Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 14. Number 1 March 2023 Pp. 105–119
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.7
English Teachers’ Use of Multiple Modalities
Nibal AbdelKarim Mousa Malkawi
Department of English Language and Literature
Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan
Nazzem Mohammad Abdullah Attiyat
Department of English Language and Literature
Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan
Corressponding Author: nazzem70@bau.edu.jo
Fatima Mohammad Hasan Ismael
Al Albayt University , Jordan
Atika Mohammad Hasan Ismael
Department of English Language and Literature
Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan
Mahmoud Ali Ibrahim Rababah
Department of English Language and Literature
Al-Balqa Applied University, Jordan
Received:10/06/2022 Accepted:02/24/2023 Published: 03/24/2023
Abstract:
Integration of Information, Communication, and Technology helps instructors meet the global need for substituting technology-based teaching and learning tools and services for conventional teaching techniques. English teachers can customise learning for students, and thus it is important to explore new subjects and provide goal-focused training to students. Thus, motivating teachers to use technology and develop their teaching styles to emphasise good teaching is important. Teachers should stop seeing technology as an obstacle to learning. Self-efficacy theory relates to the expectancy-value framework, and motivation is based on the expectation of outcomes through a given course of action. Fundamental psychological needs can also be met with the help of motivation, which eventually increases the desire to undertake competent activities. This study revealed the importance of teachers’ technological skills to connect well with students and help them complete their tasks efficiently. Different theories, such as attribution and self-efficacy, have also been incorporated to understand the effectiveness of different tools and technologies. This method could improve students’ ability to learn new languages and their communication skills. This study recommends using information tools, as they effectively improve teaching methods and strategies. Information tools are considered strong and constructive tools that allow teachers to improve their strategies and communicate with students. Besides, it is also effective to incorporate lesson plans that can enhance the scope of students’ use of technologies to study and gather relevant ideas about various language and linguistic topics.
Keywords: Attribution theory, English language teachers, Jordanian teachers, multiple modalities, self-efficacy theory, technology
Cite as: Malkawi, N.A.M., Attiyat, N. M.A., Ismael, F. M. H., Ismael , A. M.H., & Rababah, M. A. I. (2023). English Teachers’ Use of Multiple Modalities. Arab World English Journal, 14 (1) 05—119.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no1.7
Alharahsheh, H. H., & Pius, A. (2020). A review of key paradigms: Positivism VS interpretivism. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 39-43. DOI: 10.36348/gajhss.2020.v02i03.001
Arnseth, H. C., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2010). Challenges in aligning pedagogical practices and pupils’ competencies with the Information Society’s demands: The case of Norway. In S. Mukerji & P. Triphati (Eds.), Cases on technological adaptability and transnational learning: Issues and challenges (pp. 266-281). Hershey: IGI global. https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/challenges-aligning-pedagogical-practices-pupils/42541
Batane, T., & Ngwako, A. (2017). Technology use by pre-service teachers during teaching practice: Are new teachers embracing technology right away in their first teaching experience? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(1), 48–61. https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/2299
Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. Available at https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584
Bolander, W., Chaker, N. N., Pappas, A., & Bradbury, D. R. (2021). Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(3), 462-481. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Willy-Bolander/publication/348323783_Operationalizing_salesperson_performance_with_secondary_data_aligning_
practice_scholarship_and_theory/links/5ffbc2ea92851c13fe02f310/Operationalizing-salesperson-performance-
with-secondary-data-aligning-practice-scholarship-and-theory.pdf
Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
Danaa H. M., Al-mzary M. M., Halasa W. N., Obeidat L. M., Al-Alawneh M. K., Rababah, M. A. (2022). University students’ ambition levels and vocational tendencies associated with common culture. The Education and Science Journal, 24 (6), 153–176. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2022-6-153-176
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first-and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational technology research and development, 47(4), 47-61. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02299597
Finger, G., Albion, P., Jamieson-Proctor, R., Cavanagh, R., Grimbeek, P., Lloyd, M., … & Romeo, G. (2013). Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF) Project TPACK Survey: Summary of the key findings. Australian Educational Computing, 27(3), 13-25. http://acce.edu.au/sites/acce.edu.au/files/pj/journal/AEC27-3_Finger-etal.pdf
Grabe, M., & Grabe, C. (2007). Integrating technology for meaningful learning (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Graham, S. (2022). Self-efficacy and language learning–what it is and what it isn’t. The Language Learning Journal, 50(2), 186-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2022.2045679
Heafner, T. L., Hartshorne, R., & Thripp, R. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of research on emerging practices and methods for k-12 online and blended learning. IGI Global. Available at https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3ayMDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR1&dq=+Handbook+of+research+on+emerging+practices+and+methods+for+k-12+online+and+blended+learning.+&ots=OKdxefgiXa&sig=BkrZCpIbrKKXdPL-NkGp3xY16Mw
into practice. Seminar.Net, 14(2), 216–224.
