Views: 296
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 17. Number 3, September 2026 Pp.189-210
Department of English, College of Arts, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
Department of English, College of Education, University of Al Maarif, Ramadi, Iraq
Department of English, College of Arts, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
Department of English, College of Arts, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Iraq
As a word formation process, compounding is essential to poetry because it enriches the poetic language, making it more compressed, concise, metaphorically dense, and effective. The article aims to investigate the morphosyntactic and metaphorical aspects of the compound words employed by the American poet Walt Whitman in his renowned poem Song of Myself. Whitman’s way of compounding words is a distinctive stylistic feature that sets his poetry apart from the work of other American poets. He created compound words that are unconventional and innovative. A Constructional Morphology (CM) approach has been employed to analyze the data. The Blending Theory of Metaphor (BTM) was also highly utilized in interpreting any metaphor encoded in the compound words. The data were solely collected from Song of Myself. A total of 627 compounds were identified and statistically analyzed, while 10 compounds were randomly selected and qualitatively analyzed. Whitman’s creation of compound words is driven by his intention to shed light on certain unique themes that are closely connected to his beliefs, visions, poetic identity, and outlook. This reveals a close connection between Whitman’s poetics and the morphosyntactic and metaphorical aspects of his compounds. The article concludes that the syntactic pattern adjective + noun is the most frequent type of compounds used in the poem. It also recommends future studies that further explore other morphosyntactic aspects in Whitman’s poetry such as neologisms and borrowings.
Ali, A. H., Abdullah, A.A., Gharkan, E.R., & Suleiman. H. A. (2026). Investigating Morphosyntactic Patterns and Metaphorical Interpretation of Compound Words in Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself: A Construction Morphology Approach. Arab World English Journal, 17(3): 189-210.
Abrams, M. H. (1999). A glossary of literary terms (7th ed.). Heinle & Heinle. https://mseffie.com/assignments/genre/Abrams%20Selections.pdf
Agarwal, S. (2017, April 21–22). Learning language and life skills through poetic corpus of Walt Whitman. Paper presented at the National Conference cum Workshop on Recent Trends in Technical Language and Communication: Emerging Requirements, India.
Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication (6th ed.). MIT Press.
Al-Mashhadani, O. A. B., Vengadasamy, R., & Salehuddin, K. (2024). Factors influencing comprehension of metaphors in academic reading texts among Iraqi EFL learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 15(2), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no2.19
Ali, A. H., & Ayyed, O. S. (2023). Exploring the techniques of creating images utilized by Sylvia Plath in her poetry. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 50(6), 141–153. https://doi.org/10.35516/hum.v50i6.7048
Ali, A. H., Khalaf, A. S., & Abdullah, M. Y. (2025). Metaphoric Configuration of Microsynecdoches in Emily Dickinson’s Poetry. An-Najah University Journal for Research – B (Humanities), 9999(9999). https://doi.org/10.35552/0247.a2721
Bao, H., He, K., Wang, Y., & Gao, Z. (2025). Exploring cognitive difference in poetry collection via large language models and metaphors: A case study of The Book of Songs. Cognitive Computation, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-025-10466-6
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S. (Eds.). (2000). Usage-based models of language. CSLI Publications.
