Views: 2,971
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 11. July 2025 Pp. 81-95
Department of English, University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Hue University, Vietnam.
Department of Foreign Languages, University of Economics, Technology for Industries, Vietnam.
While online, information and communication technology (ICT)-mediated collaborative writing (CW) is an adopted activity in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing instruction, little research has examined students’ perceptions of peer feedback in this environment in depth. This study explores how learners metaphorically perceive peer feedback during ICT-supported collaborative essay writing activities. A total of 36 English-major students enrolled in a writing course that integrated Google Docs, Padlet, and a Learning Management System (LMS) into collaborative activities were asked to generate metaphors to describe their perceptions of the feedback they received from peers. The findings indicate that students employed a range of conceptual structures to represent their perceptions, reflecting diverse viewpoints on peer feedback in ICT-supported CW contexts. Through their metaphorical expressions, students primarily conceptualized ICT-mediated peer feedback in terms of its perceived value, specifically, its usefulness for writing tasks, the potential emotional or academic cost to recipients, and the unique mode of its delivery. The study demonstrates that metaphor analysis offers valuable insights into students’ perceptions of ICT-mediated peer feedback, particularly in understanding its transformative potential. The findings suggest the necessity of collectively integrating ICT tools into writing instruction and the urgent need to train students in giving and handling peer feedback to enhance their use of ICT in collaborative learning environments.
Nhung, P.T.H., & Ha, N. T.T. (2025). EFL Learners’ Metaphorical Perceptions of Peer Feedback in ICT-mediated Collaborative Writing. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (11):81-95
Abrams, Z. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22-42.
Albesher, K. B. (2024). The effect of Google-mediated collaborative writing on English as a second language students’ global and local writing features. SAGE Open, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241290034
Alwaleedi, M. (2022). Attitudes of learners at the Arabic Language Institute at King Abdulaziz University towards Online Collaborative Writing during Covid-19 Pandemic. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 2, 302-316.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.20
Azmi, N. (2017). The benefits of using ICT in the EFL classroom: From perceived utility to potential challenges. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(1), 111-118. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n1p111
Bailey, D., & Lee, A. R. (2020). An exploratory study of Grammarly in the language learning context: An analysis of test-based, textbook-based and Facebook corpora. TESOL International Journal, 15(2), 4-27.
Cao, T. X. L. (2023). Benefits and challenges of using LMS in blended learning: Views from EFL teachers and students at a Vietnamese public university. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 3(3), 78-100. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijte.23335
De Guerrero, M. C. G., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052
Dizon, G., & Gayed, J. M. (2021). Examining the impact of Grammarly on the quality of mobile L2 writing. The JALT CALL Journal, 17(2), 74-92. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n2.336
Do, N. D., Nguyen, H. M., Chu, T. A., & Nguyen, H. T. (2023). The use of Padlet in EFL writing classes in Vietnam: From teachers’ perspectives. AsiaCALL, ASSEHR, 744, 167-176. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-042-8_15
Ennis, M. J., Verzella, M., Montanari, S., Sendur, A. M., Simeonova Pissarro, M., Kaiser, S., & Wimhurst, A. (2021). A telecollaboration project on giving online peer feedback: Implementing a multilateral virtual exchange during a pandemic. Journal of Language and Education, 7(4), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2021.11914
Fisher, L. (2017). Researching learners’ and teachers’ beliefs about language learning and metaphor. In S. Wortham, D. Kim & S. May (Eds.), Discourse and Education, Encyclopedia of Language and Education (pp. 329-339). Springer.
Fitzpatrick, A. (2004). Information and communication technology in foreign language teaching and learning – An overview. Russian Federation.
Ghasemi, B., & Hashemi, M. (2011). ICT: New wave in English language learning/teaching. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3098-3102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.252
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. Y. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710.
Hashmi, N. (2016). Implementing multi-media as a pedagogical tool in an EFL classroom: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Arts and Humanities, 5(9), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v5i9.999
Huang, J. (2022). Exploring the affordances of digital annotation tools for collaborative academic writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 56, 101085. DOI:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101499
Huang, W., & Feng, D. (2019). Exploring the dynamics of motivation for learning Japanese among Chinese learners: An elicited metaphor analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(7), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1571071.
Illana-Mahiques, E. (2021). Re-thinking peer reviewing in the virtual context: The roles of giving and receiving online feedback in L2 Spanish classrooms. Languages, 6, 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages6030151.
Ishak, C. N. (2019). Metaphorical analysis of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of ESP. Indonesia EFL Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 5(1), 56-76.
Jin, L., Liang, X., Jiang, C., Zhang, J., Yuan, Y., & Xie, Q. (2014). Studying the motivations of Chinese young EFL learners through metaphor analysis. ELT Journal, 68(3), 286-299. DOI:10.1093/elt/ccu011
Kim, H. J. (2022). A study on the use of Padlet in non-face-to-face liberal arts English classes and university students’ responses. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and Media, 23(1), 1-12. DOI:10.26689/ief.v1i2.5625
Knowles, M., & Moon, R. (2004). Introducing metaphor. Routledge.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Johnson metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Li, J., & Zou, W. (2021). A study of pre-service teachers’ perceptions of task-based language teaching via metaphor analysis in a Chinese context. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1989287.