Khokhar, A.J., & Javaid, S. (2016). Students and teachers perceptions of ICT use in classroom: Pakistani classrooms. https://www.academia.edu/download/56065332/Paper_5.pdf
Lawrence, J.E., & Tar, U.A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
Lestari, N. (2019). Improving the Speaking Skill by Vlog (video blog) as Learning Media: The EFL Students Perspective. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(1), 915-925. http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v9-i1/5490
Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2017). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy, instruction, and assessment. Journal of Education, 197(2), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741719700202
Loomis, D. K., & Paterson, S. (2018). A comparison of data collection methods: Mail versus online surveys. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(2), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1494418
Mao, J., Ifenthaler, D., Fujimoto, T., Garavaglia, A., & Rossi, P.G. (2019). National policies and educational technology: A synopsis of trends and perspectives from five countries. Tech Trends, 63(3), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00396-0
Mekouar, L., Bader, M., & Belqasmi, F. (2021, October). The super-node topology in collaborative learning. In Proceedings of the 22st Annual Conference on Information Technology Education (pp. 67-68). Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3450329.3476846
Nakata, Y., Nitta, R., & Tsuda, A. (2022). Understanding motivation and classroom modes of regulation in collaborative learning: An exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1846040
Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 403-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012
Ng’ambi, D., Brown, C., Bozalek, V., Gachago, D., & Wood, D. (2016). Technology-enhanced teaching and learning in South African higher education–A rearview of a 20-year journey. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(5), 843-858. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12485
Nim Park, C., & Son, J. B. (2009). Implementing computer-assisted language learning in the EFL classroom: Teachers’ perceptions and perspectives. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 5(2), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.5172/ijpl.5.2.80
Obeidat, L. M., Momani, H. I., Ammari, T. T., & Rababah, M. A. (2022). Athletic identity and its relationship to moral values among physical education university students. Образование И Наука = Education and Science, 24(3), 41–77.
https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-3-41-77.
Obeidat, L. M., Momani, H. I., Hayajneh, W. S., Ammari, T. T., Al-mzary, M. M., & Rababah, M. A. (2022). Values system relationship to leadership behavior of practicing and non-sports-practicing university students. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 869-894. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15347a
Proceedings of the Asian conference on technology in the classroom 2016, Kobe, Japan.
Ranellucci, J., Rosenberg, J., & Poitras, E. (2020). Exploring pre-service teachers’ use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy-value theory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/jcal.12459
Rao, P. S. (2019). Collaborative learning in English language classrooms. ACADEMICIA: An International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 5-16. DOI: 10.5958/2249-7137.2019.00020.X
Read, D., Coles, S., Frey, J., & Littlefield, B. (2013). Investigating the use of virtual Learning Environments by teachers in schools and colleges. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/342377/1/DRead_VLE_report.pdf
Resta P., Laferrière T., McLaughlin R., & Kouraogo A. (2018). Issues and Challenges Related to Digital Equity: An Overview. In J. Voogt, G. Knezek, R. Christensen, & K.W. Lai (Eds.), Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, (pp. 987-1004). Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3319-53803- 7_67-1
Shaver, K. G. (2016). An introduction to attribution processes. Routledge. Available at https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781315536019/introduction-attribution-processes-kelly-shaver
Sileyew, K. J. (2019). Research design and methodology. In E. Abu-Taieh, A. El Mouatasim, A. Al Hadid (eds.), Cyberspace
(pp. 1-12). Rijeka: IntechOpen. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.85731.
Tondeur, J. (2018). Enhancing future teachers’ competencies for technology integration in education: Turning theory
Tondeur, J., Pareja Roblin, N., van Braak, J., Voogt, J., & Prestridge, S. (2017). Preparing beginning teachers for technology integration in education: Ready for take-off? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(2), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1193556
Žukauskas, P.; Vveinhardt, J.; Andriukaitiene, R. (2018). Philosophy and Paradigm of Scientific Research. the chapter. In ˙ Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility; Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., Andriukaitiene, R., Eds.; BoD–Books on Demand: ˙ Norderstedt, Germany Available at https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=UMaPDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA121&dq=%C5%BDukauskas,+P.,+Vveinhardt,+J.
,+%26+Andriukaitien%C4%97,+R.+(2018).+&ots=pG4NcHOmNF&sig=mnIO1dLFXDxFubXX733q2UzS7P8