Barðdal, J. (2008). Productivity: Evidence from case and argument structure in Icelandic. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.8
Bauer, L. (2009). Morphological productivity. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815706
Bauer, L., Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2015). The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2005). The grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic morphology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Booij, G. (2010). Construction morphology. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579266.001.0001
Booij, G. (2016). Construction morphology. In A. Hippisley & G. T. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 424–448). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139814720.017
Brinton, L. J. (2000). The structure of modern English: A linguistic introduction. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.97
Eppe, M., Maclean, E., Confalonieri, R., Kutz, O., Schorlemmer, M., Plaza, E., & Kühnberger, K.-U. (2018). A computational framework for conceptual blending. Artificial Intelligence, 256, 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2017.11.005
Fakih, A.-H. A., & A-Shawafi, N. A. (2015). Compounding as a near universal phenomenon with special reference to Standard Arabic nominal compounding. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 6(3), 120–136. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no3.8
Fatah, S. M. (2024). The fall of Walt Whitman’s I Hear America Singing ideals in Allen Ginsberg’s Howl. Koya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 7(1), 511–518. https://doi.org/10.14500/kujhss.v7n1y2024.pp511-518
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198700302.001.0001
Glayl, M. G. (2024). Walt Wittman: The Universal Poet and the American Ideal – A Socio-Cognitive Analysis. Anbar University Journal of Languages and Literature, 16(3), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.37654/aujll.2024.147000.1072
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S. (1999). Blending and metaphor. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 101–124). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.06gra
Gramley, S., Gramley, V., & Pätzold, K.-M. (2021). A survey of modern English (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Harley, H. (2006). English words: A linguistic introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Hilpert, M. (2024). Corpus linguistics meets historical linguistics and construction grammar: how far have we come, and where do we go from here?. Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory, 20(3), 481–504.
Hendrokumoro, Wijana, I. D. P., & Ma’shumah, N. K. (2024). Metaphorical representation of human body parts in Javanese. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 16(3), 775–798. https://jjmll.yu.edu.jo/index.php/jjmll/article/view/693
Hirsch, A. K. (2021). Witnessing and waiting in Walt Whitman’s democratic arts of attention. Humanities, 10(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/h10030085
Hoffmann, T., & Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001
Holmes, K. J., Flusberg, S. J., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). Compound words reflect cross-culturally shared bodily metaphors. Cognitive Science, 42(8), 3071–3082. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12671
Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B., & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A coursebook (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Karachun, Y., Haidenko, Y., & Borkovska, I. (2020). Compound term-nouns in electrical engineering texts: Structural, semantic and functional peculiarities. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Ukrainian Context, 142–160. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt3.13
Karrol, M., & Lyssova-Golomzina, E. (2026). Thresholds: The metaphorical foundations of powerful knowledge. The Curriculum Journal, 00, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.70079
Khair, B. B., Al Badarneh, A. F., Shehabat, A. K., Abu Seeni, A., & Al Ferain, S. S. (2022). A psychological and philosophical reading of human discourse in Walt Whitman’s Song of Myself. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p294
Khatin-Zadeh, O., Hu, J., & Banaruee, H. (2026). Metaphor as a process of propositional or imagistic source-target interaction: A review of five theories. New Ideas in Psychology, 80, Article 101217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2025.101217
Kim, J.-H. (2014). The syntagmatic relation of metaphoric compound words and cognitive linguistical analysis. Journal of Korean Linguistics, 70(1), 29–57.
https://doi.org/10.15811/jkl.2014..70.002
Knowles, M., & Moon, R. (2006). Introducing metaphor. Routledge.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408
Kumar, D., & Tayal, S. (2025). From Body to Soul: The Journey of the Self in Whitman’s Song of Myself. International Journal of Research in English, 7(1), 732–734.
https://doi.org/10.33545/26648717.2025.v7.i1k.429
Kuzmíková, J., & Kuzmík, J. (2024). Literary metaphor comprehension in the rational and experiential cognitive styles of human thinking. Jordan Journal of Modern Languages and Literatures, 16(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.16.2.16
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lane, E. (2024). Metaphor and ambiguity. Philosophical Studies, 181, 3059–3087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02252-1
Lawson, A. (2006). Walt Whitman & the class struggle. University of Iowa Press.
Mattiello, E., & Dressler, W. U. (2025). Verb-noun compounds versus synthetic compounds in English, German and Italian. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 61(2), 173–198. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2025-0021
Meng, Q., & Hilpert, M. (2024). Measuring the semantic headedness of English blends with token-based semantic vector space modeling: A corpus-based study. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 39(4), 1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqae050
Meyer, C. F. (2009). Introducing English linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Mitić, I., Janić Mitić, A., & Stamenković, D. (2025). Relating metaphor syntax to metaphor features: An empirical approach. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 12(1), Article 2497937. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2497937
Murphy, F. (Ed.). (2005). The complete poems of Walt Whitman. Penguin Classics.
