Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number 4 December 2022                                    Pp.454-467
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.30

Full Paper PDF 

Effectiveness of In-House Materials on Academic Reading Proficiency of College-Level
Omani Students
 

Sarath Withanarachchi Samaranayake
Department of International Language Teaching
Silpakorn University, Thailand
Corresponding Author: SAMARANAYAKE_S@su.ac.th

Suneeta Kositchaivat
  Department of International Language Teaching
Silpakorn University, Thailand

Patteera Theienpermpool
Department of International Language Teaching
Silpakorn University, Thailand

 

Received:07/25/2022         Accepted:11/24/2022                 Published12/15/2022

 

Abstract:
Most preparatory students studying at the universities of technology and applied sciences in Oman demonstrate a low proficiency in academic reading. As a result, most students stop their studies at the certificate level without pursuing a higher qualification. Given this issue, this study was conducted to promote level three preparatory students’ academic reading proficiency. This study may inspire reading instructors who teach in EFL contexts and depend on commercially produced materials to develop in-house materials appropriate for their students. The research question this study attempted to answer was whether the application of in-house materials helps tertiary-level EFL students to perform better in a standardized reading test (Cambridge Reading B2 First). The study consisted of two treatments and two comparison groups (N = 84), instructed using in-house materials (treatment groups) and the prescribed textbook (comparison groups) for one semester. At the end of the intervention, the data were analyzed using descriptive and paired-sample t-tests to determine whether the intervention affected the performance of the treatment groups in the post-test than the comparison groups. The findings indicated a statistically significant (p < .001) difference in B2 First Cambridge English Reading Test between the pre-test and the post-test for the treatment group showing a significant improvement in reading proficiency. Based on the findings, it can be concluded that in-house materials are more effective in helping English Foreign Language tertiary level students improve their reading proficiency than commercially produced textbooks in EFL programs in Omani technological education.
Keywords: Commercial English Textbooks, in-house materials, intervention, Omani tertiary education, reading proficiency

Cite as: Samaranayake, S. W., Kositchaivat, S., & Thienpermpool, P. (2022). Effectiveness of In-House Materials on Academic Reading Proficiency of College-Level Omani Students. Arab English World Journal, 13(4) 454-467.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.30

References

Allwright, R. (1981). What do we want teaching materials for? ELT Journal, 36 (1), 5–18.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/36.1.5

Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in
Reading Comprehension. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive

            Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 37-55). Cambridge: CUP.

Blanchard, K., & Root, C. (2005). Ready To Ready Now: A Skills-Based Reader. Pearson  Education, NY 10606.

Boakye, N. (2021). Using role play and explicit strategy instruction to improve first-year students’

academic reading proficiency. Reading & Writing, 12(1), 1–12.  doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v12i1.285

Cambridge English: Preliminary (PET) for Schools. (2015). Retrieved from

http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams/preliminary/exam-format/

DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics

           and Cognitive Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667275

Donato, R., (2000). Sociocultural contributions to understanding the foreign and second language

classroom. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 27–50). Oxford University Press.

Dudley-Evans, T., & John, M. J. S. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A

            Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Faridi, A. (2010). The development of context-based English learning resources for elementary

Schools in Central Java. Excellence in Higher Education, 1, 23-30.  http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/ehe.2010.13

General Foundation Programs. (n.d.). Oman Academic Standards for General Foundation

            Programs. Retrieved from http://www.oaaa.gov.om/Program.aspx#GeneralFoundation

Grabe, W. (1988). Reassessing the Term “Interactive.” In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey

(Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp. 56–70). Cambridge: CUP.       http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524513.008

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A learner-centered approach.

Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511733031

Hugo, V. (1862). Les Miserable. A. Lacroix, Verboeckhoven & Cie.

IBM Corp. Released (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.

Leipzig, D. H. (2001). What is reading? WETA. Retrieved from Reading Rockets:
http://www.readingrockets.org/article/352/

Mayer, R. E.  (2001). Multimedia learning. NY: Cambridge University Press.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603

Ohta, A. S. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: developmentally appropriate assistance in the

zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.),

Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford University Press.

Parker, C. A., Holand, G., & Jones, D. (2013). The Effectiveness of Two Reading Interventions

Programs in a South Texas Urban School District. National Forum of Applied Educational

            Research Journal, 26(3), 1-9.

Pretorius E., & Naudé, H. (2002). A culture in transition: Poor reading and writing ability among

children in South African Townships. Early Child Development and Care, 172, 439-449.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03004430214552

Riazi, A. M. (2003). Methodology and Material design in Language teaching: Current perceptions

and practices and their implications, Anthology series 44. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional

Language Center.

Richard, J. C. (n.d.). The role of textbooks in a language program. Retrieved from

www.professorjackrichards.com/articles/role-of-textbooks

Samaranayake, S. W. (2017). Academic writing issues of foundation level students: The

            effectiveness of context-specific teaching materials using a process genre approach to

            writing [Doctoral dissertation, The University of South Africa]. South Africa. Available at

http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/22795

Sass, E. J. (1989). Motivation in the College Classroom: What Students Tell Us. The teaching of

            Psychology, 16 (2), 86-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top1602_15

Shinas College of Technology, (2015). Test Results Analysis of 2017-18. Retrieved from

fac_result_analysis/student management system, Shinas College of Technology

Tomlinson, B. (2003). Developing Materials for Language Teaching. Continuum. London.

Tuzlukova, V., Eltayeb, C., & Gilhooly, A. (2013). Encouraging Creative Reading in EFL

            Classroom. Retrieved from http://www.litu.tu.ac.th/journal/FLLTCP/Proceeding/237.pdf

Quality Assurance Department of Shinas College of Technology. (2017). General

            Foundation Program- Test Results Analysis. Retrieved  from

http://www.shct.edu.om/elc-foundation-program

Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Leroux, A., Roberts, G., Denton, C., Barth, A., & Fletcher, J. (2012).

Effects of Intensive Reading Intervention for Eighth-Grade Students With Persistently

Inadequate Response to Intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(6), 515-525.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022219411402692

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 07/25/2022
Accepted: 11/24/2022
Published: 12/15/2022 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-726X
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.30

Sarath Withanarachchi Samaranayake (Ph.D.) is an English lecturer at the Department of International Language Teaching at Silpakorn University, Thailand. He has published several articles in peer-reviewed international journals. His interests include teaching and researching in the domains of ESL and EFL. ORCid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6352-726X

 Suneeta Kositchaivat (Ph.D.) is an assistant professor at the Department of International Language Teaching at Silpakorn University, Thailand. Her primary interests include communicative language teaching, English camp activities, and English project work. ORCid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8300-727X

 Patteera Theienpermpool (Ph.D.) is a lecturer at the Department of International Language Teaching at Silpakorn University, Thailand. Her major interests concern vocabulary, material development, testing and evaluation, and language education technology.
ORCid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9049-2912