Views: 2,246
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, No. 3. 2026. Pp.88-101
College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
Artificial intelligence has quickly invaded the realms of both creative and information-based writing, raising new questions about human originality, authorship and style. Despite its ability to produce writings that are coherent and stylistically varied, there are still concerns over the uniqueness and cultural neutrality of AI programs such as ChatGPT. This review covers significant recent advancements with artificial intelligence applications in both the literary and non-literary fields. It analyzes 35 recent studies contrasting authorship and creativity, or stylistic considerations and impressions, between human and AI texts. These studies range from poetic and fictional writing through essay, news article and academic publications. Six main topics emerged: Reconfiguring Authorship and Creativity in AI-Generated Literature; Disentangling Human and AI Authorship in informative and Creative Writing; Cultural Stereotyping, Stylistic Homogenization and Creative Constraints in AI-Generated Literary Content; Audience Perception, Misidentification and Heuristics in Informative Discourse; Educational Applications and Authorship Detection in AI-Generated vs. Human Texts; and Integration of AI into Special Research Fields such as Law, Criminology, Literature Reviews and Social Media. In particular, it was determined that though AI may have the ability to mirror humans on the basis of grammar, structure and at times a degree of creative literacy, it does not possess the capacity to address matters of deep emotional resonance and cultural context. However, at times humans cannot easily discern between texts written by AI and those authored by humans themselves, calling confidence and authority into question. Future studies could focus on how cultural background impacts the responses of people to AI-generated content, particularly in educational environments of colleges and universities.
Khedr, N. A., & Abbas, N. F. (2026). AI in Literary and Non-Literary Discourse: A Systematic Review of Human and Machine Authorship, Style and Perception. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, (3):88-10
Abbas, N. F., Awad, Z. E., & Mohaisen, A. K. (2025). YouTube as a Learning Tool Among EFL Learners: A Systematic Review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (11):96-110. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call11.6
Ajalo, E., Mukunya, D., Nantale, R., Kayemba, F., Pangholi, K., Babuya, J., Akuu, S. L., Namiiro, A. M., Nsubuga, Y. B., Mpagi, J. L., Musaba, M. W., Oguttu, F., Kuteesa, J., Mubuuke, A. G., Munabi, I. G., & Kiguli, S. (2025).Widespread use of ChatGPT and other artificial intelligence tools among medical students in Uganda: A cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE, 20(1), Article e313776. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0313776
Al Omari, O., Alshammari, M., Al Jabri, W., Al Yahyaei, A., Aljohani, K. A., Sanad, H. M., Al-Jubouri, M. B., Bashayreh, I., Fawaz, M., AlBashtawy, M., Alkhawaldeh, A., Qaddumi, J., Shalaby, S. A., Abdallah, H. M., AbuSharour, L., Al Qadire, M., & Aljezawi, M. (2024). Demographic factors, knowledge, attitude and perception and their association with nursing students’ intention to use artificial intelligence (AI): A multicentre survey across 10 Arab countries. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), Article 1456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06452-5
Al Qaradaghi, A. (2025). Infallible or fallible for students’ use? Interdownload and confessions with OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Alustath Journal for Human and Social Sciences, 64(2), Article 1. DOI: 10.36473/2zaxcp93
AlAbdouli, S., Alomosh, A., BouNassif, A., & Nasir, Q. (2023). Artificial intelligence systems’ importance in the analysis of crimes and their patterns. Al-Adab Journal, 145, 455-470. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v2i145.3962
Alhamam, A.A. (2025). Investigating the role of AI tool interactions in enhancing English language acquisition among Saudi college students. Arab World English Journal, 16(3), 426-440. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no3.26
Ali, O., Abdelbaki, W., Shrestha, A., Elbasi, E., Alryalat, M. A. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). A systematic literature review of artificial intelligence in the healthcare sector: Benefits, challenges, methodologies and functionalities. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(1), Article100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100333
Aljuaid, H. (2024). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools on Academic Writing Instruction in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 26-55. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.2
Alzyudi, M., & Alfugara , S. A. (2024). Modeling morphological structures with artificial intelligence: Derivatives and their meanings in the poem Burdah as an example. Al-Adab Journal, 150, 275-300. https://doi.org/10.31973/kywmgr22
Amirjalili, F., Neysani, M., & Nikbakht, A. (2024). Exploring the boundaries of authorship: A comparative analysis of AI-generated text and human academic writing in English literature. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1347421.https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1347421
An, J., Huang, D., Lin, C., & Tai, M. (2025). Measuring gender and racial biases in large language models: Intersectional evidence from automated resume evaluation. PNAS Nexus, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf089
Bai, H., Voelkel, J. G., Muldowney, S., Eichstaedt, J. C., & Willer, R. (2025). LLM-generated messages can persuade humans on policy issues. Nature Communications, 16(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-61345-5
Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2025). Human-made news vs AI-generated news: A comparison of Portuguese and Spanish journalism students’ evaluations. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 567. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04872-2
Beguš, N. (2024). Experimental narratives: A comparison of human crowdsourced storytelling and AI storytelling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 1392. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03868-8
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press
Colella, S. (2025). “The language of the digital air”: AI-generated literature and the performance of authorship. Humanities, 14(8), Article 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/h14080164
Culda, L. C., Nerişanu, R. A., Cristescu, M. P., Mara, D. A., Bâra, A., & Oprea, S. V. (2025). Comparative linguistic analysis framework of human-written vs. machine-generated text. Connection Science, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2025.2507183
Danesi, M. (2025). AI-generated literature: Whither literary creativity? In P. Hacker (Ed.), Oxford intersections: AI in society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198945215.003.0120
