Arab World English Journal (November 2021)                       Theses ID 279                                                    Pp. 1-96
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.279

Full Theses PDF 

Adult Saudi Students’ Practices and Perceptions of Utilizing Twitter for English Language
Learning in the UK

Meshari Muidh Alharthi
King Khalid Military Academy, Riyadh,  Saudi Arabia


 

Author: Meshari Muidh Alharthi
Thesis Title: Adult Saudi Students’ Practices and Perceptions of Utilizing Twitter for English Language Learning in the UK
Institution: School of Arts and Media, The University of Salford, UK
Degree: Master of Arts in Teaching English to Speakers of Other languages and Applied Linguistics
Major: Applied Linguistics  
Year of award:
2016
Supervisor:
Dr. Huw Jarvis
ORCid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9155-2131
Keywords: TESOL, Social media, Saudi students, Twitter, English language learning

Abstract:
Twitter is one of the most widely used social media platforms in Saudi populations; however, research is limited regarding the efficiency, practices, and perceptions of utilizing this platform for the purpose of learning English. This study investigates the ways in which adult Saudi students in the UK use Twitter to learn the English language, and assesses the general practices and perceptions of the social media platform. Employing a sequential explanatory research design by conducting questionnaire and interviews for data collection and analysis, this study reveals that there are several opportunities for English language learning through the use of Twitter. Participants consisted primarily of digital residents who use Twitter to practice and learn English, and many noted that Twitter contributes to refined different language skills and an enhanced vocabulary. Therefore, we strongly recommend that instructors and educators encourage students to use Twitter in an English language learning capacity wherever access is possible.

Cite as: Alharthi, M. M. (2016). Adult Saudi Students’ Practices and Perceptions of Utilizing Twitter for English Language Learning in the UK, School of Arts and Media, The University of Salford, UK (M.A.Thesis). Retrieved from Arab World English Journal (ID Number: 279) Novermber, 2021: 1- 96.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.279