Pham, T. G., & Nguyen, T. T. C. (2026). A contrastive study on conceptual metaphor “Women are supernatural forces” in 20th-century Vietnamese and American literature: A cognitive linguistic approach. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 32(1), 85–108. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2026-3201-06
Plag, I. (2003). Word-formation in English. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511841323
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
Ptiček, M., & Dobša, J. (2023). Methods of Annotating and Identifying Metaphors in the Field of Natural Language Processing. Future Internet, 15(6), 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060201
Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A university grammar of English. Longman.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.
Rehman, M. (2012). Technical innovations in Whitman’s poetry. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(15), 249–251.
https://ijhss.thebrpi.org/journals/Vol_2_No_15_August_2012/31.pdf
Reynolds, D. S. (2000). A historical guide to Walt Whitman. Oxford University Press.
Riedmann, C. M., Juhasz, B. J., Liversedge, S. P., & Zang, C. (2026). The English spaced compound word database. Behavior Research Methods, 58(230). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-026-03113-x
Suleiman, H. A., & Elmula, E. M. A. F. (2025). Metaphoric extension of adjectives used in D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers. An-Najah University Journal for Research – B (Humanities), 40(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.35552/0247.40.2.2533
Taylor, L. (1975). The American vocabulary, the colloquial style, and the oratorical mode: Influences on Whitman’s 1855 “Song of Myself” (Master’s thesis, University of North Carolina).
Tuten, N. L. (1992). The language of sexuality: Walt Whitman and Galway Kinnell. Walt Whitman Quarterly Review, 9(3), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.13008/2153-3695.1325
Wang, T., & Xu, X. (2025). Composition as nonlinear combination in semantic space: A computational characterization of compound processing. Cognitive Science, 49(5), e70039. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70039
Warren, J. (1995). Reading Whitman’s postwar poetry. In E. Greenspan (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Walt Whitman (pp. 45–67). Cambridge University Press.
Yang, C., Lu, S., Sun, R., Zhang, X., & Huang, Q. (2026). Rethinking Metaphor Evaluation: Aptness Judgments as a Cognitive Probe for Language Models. Cognitive Computation, 18(24). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-026-10567-w
Yu, Y. & Wang, T. (2026) Grammatical metaphor studies: historical review and outlook. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, 1774523. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1774523
Zhang, S. (2026). Corpus Fractum: Metaphors we hurt by. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102327
Ayad Hammad Ali is a professor at the University of Anbar. He has authored over 40 articles on different research areas, including Morphology, Semantics, Pragmatics, Syntax, Semiotics, Stylistics, Metaphor Studies and Translation Studies. He published three books specialized in Compounding Morphology (Modern Dictionary), Grammar, and Phraseology. He also participated in numerous international and national conferences held in Iraq and abroad. He was a member of the Editorial Board of AUJLL (2014 – 2018) and a member of the Editorial Board of the International Journal of Language and Linguistics (2018 – 2022). ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5976-8311
Abdullah AbuBakr Abdullah is a researcher and instructor at the University of Al Maarif. His research interests include postcolonial literature, resistance literature, and critical literary theory. He is particularly interested in exploring the intersections of identity, power, and cultural resistance in literary texts, as well as applying contemporary theoretical approaches to the study of literature. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3905-8487
Estabraq Rafea Gharkan (Corresponding Author) is a researcher and instructor at the University of Anbar. His research focuses on Indigenous North American poetry, decolonial theory and postcolonial studies. He is also interested in doing research in stylistics and investigating morpho-syntactic aspects in literary works. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2735-4784
Hanaa Abbass Suleiman is a researcher and instructor at the University of Anbar. Her research focuses on Sociolinguistic issues. She is also interested in doing research in syntax and semantics, and investigating metaphorical aspects in literary works. Her doctoral dissertation investigates semantic extension and metaphorical transference of adjectives used in D. H. Lawrence’s Sons and Lovers by applying specific semantic approaches. ORCD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-7293-3086