Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 16. Number 1, March 2025 Pp.298-308

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.18

Effective Methods for Teaching English Grammar to University EFL Learners in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study of Inductive and Deductive Approaches

Saleh Mohammad Alsakaker

Department of English, College of Education, Majmaah University,
Al-Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia

s.alsakaker@mu.edu.sa

Abstract:

This study is a comparative investigation of the impact of inductive and deductive teaching approaches. The aim of this study is to investigate which approach to teaching grammar was more effective for helping Saudi Arabian EFL undergraduate students acquire grammatical proficiency in English. A second objective was to shed light on the students’ preferences between the two approaches. The study is significant as the findings of this research can contribute to improved student outcomes by suggesting the best teaching strategy for Saudi students to learn English grammar. The author seeks to address the following question: Do inductive and deductive teaching approaches have similar effects on Saudi university-level EFL students’ learning of English grammar? A quantitative research design was employed with a sample of 42 undergraduate EFL university students, who were divided into an inductive group and a deductive group. Their knowledge of English grammar was assessed with pre- post-treatment tests, followed by administration of a Likert scale questionnaire eliciting the students’ perceptions of these approaches. The results indicated a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0025) favoring the inductive group. This outcome suggests that the positive impact of the inductive approach exceeded that of the deductive approach. The students’ preference results revealed that they slightly preferred the inductive approach, but the difference between groups was not statistically significant. These findings suggest that university students should learn grammar inductively. Additionally, teachers and researchers should be encouraged to incorporate an inductive teaching approach in their curricula and studies to enhance learning outcomes.

Cite as:

Alsakaker, S. M. (2025). Effective Methods for Teaching English Grammar to University EFL Learners in Saudi Arabia: A Comparative Study of Inductive and Deductive Approaches. Arab World English Journal, 16(1):298-308

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.18

References:

Abdukarimova, N. A., & Zubaydova, N. N. (2021). Deductive and inductive approaches to teaching grammar. JournalNX, 372-376.

Ausubel, D. P. (1964). Adults versus children in second-language learning: Psychological considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 48(7), 420–424.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1964.tb04523.x

Badpa, H. (2024). A new perspective towards teaching grammar: Inductive or deductive? A case study of Iranian elementary EFL learners. International Journal of Language and Translation Research, 4(2), 29-44.

Bastone, R. (1994). Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Celce-Murcia, M. (Ed.). (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (2nd ed.). Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114–138). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Donalo, L., Beyerlein, N., & Fiero, S. (2017). Different approaches to teaching grammar. TEFL Tales: TEFL teacher stories, ESL tips and interviews with TEFL employers. Retrieved from http://www.teflexpress.co.uk/blog

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.

Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339-368.

Eriksson, L. (2014). The effectiveness of modified inductive versus deductive teaching: A case study on word order amongst a group of English as a foreign language learners. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12332.67200

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). How can EFL teachers help EFL learners improve their English pronunciation? Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(5), 967– 972. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0705.18

Gorat, L., & Prijambodo, V. L. (2013). The effect of using deductive approach and inductive approach in teaching English to students on their conditional sentence mastery: An experimental study. Magister Scientiae, (33), 78-92.

Gulsanam, K. (2024). Implement of inductive methods in teaching grammar. European Journal of Business Startups and Open Society, 4(5), 266-268. https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.2011835X.17610

Haight, C. E., Herron, C., & Cole, S. P. (2007). The effects of deductive and guided inductive instructional approaches on the learning of grammar in the elementary foreign language college classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 40(2), 288-310.

Hammerly, H. (1975). The deduction/induction controversy. The Modern Language Journal, 59(1–2), 15–18.

Hatch, E., & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. New York: Newbury House.

Huang, Z. (2005). Grammar teaching as product or as process? Sino-US English Teaching, 2(11), 27-31.

Jong-Won, K. (2007). A comparative study of the effects of explicit-inductive/cooperative instruction versus explicit-deductive/individualistic instruction on the second language acquisition of English relative clauses in Korean university-level EFL learners. Published Dissertation. Alliant International University, San Diego, California.

Kaur, S., & Niwas, R. (2016). Effectiveness of deductive and inductive methods in teaching English grammar at elementary level. International Journal of Advanced Research, 4(7), 1241- 1247. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/1027

Kuder, E. (2009). Implications of an inductive versus deductive approach to SLA grammar instruction (Doctoral dissertation, University of Delaware).

Lock, G. (1997). Functional English grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mahjoob, E. (2015). A comparison of the effectiveness of inductive vs. deductive instruction of grammar to EFL students. Journal of Language, Linguistics and Literature, 1(5), 164-169.

Mallia, J. G. (2014). Inductive and deductive approaches to teaching English grammar. Arab World English Journal, 5(2). Retrieved from https://awej.org/images/AllIssues/Volume5/Volume5Number2June2014/17.pdf

Moranski, K., & Zalbidea, J. (2022). Context and generalizability in multisite L2 classroom research: The impact of deductive versus guided inductive instruction. Language Learning, 72(S1), 41-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12487

Mountone, P. (2004). How to use examples effectively: Deductive vs. inductive approaches. University of California, Santa Barbara.

Negahdaripour, S., & Amirghassemi, A. (2016). The effect of deductive vs. inductive grammar instruction on Iranian EFL learners’ spoken accuracy and fluency. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(1), 8-17. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.5N.1P.8

Nur, S. (2020). Students’ perception toward the use of deductive and inductive approaches in teaching English grammar. TESOL International Journal, 15(1), 6-19.

Petrovitz, W. (1997). The role of context in the presentation of grammar. ELT Journal, 51(3), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.3.201

Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing grammar. Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla147

Rauf, A., Hamid, S., & Khan, W. A. (2023). Effect of inductive and deductive teaching on learning English grammar for undergraduate students. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 10(2), 212-228. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v10i2.836

Rivers, W. M., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. Oxford University Press.

Robinson, P. (1996). Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search, and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 27-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100014674

Shaffer, C. (1989). A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages. The Modern Language Journal, 73(4), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.2307/326874

Sik, K. (2015). Tradition or modernism in grammar teaching: Deductive vs. inductive approaches. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197: 2141-2144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.340

Vogel, S., Herron, C., Cole, S. P., & York, H. (2011). Effectiveness of a guided inductive versus a deductive approach on the learning of grammar in the intermediate-level college French classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 44(2), 353-380.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01133.x

Widodo, H. P. (2006). Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 5(1), 122-141. Retrieved from http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/2006v5n1nar1.pdf

Younie, W. J. (1974). Instructional approaches to slow learning. Teachers’ College Press. New York.

Keywords

Deductive approach, EFL undergraduates, grammar teaching, inductive approach, learners’ perceptions

About the author

Dr. Saleh Alsakaker holds the position of Assistant Professor in the English Department at the College of Education, Majmaah University. He obtained his Doctorate from Indiana University and his Master’s degree from Southern Illinois University, both located in the United States. With an extensive teaching portfolio that encompasses thirteen years of experience, Dr. Alsakaker’s research interests are primarily focused on Applied Linguistics, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, and TESOL.
ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9510-9939

Share Now