De la Torre-López, J., Ramírez, A., & Romero, J. R. (2023). Artificial intelligence to automate the systematic review of scientific literature. Computing, 105(19), 2171–2194.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-023-01181-x
Durak, H. Y., Eğin, F., & Onan, A. (2025). A comparison of human-written versus AI-generated text in discussions at educational settings: Investigating features for ChatGPT, Gemini and BingAI. European Journal of Education, 60(1), Article e70014. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70014
Elias, S., Alshammari, B. S., Alfraidi, K. N., & Karam, K. M. (2025). Rethinking literary creativity in the digital age: a comparative study of human versus AI playwriting. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, Article 689. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04999-2
Farhan, N. D., Sadiq, B. H., Zwayyer, M. H., & Arnout, B. A. (2024). The impact of using artificial intelligence techniques in improving the quality of educational services/case study at the University of Baghdad. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1474370. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1474370
Gilardi, F., Di Lorenzo, S., Ezzaini, J., Santa, B., Streiff, B., Zurfluh, E., & Hoes, E. (2024). Willingness to read AI-generated news is not driven by their perceived quality. arXiv. .https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03500
Ifelebuegu, A., Kulume, P., & Cherukut, P. (2023). Chatbots and AI in education (AIEd) tools: The good, the bad and the ugly. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.2.29
Ivanytska, N., Koliasa, O., Kovalevska , T., Matsera, O., & Tkachuk, T. (2024). Analyzing the Possibilities of Implementation of AI and Social Networks in Teaching Foreign Language Students: Ukrainian Universities Case Study. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT, 306-318. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/ChatGPT.21
Jakesch, M., Hancock, J. T., & Naaman, M. (2023). Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(11), Article 2208839120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2208839120
Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2020). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., & Tsvetkov, Y. (2019, August). Measuring bias in contextualized word representations. In M. R. Costa-jussà, C. Hardmeier, W. Radford, & K. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the First Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (pp. 166–172). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-3823
Lucy, L., & Bamman, D. (2021, June). Gender and representation bias in GPT-3 generated stories. In N. Akoury, F. Brahman, S. Chaturvedi, E. Clark, M. Iyyer, & L. J. Martin (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Narrative Understanding , 48–55. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.nuse-1.5
Mihna, F. K. H., Habeeb, M. A., Khaleel, Y. L., Ali, Y. H., & Al-saeedi, L. A. E. (2024). Using Information Technology for Comprehensive Analysis and Prediction in Forensic Evidence. Mesopotamian Journal of CyberSecurity, 4(1), 4-16. https://doi.org/10.58496/MJCS/2024/002
Mijwil, M. M., & Shukur, B. S. (2022). A scoping review of machine learning techniques and their utilisation in predicting heart diseases. Ibn Al-Haitham Journal for Pure and Applied Sciences, 35(3), 175–189. https://doi.org/10.30526/35.3.2813
Mohammed, A. M., Mohammed, M., Oleiwi, J. K., Osman, A. F., Adam, T., Betar, B. O., Gopinath, S. C. B., & Ihmedee, F. H. (2025). Enhancing antimicrobial resistance strategies: Leveraging artificial intelligence for improved outcomes. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering, 51, 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2024.12.005
O’Sullivan, J. (2025). Stylometric comparisons of human versus AI-generated creative writing. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), Article 1708. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05986-3
Rettberg, J. W., & Wigers, H. (2025). AI-generated stories favour stability over change: Homogeneity and cultural stereotyping in narratives generated by GPT-4o-mini. Open Research Europe, 5, Article 202. https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20576.1
Saheb, T., Sidaoui, M., & Schmarzo, B. (2024). Convergence of artificial intelligence with social media: A bibliometric & qualitative analysis. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 14, Article 100146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100146
Salinas, A., Haim, A., & Nyarko, J. (2024). What’s in a name? Auditing large language models for race and gender bias. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.14875
Sapuan, W.N.M., Sulaiman, N. A., & Mohamad, M. (2025). The trends in the integration of AI technologies in English language teaching: Systematic literature review. Arab World English Journal, 16(3):259-269. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no3.15
Sardinha, T. B. (2024). AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 4(1), Article100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100083
Schmit, L., & Sonnleitner, P. (2025). Evaluating AI-generated vs. Human-written reading comprehension passages: An expert SWOT analysis and comparative study for an educational large-scale assessment. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 13(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-025-00255-w
Sears, S., & Weisberg, D. S. (2024, November). Bot or not: Can people tell the difference between stories written by a human or by an AI system? [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Diego, CA, United States. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/jkh6p_v3.
Tran, V. H., Sebastian, Y., Karim, A., & Azam, S. (2024). Distinguishing human journalists from artificial storytellers through stylistic fingerprints. Computers, 13(12), Article 328. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers13120328
Tu, S. S., Cyphert, A., & Perl, S. J. (2024). Artificial intelligence: Legal reasoning, legal research and legal writing. Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology, 25(2), 105–142. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjlst/vol25/iss2/11
van Heerden, I., & Bas, A. (2021). AI as author – Bridging the gap between machine learning and literary theory. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 71, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12593
Venkit, P. N., Gautam, S., Panchanadikar, R., Huang, T.-H., & Wilson, S. (2023, May 2–6). Nationality bias in text generation. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 116–122). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Noor Ahmed Khedr is an MA candidate studying English Language and Linguistics at the Department of English, College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad. Her major is Linguistics. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0447-6544
Nawal Fadhil Abbas has a PhD in English Language and Linguistics. She is teaching at the Department of English, College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad. Her research interests include but not limited to Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis, Stylistics, Corpus Linguistics and Applied Linguistics. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-6909