Views: 989
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Vol. 17. No.12. July 2026 Pp.288-304
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Department of English Education, Jeonbuk National University, South Korea
The rapid advancement of Generative Artificial Intelligence technologies has transformed various fields, including education, yet research on students’ acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools in Malaysia remains limited. Therefore, this study investigates the adoption of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools among undergraduate students at a public university in Malaysia using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework. The findings provide insights for educators, administrators, and policymakers in fostering a technology-enhanced learning environment in Malaysia. A quantitative survey design was employed, and data were collected from 51 undergraduate students through an online questionnaire. Descriptive statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS to examine students’ perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools. The validity and reliability of the instrument were verified. Findings revealed a strong overall acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence tools. Performance Expectancy plays a significant role, with students perceiving it as effective for improving productivity, and quality of their work. Effort Expectancy contributes to adoption, as students find it easy to integrate into their studies. While Social Influence had a less decisive impact, peer recommendations encouraged adoption despite limited instructor support. Facilitating Conditions supported the adoption through access to necessary resources, although structured training remained insufficient. High Behavioural Intention and Use Behaviour scores indicate that Generative Artificial Intelligence tools have become an essential component of students’ learning processes.
Jia, B., Mohamad, M.,Kamsin,I. F., & Shim, J. (2026). Generative Artificial Intelligence-Powered Learning: A UTAUT Study among Undergraduate Students from a Public University in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL 17. (12)288-304.
Alexander, K. et al. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting AI-generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English with Technology, 23(2), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.56297/BUKA4060/XHLD5365
Alhalangy, A., & AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the impact of AI on the EFL context: A case study of Saudi universities.
Alhalangy, A., & AbdAlgane, M. (2023). Exploring the Impact of AI on the EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Universities. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 23(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v23i2.125
Alharbi, K., & Khalil, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in ESL vocabulary learning: An exploratory study on students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Migration Letters, 20(S12), 1030-1045.
Ali, A. M. (2023). An Intervention Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in the ESL Classroom: English teacher perspectives on the Effectiveness of ChatGPT for Personalized Language Learning. Master of Arts in Upper Secondary Education, 300.
Al-kumaim, N. H. et al. (2025). Navigating GenAI in Malaysian universities: Use, problems, and challenges. In 2025 5th International Conference on Emerging Smart Technologies and Applications (eSmarTA) (pp. 1–7). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/eSmarTA66764.2025.11132252
Alotumi, M. (2022). Factors influencing graduate students’ behavioral intention to use Google Classroom: Case study-mixed methods research. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 10035–10063. htpps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11051-2
An, X. et al. (2023). Modeling English teachers’ behavioral intention to use artificial intelligence in middle schools. Education and Information Technologies, 28(5), 5187-5208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11286-z
Au, W. C. (2023). Examining the adoption of ChatGPT technology among academics in higher education institutions in Malaysia (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Malaysia. http://eprints.utar.edu.my/6221/
Barzanji, A. M., & Alsofyani, A. H. (2026). Exploring Saudi EFL learners’ motivation and perceptions of ChatGPT and instructor feedback in paragraph writing. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, (3), 5–25. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI3.1
Baltezarević, R., & Baltezarević, I. (2024). Students’ attitudes on the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in personalized learning. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 12(2), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-2-387-397
Borhan, N. R. et al. (2026). Utilization of Generative AI Tools in Assignment Completion Among DCS and DCV Students. Tropical Scientific Journal, 5(1), 79-91.
Bui, H. Q. et al. (2025). AI adoption: A new perspective from accounting students in Vietnam. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 32(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-06-2024-0300
Corbett, A. T. et al. (1997). Intelligent tutoring systems. In M. G. Helander, T. K. Landauer, & P. V. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 849–870). Elsevier.
Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
Dahri, N. A. et al. (2024). Extended TAM based acceptance of AI-Powered ChatGPT for supporting metacognitive self-regulated learning in education: A mixed-methods study. Heliyon, 10(8), e29317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29317
Dahri, N. A. et al. (2024). Investigating AI-based academic support acceptance and its impact on students’ performance in Malaysian and Pakistani higher education institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12599-x
Han, J. et al. (2024). Continue using or gathering dust? A mixed method research on the factors influencing the continuous use intention for an AI-powered adaptive learning system for rural middle school students. Heliyon, 10(12), e33251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33251
Helmiatin, H. A., & Kahar, M. R. (2024). Investigating the adoption of AI in higher education: a study of public universities in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2380175. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2380175
Hsiao, J. C., & Chang, J. S. (2023). Enhancing EFL reading and writing through AI-powered tools: design, implementation, and evaluation of an online course. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2207187
Hsu, L. (2023). EFL learners’ self-determination and acceptance of LMOOCs: The UTAUT model. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(7), 1177-1205. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1976210
Jin, Y. et al. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Joshi, A. et al. (2015). Likert scale. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7, 396. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Julien, G. (2024). How Artificial Intelligence (AI) Impacts Inclusive Education. Educational Research and Reviews, 19(6), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2024.4404
Kamoun, F. et al. (2024). Exploring students’ and faculty’s knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions towards ChatGPT: A cross-sectional empirical study. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 23, 1–22. . https://doi.org/10.28945/5239
Kang, H. (2022). Effects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Native Speaker Interlocutors on ESL Learners’ Speaking Ability and Affective Aspects. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.15702/MALL.2022.25.2.09
Kumar, J. A., & Bervell, B. (2019). Google Classroom for mobile learning in higher education: Modelling the initial perceptions of students. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 1793–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-09858-z
Lee, A. H. C. (2025). Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence among Selected Pre-University Business Students at a Private University in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Futures in Education and Society, 4(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.58946/apjfes-4.1.P1
Lin, H. C. et al. (2022). Understanding adoption of artificial intelligence-enabled language e-learning system: An empirical study of the UTAUT model. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(1), 74-94. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.119966
Majid, I., & Yanduri, V. L. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in Education. The Indian Journal of Technical Education, 45(3), 11-16. https://ssrn.com/abstract=4463555
Malik, N., & Dahiya, M. (2024). Interacting with ChatGPT: Impact on students and teaching-learning. Sigma Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 42(6), 1736-1748. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00147
Monteiro, F. F. (2021). Análise de uma experiência híbrida no ensino de Física 1. Revista Brasileira de Ensino de Física, 43, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9126-RBEF-2020-0315
Mutia, F. et al. (2024). A comparative analysis of librarians’ views on AI support for learning experiences, lifelong learning, and digital literacy in Malaysia and Indonesia. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202405.1380.v1
Nguyen, H. T., & Chu, Q. P. (2021). Estimating university students’ acceptance of technological tools for studying English through the UTAUT model. International Journal of TESOL & Education, 1(3), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.012
Nuryadin, R., & Marlina, M. (2023). The Use of AI (Artificial Intelligence) in Education-(Literature Review). Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 7(2), 143-158. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v7i2.64290
O’Connor, K. W. (2023). Higher education on cruise control: Is artificial intelligence helping or hurting the classroom? (Order No. 30694645), (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of South Alabama, United States. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/higher-education-on-cruise-control-is-artificial/docview/2887907734/se-2
Shah, P. (2023). AI and the Future of Education: Teaching in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394344000
Shafiee Rad, H. (2024). Revolutionizing L2 speaking proficiency, willingness to communicate, and perceptions through artificial intelligence: a case of Speeko application. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2309539
Shuhidan, S. M. et al. (2019). Extending technology acceptance model to EPV application. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(5), 398–410. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v10n5p398
Smolansky, A. et al. (2023). Educator and student perspectives on the impact of generative AI on assessments in higher education. Educational Studies in Perspective, 27, 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1145/3573051.3596191
Solak, E. (2024). Revolutionizing Language Learning: How ChatGPT and AI Are Changing the Way We Learn Languages. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 353-372. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.732
Sözen, E., & Guven, U. (2024). The effect of online assessments on students’ attitudes towards undergraduate-level geography courses. International Education Studies, 12(10), 1-1. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n10p1
Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size—or why the P value is not enough. Journal of graduate medical education, 4(3), 279-282.
Sun, T. (2023). The Potential Use of Artificial Intelligence in ESL Writing Assessment: A Case Study of IELTS Writing Tasks. Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 7(2), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.22554/ijtel.v7i2.137
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tan, S. C. et al. (2022). A systematic review of artificial intelligence techniques for collaborative learning over the past two decades. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100097
Tian, W. et al. (2024). AI chatbots in Chinese higher education: Adoption, perception, and influence among graduate students—An integrated analysis utilizing UTAUT and ECM models. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1268549
Utina, S. S. et al. (2024). A comparative study of artificial intelligence in education psychology: the cases of Indonesia and Thailand. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 8(1), 70-85.
Venkatesh, V. et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, X., & Reynolds, B. L. (2024). Beyond the Books: Exploring Factors Shaping Chinese English Learners’ Engagement with Large Language Models for Vocabulary Learning. Education Sciences, 14(5), 496. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050496
Woolf, B. P. (2008). Building intelligent interactive tutors: Student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning. Elsevier.
Wu, J. et al. (2026). Modeling the Impact of AI Features on Writing Performance: A TAM–SRL Integrated Framework. Arab World English Journal, Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence, (3):102-117. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/AI3.7
Yusuf, A. et al. (2024). Generative AI and the future of higher education: a threat to academic integrity or reformation? Evidence from multicultural perspectives. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00453-6
Zhang, K., & Saeed, M. A. (2026). Chinese EFL learners’ engagement with ChatGPT feedback on academic writing: A case study in Malaysia. Computers and Composition, 79, 102976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102976
Boxiang Jia was born in China. He is affiliated with the Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. His research areas include Teaching English as a Second Language (TESL) and Technology-Enhanced Learning.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4908-6144
Maslawati Mohamad was born in Malaysia. She is currently a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Her research areas are Teaching English as a Second Language and English for Specific Purposes.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8979-5895
Intan Farahana Kamsin is a senior lecturer at the Faculty of Education, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Her research focuses on the Internet of Things, education among marginalized communities, instructional design, e-learning, and technology for teaching and learning. Her interests include students’ well-being and performance. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0435-6743
Jaewoo Shim is a professor at Jeonbuk National University in South Korea. His research areas include Teaching English to Speakers of Other Language (TESOL), affective variables in language acquisition, and English teacher education.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4760-9354