Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number3 September 2020 Pp. 372 -384
Introducing Socrative as a Tool for Formative Assessment in Saudi EFL Classrooms
Ameera Saeed Alharbi
English Language Center, Umm Alqura University
Makkah, Saudi Arabia
English Language Institute, King Abdulaziz University
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
English Language Institute, Kind Abdulaziz University
Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
As one of the most popular Online Student Response Systems (OSRSs), Socrative is defined as a web-based platform that can be accessed using any browser that is connected to the Internet (Mork, 2014). In an attempt to guide EFL teachers on their journey towards transforming their traditional paper-based formative assessment into using electronic tools, this study seeks to present the expectations and attitudes of Saudi female learners towards the use of mobile-based formative assessment. The study aims to investigate the attitudes of EFL learners towards the use of mobile-based tests in English classes using Socrative as a model for assessment. For this purpose, 35 female students completed all three stages of the experiment; initial survey, Socrative quiz, post-experiment survey. The participants are enrolled in one of the courses of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) offered by the Preparatory Year Program at a Saudi state university. The findings of the study indicate that almost half of the participants preferred paper-based over mobile-based tests in the pre-experiment survey; after the experiment, however, the students changed their preferences in favor of mobile-based tests. The study also highlighted different advantages, reported by the participants, of using Socrative as a tool for formative assessment in EFL classrooms. The study recommends that teachers implement the use of (OSRSs) in their classrooms as they have many pedagogical benefits for language learners.
Keywords: EFL classroom formative assessment, mobile-based testing, paper-based testing, Socrative, Online Student Response Systems (OSRSs).
Cite as: Alharbi, A. S., & Meccawy, Z. (2020). Introducing Socrative as a Tool for Formative Assessment in Saudi EFL Classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11 (3) 372-384.
Abdulla, M. H. (2018). The use of an online student response system to support learning of Physiology during lectures to medical students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2931-2946. DOI:10.1007/s10639-018-9752-0
Awedh, M., Mueen, A., Zafar, B., & Manzoor, U. (2014). Using Socrative and Smartphones for the support of collaborative learning. International Journal on Integrating Technology in Education, 3(4), 17-24. DOI: 10.5121/ijite.2014.3402
Balta, N., Perera-Rodríguez, V.-H., & Hervás-Gómez, C. (2018). Using Socrative as an online homework platform to increase students’ exam scores. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 837-850.
Balta, N., & Tzafilkou, K. (2019). Using Socrative software for instant formative feedback in physics courses. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 307-323.
Chou, P.-N., Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-H. (2017). BYOD or not: A comparison of two assessment strategies for student learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 74, 63-71.
Deichman, J. (2014). Socrative 2.0: for a school librarian, Socrative 2-0 is an effective and easy tool for keeping tabs on students’ progress. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 72-74.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Guarascio, A. J., Nemecek, B. D., & Zimmerman, D. E. (2017). Evaluation of students’ perceptions of the Socrative application versus a traditional student response system and its impact on classroom engagement. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(5), 808-812.
Hobbs, M., & Keddle, J. (2007). Commerce 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kim, H.-S. (2019). The Use of Socrative and Kahoot! in English Grammar. Learning, 22(4), 57-78.
Luxton, D. (2019). Low-stakes Testing, Technology and Learning. Assessment, Feedback, and Retrieval, (Special Issue), 84-87.
Macglynn, K., & Kelly, J. (2017). Using Formative Assessments to Differentiate Instruction. Science for All, 41(2), 22-25.
Mohamad, M., Lestari, D. D., Zahidi, A. M., & Matore, M. E. M. (2019). Socrative in Teaching Tenses: Indonesian Students and Lecturers’ Perceptions. Creative Education, 10(1), 140-150.
Mork, C.-M. (2014). Benefits of using online student response systems in Japanese EFL classrooms. JALT CALL Journal, 10(2), 127-137. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v10n2.171
Ohashi, L. (2015). Enhancing EFL writing courses with the online student response system Socrative. Kokusaikeiei Bunkakenkyu, 19(1), 135-145.
Pérez Garcias, A., & Marín, V. I. (2016). Ethics Issues of Digital Contents for Pre-Service Primary Teachers: A Gamification Experience for Self-Assessment with Socrative. IAFOR Journal of Education, 4(2), 80-96.
Showbie. (2019). Socrative. In. Canada: Socrative.com.
Turan, Z., & Meral, E. (2018). Game-Based versus to Non-Game-Based: The Impact of Student Response Systems on Students’ Achievements, Engagements and Test Anxieties. Informatics in Education, 17(1), 105-116. DOI: 10.15388/infedu.2018.07
Waluyo, B. (2018). Promoting Self-Regulated Learning with Formative Assessment and the Use of Mobile App on Vocabulary Acquisition in Thailand. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 105-124.
Woodrow, L. (2018). Introducing Course Design in English for Specific Purposes. New York: Routledge.
Yarahmadzehi, N., & Goodarzi, M. (2020). Investigating the Role of Formative Mobile Based Assessment in Vocabulary Learning of Pre-Intermediate EFL Learners in Comparison with Paper Based Assessment. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 181-196. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.690390
Yoon, S. Y. (2017). Using Learner Response Systems in EFL Classrooms: Students’ Perspectives and Experience. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 20(2), 36-58. DOI: 10. 15702/mall.2017.20.2.3