References

  • (2015). Twitter.com site information. Retrieved 5 October, 2015, from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/twitter.com
  • Aspden, E. J., & Thorpe, L. P. (2009). Where do you learn? Tweeting to inform learning space development. Educause Quarterly, 32(1). Retrieved 10 September, 2015, from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/3/where-do-you-learn-tweeting-to-inform-learning-space-development
  • Bax, S. (2003). CALL – Past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.
  • Belshaw, D. (2007). 3 scenarios for using Twitter with your students. Retrieved 19 October, 2015, from http://tinyurl.com/2lvtvf
  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report no. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
  • Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J., & Shen, R. (2009). Microblogging for language learning: Using Twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. In M. Spaniol, Q. Li, R. Klamma, R. W. H. Lau, (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning (pp.78-87). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
  • Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs (1st). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2), 100-107. Retrieved 7 November, 2015, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss2/editorial/article1.cfm
  • Cherney, I. D. (2008). The effects of active learning on students’ memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(2), 152-71.
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Conley, S., Lull, K., & Monsalve, L. (2010). What is social media and what can it do for me? NASN School Nurse, 25(2), 70-71.
  • Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd) Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Cummins, J. (2000). Academic learning, transformative pedagogy, and information technology: Towards a critical balance. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 537-548.
  • De Waal, E., & Schoenbach, K. (2010), News sites’ position in the medias cape: Uses, evaluations and media displacement effects over time, New Media & Society, 12(3), 477-496.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd) (pp. 1-45). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  • Dickens, S. (2008). Twitter – microblogging. Digitalang. Retrieved 5 October, 2015, from http://www.digitalang.com/2008/04/twitter-microblogging
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2009). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Downes, S. (2007). Learning networks in practice. In D. Ley (Ed.), Emerging technologies for learning (vol. 2). Coventry, UK: Becta. Retrieved 24 November, 2015 from http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=en
  • Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction. Needham Heights, MA, Allyn & Bacon.
  • Dudeney, G., Hockly, N., & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital literacies: Research and resources in language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 1-8.
  • Ebner, M., Lienhardt, C., Rohs, M., & Meyer, I. (2010). Microblogs in higher education – a chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? Computers and Education, 55(1), 92-100.
  • (2007). 7 things you should know about Twitter. Retrieved 7 November, 2015, from http://www.educause.edu/ELI/7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutTwitt/161801
  • Faizi, R., El Afia, A., & Chiheb, R. (2014). Social media: An optimal virtual environment for learning foreign languages. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(5), 64-66.
  • Fraij, I. (2015). The state of Saudi Arabia social media. Retrieved 7 November, 2015, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/state-saudi-arabia-social-media-ibrahim
  • Garrett, N. (2009). Computer assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 719-740.
  • Grosseck, G., & Holotescu, C. (2008). Can we use Twitter for educational activities? Paper presented at the 4th International Scientific Conference eLSE: eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania, April 17-18. Retrieved 26 October, 2015, from https://adlunap.ro/else/
  • Hockly, N., & Dudeney, G. (2013). Digital literacies. Harlow, UK: Pearson.
  • Holotescu, C., & Grosseck, G. (2011). Mobile learning through microblogging. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 4‐
  • Huberman, B., Romero D. M., & Wu, F. (2008) Social networks that matter: Twitter under the microscope. Retrieved 30 October, 2015, from http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/scl/papers/twitter/
  • Internet World Stats. (2015). World Internet users and 2014 world population stats. Retrieved from 14 June, 2015,  http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
  • Jarvis, H. (2014). Digital residents: Practices and perceptions of non native speakers. Asian EFL Journal, 75, 21-35.
  • Jarvis, H., & Achilleos, M. (2013). From computer assisted language learning (CALL) to mobile assisted language use. TESL-EJ, 16(4), 1-18. Retrieved 17 August, 2015, from http://tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume16/ej64/ej64a2/
  • Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611.
  • Johnson, D. M. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
  • Johnson, R., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
  • Kelley, S. (2010). Texting, Twitter contributing to students’ poor grammar skills, profs say. The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 5 October, 2015, from http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/texting-twitter-contributing-to-students-poor-grammar-skills-profs-say/article1452300/
  • Kern, R., (2006). Perspectives on technology in learning and teaching languages. TESOL Quarterly 40(1), 183-210.
  • Kolb, D. (2014). David Kolb – University of Leicester. Retrieved 7 November, 2015, from http://infed.org/mobi/david-a-kolb-on-experiential-learning/
  • Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London, UK: Pergamon.
  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lee, H. J., & Rha, I. (2009). Influence of structure and interaction on student achievement and satisfaction in web-based distance learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 372-382.
  • Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 769-782.
  • Livingstone, K. A. (2012). The Importance of feedback and reinforcement in Computer‐Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Baraton Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 2(1), 43‐
  • Lu, L. C., & Yeh, C. L. (2008). Collaborative e-learning using semantic course blog. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 6(3), 1-12.
  • Luo, T., & Gao, F. (2012). Enhancing classroom learning experience by providing structures to microblogging based activities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 11(1), 199-211.
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Mackley, D. (2014) What is a personal learning network/environment? Retrieved 19 August, 2015, from http://blog.yorksj.ac.uk/moodle/2014/05/13/what-is-a-personal-learning-network/
  • Madge, C., Meek, J., Wellens, J., & Hooley, T. (2009). Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 141-155.
  • Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (1990). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Mazer, J. P, Murphy, R. E, & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I’ll see you on ‘Facebook’: The effects of computer-mediated teacher self-disclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate. Communication Education, 56(1), 1-17.
  • Mazer, J. P., Murphy, R. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2009). The effects of teacher self- disclosure via Facebook on teacher credibility. Learning, Media & Technology, 34(2), 175-183.
  • Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2010). Teaching languages online. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
  • Murray, L., & Hourigan, T. (2006). Using micropublishing to facilitate writing in the foreign language. In N. Arnold & L. Ducate (Eds.), Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching (pp. 149-179). San Marcos, TX: CALICO Monograph Series 5.
  • National School Board Association. (2007). Creating and connecting: Research and guidelines on online social—and educational—networking. Retrieved 10 September, 2015, from https://www.nsba.org/sites/default/files/reports/CREATING-CONNECTING-Research-and-Guidelines-on-Online-Social-and-Educational-Networking.pdf
  • Oppenheim, A. (2001). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London, UK: Continuum.
  • Parry, D. (2008). Twitter for academia. AcademHack. Retrieved 5 October, 2015, from http://academhack.outsidethetext.com/home/2008/twitter-for-academia/
  • Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd). London, UK: Sage.
  • (2015). Peerreach: Join the right conversation with the right people. Retrieved 17 November, 2015, from https://peerreach.com
  • Pew Research Centre. (2014). Social networking fact sheet. Retrieved 3 December, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/
  • Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students’ education‐related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 157‐
  • Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning 2(1). Retrieved 1 December, 2015, from http://www.itdl.org/journal/jan_05/article01.htm
  • Statistic Brain. (2015). Twitter statistics. Retrieved 13 November, 2015, from http://www.statisticbrain.com/twitter-statistics/
  • Tess, P. A. (2013). The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(5), A60-A68. Retrieved 17 October, 2015, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032
  • Trifanova, A., Knapp, J., Ronchetti, M., & Gamper, J. (2004). Mobile ELDIT: Challenges in the transitions from an e-learning to an m-learning system. Trento, Italy: University of Trento. Retrieved 20 November, 2015, from http://eprints.biblio.unitn.it/532/1/paper4911.pdf
  • Tsai, P. J., Hwang, G. J., Tseng, C. R., & Hwang, G. H. (2008). A computer assisted approach to conducting cooperative learning process. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 6(1), 49-66.
  • (2015). Twitter reports third quarter 2015 results. Retrieved 3 November, 2015, from https://investor.twitterinc.com/results.cfm
  • Utecht, J. (2008). How to create a personal learning network. Tech & learning28(10), 52.
  • Veletsianos, G. (2011). Designing opportunities for transformation with emerging technologies. Educational Technology, 51(2), 41.
  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2013). Scholars and faculty members’ lived experiences in online social networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 43-50.
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1985). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
  • Wheeler, S. (2009). Teaching with Twitter: Learning with ‘e’s. Retrieved 5 October, 2015, from http://steve-wheeler.blogspot.fr/2009/01/teaching-with-twitter.html
  • White, D., & Cornu, A. (2011). Visitors and residents: A new typology for online engagement. First Monday, 16(9). Retrieved 24 November, 2015, from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/3171/3049
  • Yang, Y. F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181-198.
  • Young, M. M. (2010) Twitter me: Using micro-blogging to motivate teenagers to exercise. In Winter, J. L. Zhao & S. Aier (Eds.) Global perspectives on design science research (pp. 439-448). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.279
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Meshari Alharthi is an academic staff at King Khalid Military Academy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia and a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Tasmania in Australia. He received a bachelor’s degree in the English language with a minor degree in Education from Taif University in Saudi Arabia and an MA in TESOL and Applied Linguistics from the University of Salford in the UK. He is interested in language learning and social media platforms. https://orcid.org/0000-0001- 9155-2131