Views: 3,647
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 11. July 2025 Pp. 342-363
Department of English Language and Literature, College of Science and Humanities,
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
Writing in English is a more conscious and less spontaneous phenomenon than speaking. However, the study examines the errors using a mixed method approach in written English as a foreign language (EFL) of Arabic speakers. Rare studies have investigated the errors committed by Arabic speakers in written English in the context of inflectional morpheme categories. The main aim of the study is to qualitatively analyze the variations in morphological features related to inflectional morphemes and quantitatively assess the associated errors in written English as a foreign language (EFL) made by Arabic speakers.This kind of study is important because it highlights which morphemes are most problematic, and how frequently these errors occur. By doing so, it equips educators with concrete, evidence-based targets for instruction, ultimately enabling them to tailor error correction leading to profeciency. To perform the study, data were collected from 430 undergraduate participants using purposive sampling based on the natural way of writing tasks. The data were analysed by examining the frequency of errors in written English. Additionally, the analyses employed Corder’s (1972) inter-language and intra-language influence error framework and Dulay’s (1982) surface strategy taxonomy. The qualitative analysis highlighted significant morphological differences between Arabic and English in the context of inflectional morphemes. Quantitatively, the results revealed that the most frequent errors occurred with the third-person singular present tense (-s) marker followed in descending order by errors related to the past tense (-ed), plural (-s), progressive (-ing), comparative (-er), superlative (-est), past participle (-en), and possessive (-‘s’) due to interlanguage influence errors in written English. The study underscores the necessity for instructional interventions tailored to address morphological differences, aiming to reduce error rates among Arabic-speaking EFL learners and enhance their proficiency in written English.
Kanwal, A. (2025). Analysis of Errors in Written English EFL Learners: Evidence from Mixed Method. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (11):342-363
Aarts, B., Mcmahon, A. M. S., &Hinrichs, L. (2021).The handbook of english linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Abboud, P. F. (2023). Elementary modern standard arabic, lessons 31-45 : Appendices arabic grammar and vocabulary, part 2.Cambridge University Press.
Abdullah , R., & Hussain, M. (2019). An analysis of undergraduate saudi EFL female students’ errors in written english essays. Arab World English Journal, 1, 241–258. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/efl1.17
Abushihab, I., El-Omari, A. H., &Tobat, M. (2011).An analysis of written grammatical errors of Arab learners of English as a foreign language at Alzaytoonah Private University of Jordan.European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(4), 543-552.
Alahmadi, N. (2019). A study of grammatical errors of subject verb agreement in writing made by Saudi learners.International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 7(6), 48-59.
Al-Issa, A., & Dahan, L. S. (2011).Global English and endangered Arabic in the United Arab Emirates.Global English and Arabic: Issues of language, culture, and identity, 31, 1-22.
Aliyar, M. (2020).A corpus-based analysis of linguistic interference of Italian native speakers in English and Spanish written production as a foreign language.Journal of Second Language Teaching & Research, 8(1), 103-137.
AL-Makatrah, E. S., MohdYasin, M. S., Sulaiman, M. Z., & Al-Khawaldeh, M. I. (2017). The markedness in acquiring do-support in negation and inversion by adult native-arabic speakers learning english. 3L the Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(4), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.17576/3l-2017-2304-11
Alam, S., & Usama, M. (2023). Does e-feedback impact minimizing ESL writing errors? An experimental study.International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 18(04), 156–169. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i04.36349
Alhaj, A. (2016). An introduction to english morphology. A textbook for advanced university students of linguistics.Anchor Academic Publishing.
