Views: 1,151
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 17. Number 1, March 2026 Pp.19-33
Euromed Research Centre, Euromed Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
Language Centre, Euromed University of Fes (UEMF)
Fès, Meknès Road, 30000 Fes, Morocco
Writing continuous to be one of the most cognitively challenging skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, particularly at the tertiary level where academic proficiency is crucial. The existing platforms often fail to meet the specific pedagogical needs of EFL writing instruction, despite advances in digital language learning tools. This study presents the design of Right4U, a mobile-friendly web application aimed at enhancing academic writing skills among first-year university EFL students. Guided by a modified User-Centered Design (UCD) approach, the project engaged students, instructors, and developers collaboratively throughout the process. The resulting web-app incorporates interactive writing modules, scaffolded learning paths, peer-review forums, and real-time instructor feedback, grounded in process writing and task-based learning principles. A mixed-methods pilot study, including pretest-posttest analysis and System Usability Scale (SUS) evaluation, demonstrated measurable improvements in students’ writing skills and high user satisfaction. The findings confirm the significance of UCD in developing pedagogically effective m-learning applications and indicate promising directions for future research and technological enhancement.
Chadli, E. M. (2026). Designing the Web Application ‘Right4U’ to Enhance EFL Writing Skills: A User-Centered Prototyping Approach. Arab World English Journal, 17(1): 19-33.
Ahmadian, M. J. (2016). Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. In R. Bhandari (Ed.), Second language acquisition: Recent trends (pp. 178–182). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501503399-001
Al-Harrasi, A. S., Al-Khanjari, Z. A., & Sarrab, M. (2015). A new design approach formobil learning application using user-centered design. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(11), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.14257/ijseia.2015.9.11.02
Brooke, J. (1986). System usability scale (SUS): a quick-and-dirty method of system evaluation user information. Reading, UK: Digital Equipment Co Ltd, 43, 1–7.
Brooke, J. (1996). SUS: A quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jordan, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35
Butler, L. (2013). Longman academic writing series 4: Essays (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Chuah, K. M., & Kabilan, M. K. (2022). The development of mobile applications for language learning: a systematic review of theoretical frameworks. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.15
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Farooqui, A. (2023). Writing Assignments Difficulties, Factors, and Solutions: ESL Teachers’ Perspectives. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 14 (4): 358-371. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no4.22
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003004943
Gould, J. D., & Lewis, C. (1985). Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think. Communications of the ACM, 28(3), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.1145/3166.3170
Houde, S., & Hill, C. (1997). What do prototypes prototype? In M. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human–computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 367–381). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044481862-1/50082-0
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511667251
Hyland, K. (2007). Teaching and researching writing (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003198451-8
International Organization for Standardization. (2010). Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO 9241-210:2010). ISO. https://doi.org/10.3403/30388991
Johannsen, F., Knipp, M., Loy, T., Mirbabaie, M., Möllmann, N. R., Voshaar, J., & Zimmermann, J. (2023). What impacts learning effectiveness of a mobile learning app focused on first-year students? Information Systems and e-Business Management, 21(3), 629-673.
Kakumanu, L. (2025). Harnessing AI in CALL: Theories, Pedagogies, and Applications for Adult Language Learning. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 16(3): 144-158. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no3.8
Koole, M. (2009). A model for framing mobile learning. In M. Ally (Ed.), Mobile learning: Transforming the delivery of education and training (pp. 25–47). Athabasca University Press. https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/2322
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning. Mobile Learning: A Handbook for Educators and Trainers. Oxon: Routledge, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344006230726
Kujala, S. (2003). User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290301782
Lowdermilk, T. (2013). User-centered design: A developer’s guide to building user-friendly applications. O’Reilly Media.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1987). User-centered system design: New perspectives on human–computer interaction. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/b15703
Park, Y. (2011). A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(2), 78–102. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i2.791
Pegrum, M., Oakley, G., & Faulkner, R. (2013). Schools going mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handheld technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.64
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human–computer interaction (4th ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.3.15lee
Qoura, A. A. S. (2022). The effectiveness of a constructivist program on EFL students’ writing proficiency. International Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 34–50.
Sharples, M., Taylor, J., & Vavoula, G. (2007). A theory of learning for the mobile age. In R. Andrews & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of e-learning research (pp. 221–247). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607859.n10
Snyder, C. (2003). Paper prototyping: The fast and easy way to design and refine user interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-155860870-2/50044-9
Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing, and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v8i2.346
Warriner, J. E., & Griffith, F. (2006). Warriner’s English grammar and composition teacher’s manual (2nd ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
Zain, D. S. M., & Bowles, F. A. (2021). Mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) for higher education instructional practices in EFL/ESL contexts: A recent review of literature. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 283-307.
Dr. El Mehdi Chadli holds a PhD in English Studies at USMBA, with a scholarly focus on the integration of educational technology in EFL teaching and learning. His teaching experience includes English for Communication, Business English, and research methodology. He is currently a university English instructor at Euromed Research Centre, Euromed Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Language Centre, Fes, Morocco. https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1336-5067