Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Covid 19 Challenges April 2021 Pp.295-306
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.22
Challenges and Benefits of Web 2.0-based Learning among International Students of English
during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Cyprus
Isyaku Hassan
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Musa BaraU Gamji
Department of Mass Communication
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria
Eastern Medtrenian University (EMU), Cyprus
Corresponding Author: bmgamji@gmail.com
Qaribu Yahaya Nasidi
Department of Mass Communication
Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Kaduna State, Nigeria
Mohd Nazri Latiff Azmi
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Kuala Terengganu, Malaysia
Received: 2/15/2021 Accepted: 3/2/2021 Published: 4/26/2021
Abstract:
There has been an increased reliance on Web-based learning, particularly in higher learning institutions, due to the outbreak of Covid-19. However, learners require knowledge and skills on how to use Web 2.0-based learning tools. Thus, there is a need to focus on how Web-based tools can be used to enhance learning outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to explore the challenges and benefits of Web 2.0-based learning among international students of English as a Second Language (ESL) at the Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU), North Cyprus during the Covid-19 pandemic. The data were collected from a purposive sample of 15 ESL learners at EMU using focus group interviews. The interview data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. The findings showed that challenges faced by international students of English at EMU during the Covid-19 pandemic include inadequate knowledge of technology and technical issues such as poor internet connectivity, inability to upload large files, and loss of password. Additionally, the findings showed that Web 2.0 technologies can help the students to enhance collaborative learning, independent learning, flexible learning, as well as competence in using technology for learning purposes. It was envisaged that this study would be beneficial to the management of higher learning institutions, educationists, and students in general. However, this study is limited to international ESL students at EMU with a few participants. To provide generalizable outcomes, further studies may adopt a quantitative or mixed-method approach.
Keyword: Covid-19, Cyprus, ESL learners, international students, learning culture, Web 2.0
Cite as: Hassan, I., Gamji, M. B., Nasidi, Q.Y. & Azmi, M. N. L. (2021). Challenges and Benefits of Web 2.0-based Learning among International Students of English during the Covid-19 Pandemic in Cyprus. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Covid 19 Challenges (1) 295-306.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.22
References
Abdul Rahman, A. M. A., Azmi, M. N. L., & Hassan, I. (2020). Improvement of English Writing Skills through Blended Learning among University Students in Malaysia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12A), 7694-7701.doi: 10.13189/ujer.2020.082556
Abdullahi, A., Rouyan, N. M., Almetairi, M. R., Hassan, I. (2020). Process-oriented writing via computer-mediated peer reviewing: The case of English inner circle learners of Arabic as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9 (4), 3043-3047
Abdullahi, A., Rouyan, N. M., Noor, S. S. M., & Bashir, I. (2018). The application of Web 2.0 tools to determine receptive skills among Malay learners of the Arabic language at Universiti Sultan Zainul Abidin (UniSZA). E-Academia journal, 7(8), 1-7.doi: 10.24191/e-aj.v7iSI-TeMIC18.5379.
Aljawarneh, S. A. (2020). Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of computing in higher education, 32(1), 57-73.doi: 10.1007/s12528-019-09207-0
AlJeraisy, M. N., Mohammad, H., Fayyoumi, A., & Alrashideh, W. (2015). Web 2.0 in education: The impact of discussion board on student performance and satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(2), 247-258.
Al-Samarraie, H., & Saeed, N. (2018). A systematic review of cloud computing tools for collaborative learning: Opportunities and challenges to the blended-learning environment. Computers & Education, 124(1), 77-91.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.016
Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2008). What is middle class about the middle classes around the world? Journal of economic perspectives, 22(2), 3-28. doi: 10.1257/jep.22.2.3
Brown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors’ adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31(2), 1-10.doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001
Bugawa, A. M., & Mirzal, A. (2018). The impact of Web 2.0 technologies on the learning experience of students in higher education: A review. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 1-17.doi: DOI: 10.4018/IJWLTT.2018070101
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education. London and New York: Routledge.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 17(3), 217-230.doi: 10.1080/0268051022000048228
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-method approaches (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications
Eastern Mediterranean University (EMU) (2021). International Students List. Retrieved from: https://www.emu.edu.tr/prospectivestudents
Eshet, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
Goss, J. D., & Leinbach, T. R. (1996). Focus groups as alternative research practice: experience with transmigrants in Indonesia. Area, 28(2), 115-123.