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2021). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in EFL collaborative writing groups using Google Docs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 1-22.
Lin, W., & Yang, S. C. (2011). Exploring students’ perceptions of integrating Wiki technology and peer feedback into English writing courses. English Teaching: Practice and Critique,10(2), 88-103.
Liu, J., & Hansen, J. G. (2002). Peer response in second language writing classrooms (2nd ed.). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8952.
Low, G. (2015). A practical validation model for researching elicited metaphor. In W. Wan & G. Low (eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp. 15–37). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Ma, X., & Gao, X. (2017). Metaphors used by pre-service teachers of Chinese as an international language. Journal of Education for Teaching, 43(1), 71-83.
Martínez-Carrasco, R., & Roldán-Riejos, A. (2020). Fostering metacognitive awareness in collaborative writing through digital platforms: A case study in ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 114-126.
Nguyen, D. C. (2016). Metaphors as a window into identity: A study of teachers of English to young learners in Vietnam. System, 60, 66-78. DOI:10.1016/j.system.2016.06.004
Nguyen, T. H. N., & Nguyen, T. T. H. (2022). Use of Google Docs in teaching and learning English online to improve students’ writing performance. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 2(2), 186-200.
Nguyen, T. T. H., & Pham, T. H. N. (in press). EFL learners’ perceived engagement with peer feedback in ICT-enhanced collaborative writing. In S. Yu & I. Lee (Eds.) Peer feedback in second language writing: Learner cognition and engagement. Routledge.
Nguyen, T. T. L. (2020). Integrating ICT into collaborative writing: Are we ready yet? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(1), 243-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.1.16.243
Okyar, H. (2023). University-level EFL students’ views on learning English online: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 81-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11155-9
Ortega, L. (2018). Ontologies of language, second language acquisition, and world Englishes. World Englishes, 37(1), 64-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12303
Pham, H. T. P. (2022). Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: Student feedback and revision in EFL writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(9), 2112–2147. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530
Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing and reflective thinking: Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914554
Rezai, A., Rahul, D. R., Asif, M., Omar, A., & Reshad Jamalyar, A. (2022). Contributions of E- portfolios assessment to developing EFL learners’ vocabulary, motivation, and attitudes. Education Research International, 1-11. https:// doi.org/10.1155/2022/5713278
Sağlamel, H., & Çetinkaya, Ş. E. (2022). Students’ perceptions towards technology-supported collaborative peer feedback. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 189-206.
Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394. https://doi.org/10.46743/21603715/2005.1854
Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1629601
Sheerah, H. A. H. (2020). Using blended learning to support the teaching of English as a foreign language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 6,191- 211. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.13
Strobl, C., & Baten, K. (2023). The impact of different modes of online collaborative writing on product quality and process characteristics. Journal of Second Language Writing, 59, 100933.
Thai, N. H. T., & Nguyen, T. N. (2022). The impact of collaborative writing via Padlet on students’ writing performance and their attitudes. Proceedings of HCMCOUJS, 17(2), 25-39.
Van Hoe, A., Wiebe, J., Slotta, J., Rotsaert, T., & Schellens, T. (2024). Designing dialogic peer feedback in collaborative learning: The role of Thinq Tank. Education Sciences, 14, 1231. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111231
Wan, W., & Low, G. (2015). Introduction. In W. Wan & G. Low (Eds.), Elicited metaphor analysis in educational discourse (pp. 1–12). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Wan, W., Low, G. D., & Li, M. (2011). From students’ and teachers’ perspectives: Metaphor analysis of beliefs about EFL teachers’ roles. System, 39(3), 403–415
Warschauer, M., & Liaw, M. (2021). Digital support for collaborative writing among language learners: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(5), 1304-1318.
Wu, W. Y., Huang, J. Y., Han, C. W., & Zhang, J. (2022). Evaluating peer feedback as a reliable and valid complementary aid to teacher feedback in EFL writing classrooms: A feedback giver perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 73. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140.
Wu, Y., & Miller, L. (2021). Improving EFL students’ argumentative writing through online mind-mapping and collaborative writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(8), 1119-1143.
Yeh, H. C., Tseng, S. S., & Chen, Y. S. (2019). Using online peer feedback through Blogs to promote speaking performance. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 1-14.
Yu, S. (2024). Peer assessment in writing instruction. Cambridge University Press.
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016). Peer feedback in second language writing (2005-2014). Language Teaching, 49(4), 461-493. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444816000161
Zhang, M. (2019). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16-30.
Zhou, W., Simpson, E., & Domizi, D. P. (2012). Google Docs in an out-of-class collaborative writing activity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 24(3), 359-375.
Pham Thi Hong Nhung is a lecturer of Hue University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Vietnam. She holds an MA and a PhD in Applied Linguistics from the University of Queensland, Australia. She has published in different platforms including RELC Journal, Language Testing in Asia, Language-Related Research, and Issues in Educational Research.
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9621-8482
Nguyen Thi Thanh Ha has been teaching English at the University of Economics – Technology for Industries and is currently pursuing her doctoral studies at Hue University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Vietnam. Her academic research concentrates on utilizing new ICT platforms and tools for language education to promote student collaboration.
Orcid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-0794