E. M., McClelland, J. L., & Holt, L. L. (2011). Predicting native English-like performance by native Japanese speakers. Journal of phonetics, 39(4), 571-584.
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2007). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems: Perception of formant targets, formant movement, and duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(5), 2842-2854.
Iverson, P., & Evans, B. G. (2009). Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(2), 866-877.
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English/r/-/l/to Japanese adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(5), 3267-3278.
Iverson, P. et al. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87(1), B47-B57.
Iverson, P., Pinet, M., & Evans, B. G. (2012). Auditory training for experienced and inexperienced second-language learners: Native French speakers learning English vowels. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(1), 145-160.
Jarrah, M. A. (1993). The Phonology of Madina Hijazi Arabic: A Non-linear Analysis. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Essex, United Kingdom.
Kartushina, N., & Martin, C. D. (2019). Speaker and acoustic variability in learning to produce nonnative sounds: evidence from articulatory training. Language Learning, 69(1), 71-105.
Kartushina, N., Hervais-Adelman, A., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Golestani, N. (2015). The effect of phonetic production training with visual feedback on the perception and production of foreign speech sounds. The journal of the acoustical society of America, 138(2), 817-832.
Kondaurova, M. V., & Francis, A. L. (2010). The role of selective attention in the acquisition of English tense and lax vowels by native Spanish listeners: Comparison of three training methods. Journal of phonetics, 38(4), 569-587.
Kvasyuk, E. N., Putistina, O. V., & Savateeva, O. V. (2021). The use of multimedia language laboratory in teaching English phonetics at the university. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 113, 00053). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202111300053
Linebaugh, G., & Roche, T. B. (2015). Evidence that L2 production training can enhance perception. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 9(1), A1-A17.
Lively, S. E., Logan, J. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (1993). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and speaker variability in learning new perceptual categories. The Journal of the acoustical society of America, 94(3), 1242-1255.
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49(2B), 606-608.
Logan, J. S., Lively, S. E., & Pisoni, D. B. (1991). Training Japanese listeners to identify English/r/and/l: A first report. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89(2), 874-886.
López, V. G., & Counselman, D. (2013). L2 acquisition and category formation of Spanish voiceless stops by monolingual English novice learners. In Proceedings of the 16th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 118-127.
Melnik-Leroy, G. A., Turnbull, R., & Peperkamp, S. (2022). On the relationship between perception and production of L2 sounds: Evidence from Anglophones’ processing of the French /u/–/y/ contrast. Second Language Research, 38(3), 581–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320988061.
Neri, A., Mich, O., Gerosa, M., & Giuliani, D. (2008). The effectiveness of computer assisted pronunciation training for foreign language learning by children. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 393-408.
Nishi, K., & Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Training Japanese listeners to perceive American English vowels: Influence of training sets. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 20(6),1496-1509. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/103).
Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of visual feedback on segmental production in the L2 classroom. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3), 173-192.
Sadakata, M., & McQueen, J. M. (2013). High stimulus variability in nonnative speech learning supports formation of abstract categories: Evidence from Japanese geminates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), 1324-1335.
Sakai, M., & Moorman, C. (2018). Can perception training improve the production of second language phonemes? A meta-analytic review of 25 years of perception training research. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 187-224.
Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2013a). Computer-based English/r/-/l/perceptual training for Japanese children. In Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics ICA2013, 19, (1). Acoustical Society of America.
Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2013b). Perceptual training effects on production of English/r/-/l/by Japanese speakers. In J. Przedlacka, J. Maidment., & M. Ashby (Eds.), Proceedings of the Phonetics Teaching and Learning Conference (pp. 83-86).
Shinohara, Y., & Iverson, P. (2021). The effect of age on English/r/-/l/perceptual training outcomes for Japanese speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 89, 101108.
Strange, W., Weber, A., Levy, E. S., Shafiro, V., Hisagi, M., & Nishi, K. (2007). Acoustic variability within and across German, French, and American English vowels: Phonetic context effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122(2), 1111-1129. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2749716
Taimi, L., Jähi, K., Alku, P., & Peltola, M. S. (2014). Children learning a non-native vowel-The effect of a two-day production training. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(6), 1229-1235, doi:10.4304/jltr.5.6.1229-1235.
Thomson, R. I. (2011). Computer assisted pronunciation training: Targeting second language vowel perception improves pronunciation. Calico Journal, 28(3), 744-765.
Thomson, R. I. (2018). High variability [pronunciation] training (HVPT): A proven technique about which every language teacher and learner ought to know. Journal of Second Language Pronunciation, 4(2), 208-231.
Tyler, M. D. (2019). PAM-L2 and phonological category acquisition in the foreign language classroom. A sound approach to language matters–In honor of Ocke-Schwen Bohn, 607-630.
Ueda, R., & Hashimoto, K. I. (2019). Perceptual Training in a Classroom Setting: Phonemic Category Formation by Japanese EFL Learners. Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Proceedings, 10(1), 213-249.
Wang, X., & Munro, M. J. (2004). Computer-based training for learning English vowel contrasts. System, 32(4), 539-552.
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English: The British Isles (Vol. 2). Cambridge University.
Wiener, S., Chan, M. K., & Ito, K. (2020). Do explicit instruction and high variability phonetic training improve nonnative speakers’ Mandarin tone productions?. The Modern Language Journal, 104(1), 152-168.
Wilson, I., Gick, B., O’Brien, M. G., Shea, C., & Archibald, J. (2006). Ultrasound technology and second language acquisition research. In Proceedings of the 8th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2006) (pp. 148-152). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Wong, J. W. S. (2013). The effects of perceptual and/or productive training on the perception and production of English vowels/ɪ/and/iː/by Cantonese ESL learners. Interspeech, 2113-2117.
Yuan, Q., & Archibald, J. (2022). Modified Input Training and Cue Reweighting in Second Language Vowel Perception. Frontiers in Educational Research, 5(6),65-75, DOI: 10.25236/FER.2022.050613.
Zhang, X., Cheng, B., Qin, D., & Zhang, Y. (2021). Is speaker variability a critical component of effective phonetic training for nonnative speech?. Journal of Phonetics, 87, 101071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2021.10107