Hoic-Bozic, N., Dlab, M. H., & Mornar, V. (2015). Recommender system and web 2.0 tools to enhance a blended learning model. IEEE Transactions on Education, 59(1), 39-44. doi: 10.1109/TE.2015.2427116
Hoq, M. Z. (2020). E-Learning during the period of pandemic (COVID-19) in the kingdom of Saudi Arabia: an empirical study. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(7), 457-464. doi:10.12691/education-8-7-2
Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2020). The problem with flexible learning: Neoliberalism, freedom, and learner subjectivities. Learning, Media and Technology, 18(1), 1-12. 10.1080/17439884.2020.1833920
Hursen, C. (2020). The Effect of Problem-Based Learning Method Supported by Web 2.0 Tools on Academic Achievement and Critical Thinking Skills in Teacher Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 15(1), 1-19.doi: 10.1007/s10758-020-09458-2
Ignatow, G., & Robinson, L. (2017). Pierre Bourdieu: theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society, 20(7), 950-966.doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519
Jackson, P. (1998). Focus group interviews as a methodology. Nurse Researcher, 6(1), 72.
Kakosimos, K. E. (2015). Example of a micro-adaptive instruction methodology for the improvement of flipped classrooms and adaptive-learning based on advanced blended-learning tools. Education for chemical engineers, 12(1), 1-11.doi: /10.1016/j.ece.2015.06.001
Mahyoob, M. (2020). Challenges of e-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Experienced by EFL Learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 11(4), 51-362. doi:10.24093/awej/vol11no4.23
Martinez, J. (2020). Take this pandemic moment to improve education. EduSource. Retrieved from https://edsource.org/2020/take-this-pandemic-moment-to-improve- education/633500 .
Martinez-Lopez, R., Yot-Domínguez, C., & Trigo, M. E. (2020). Analysis of the internet use and students’ Web 2.0 digital competence in a Russian university. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 12(3), 316-342.doi: 10.1504/IJTEL.2020.107986
McLafferty, I. (2004). Focus group interviews as a data collecting strategy. Journal of advanced nursing, 48(2), 187-194. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03186.x
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, media, and technology, 38(4), 355-367.doi: 10.1080/17439884.2013.783597
Mishra, L., Gupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(1), 1-8. doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
Mouchantaf, M. (2020). The COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges Faced and Lessons Learned Regarding Distance Learning in Lebanese Higher Education Institutions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(10), 1259-1266.doi: 10.17507/tpls.1010.11
Nedeva, V., & Dineva, S. (2012, November). New learning innovations with Web 4.0. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Virtual Learning, Bucharest, Romania.
O’Reilly, K. (2005). Key concepts in ethnography. New York: SAGE Publications.
Özad, B. E., & Barkan, M. (2004). Open Learning: Communicating with the Learner. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 3(3), 43-48.
Pachler, N., & Daly, C. (2009). Narrative and learning with Web 2.0 technologies: towards a research agenda. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 6-18.doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00303.x
Palaigeorgiou, G., & Grammatikopoulou, A. (2016). Benefits, barriers, and prerequisites for Web 2.0 learning activities in the classroom. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 13(1), 2-18.doi: 10.1108/ITSE-09-2015-0028
Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Casillas-Martín, S. (2017). Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72(1), 632-643.doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.071
Prasad, P. W. C., Maag, A., Redestowicz, M., & Hoe, L. S. (2018). Unfamiliar technology: Reaction of international students to blended learning. Computers & Education, 122(1), 92-103. 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.016
Prensky, M. (2003). Digital game-based learning. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/950566
Rahimi, E., van den Berg, J., & Veen, W. (2015). Facilitating student-driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers & Education, 81(1), 235-246.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.012
Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144 (1), 103-701.doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701
Sarfo, F. K., & Yidana, I. (2016). University lecturers experience in the design and use of MOODLE and blended learning environments. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 6(2), 143-154.
Vesisenaho, M., Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Hartikainen, A., & Karkkainen, S. (2010). Blended learning with everyday technologies to activate students’ collaborative learning. Science Education International, 21(4), 272-283.
Wang, M. J. (2010). Online collaboration and offline interaction between students using asynchronous tools in blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 830-846. doi: https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1045
Wang, M., Chen, Y., & Khan, M. J. (2014). Mobile cloud learning for higher education: A case study of Moodle in the cloud. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(2), 254-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1676
Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41-49. doi 10.1007/s11519-007-0001-5