Aljohani, A. A. (2019). Contrastive analysis: Difficulties arabic learners face in using english language tenses . Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 6(2), 146–156. http://www.jallr.com/index.php/JALLR/article/view/986
Altarawneh, S. M., & H. Hajjo, M. (2018). The acquisition of the english plural morphemes by arabic-speaking EFL learners. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 6(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.2p.34
Assaiqeli, A., Maniam, M., & Farrah, M. (2021). Inversion and word order in english: A functional perspective. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 523–545. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.20217
Atashian, S., & Al-Bahri, K. (2018). Towards arab students’ grammatical errors in academic writing & their perceptions. Arab World English Journal, 1, 140–145. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/mec1.10
BonnefilleS.,&RotgéW. (2011). English linguistics.Presses Universitaires Du Mirail, Impr.
Bushi, J., Kristo, E., &Papajorgji, E. (2022). Correction of speaking mistakes when learning a foreign language – analysis of the most common mistakes and their correction in learning the german language. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 12(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2022-0035
Chen, P.-J. (2021). Looking for the right blend: a blended EFL university writing course. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1974052
Corder, S. P. (1967).The Significance of Learner’s Errors.IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1-4). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
Corder, S. P. (1971).Idiosyncratic Dialects and Error Analysis. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1971.9.2.147
Corder, S. P. (1974).Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition.Language Teaching, 8(04), 201. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444800002822
Ellen, M. (2019).ESL, english as a second language : Writing, intermediate & advanced. Research & Education Association.
Ellis, R. (2004). The handbook of applied linguistics (A. Davies & C. Elder, Eds.). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757000
Elshatshat, O., Shebli, Y. I., Aljangaw, M., Fathi, H., &Saleh, Y. (2020). A comparative study on morphology between english and arabic language. Uob.edu.ly. https://repository.uob.edu.ly/handle/123456789/2020
Farooqui, A. (2023). Writing Assignments Difficulties, Factors, and Solutions: ESL Teachers’ Perspectives.
Arab World English Journal, 14 (4): 358-371.DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no4.22
Ferris, D. (2009). Teaching college writing to diverse student populations.University of Michigan Press.
Gewider, R. S. (2023). Libya in the modern orientalist world-system: A critical analysis of english language acquisition (ELA) as a factor in libya‟s new developmental strategy. Brunel.ac.uk. http://bura.brunel.ac.uk/handle/2438/10621
Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (2014).Theory and practice of writing.Routledge.
Hatta, T., Kawakami, A., &Tamaoka, K. (2002). Errors in writing japanese kanji: A comparison of japanese schoolchildren, college students and second-language learners of japanese. Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing, 7(3), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1179/136132802805576427
Holes, C. (2004).Modern arabic : Structures, functions, and varieties. Georgetown University Press.
Hopkyns, S. (2022). Translanguaging in Gulf English-medium instruction higher education. In Language and Identity in the Arab World (pp. 76-92). Routledge.
Hoque, M. A., Alam, M. M., & Ahmed, H. (2020). Nature of errors and mistakes in the English writings of graduating students in Bangladesh: A case study. IIUC Studies, 15, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.3329/iiucs.v15i0.49341
Huddleston, R. D., &Pullum, G. K. (2002).The cambridge grammar of the english language. Cambridge University Press.
James, F. (1998).MINUIT: function minimization and error analysis reference manual (No. CERNLIB-D506).CERN.
Jonsson, E. (2015). Slips or errors? : A study of the grammatical mistakes in swedish pupils’ written production of english. DIVA. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn%3Anbn%3Ase%3Alnu%3Adiva-43855
Jubran, S. M., & Khrais, S. M. (2023). The dilemma of utilising the present perfect tense in english writing by arabenglish learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(5), 1430–1437. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.32
Kanwal, A., & Shehzad, W. (2017). Effective Intervention across Socioeconomic Classes for Improvement in Language Outcomes. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(1), 179-189.
Kanwal, A. (2024). Examining the Effect of Flipped Learning on Proficiency in English Writing Grammar via Inflectional Morphemes. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(4), 1118-1126.
Karim, A., Mohamed, A. R., Ismail, S. A. M. M., Shahed, F. H., Rahman, M. M., &Haque, Md. H. (2018). Error Analysis in EFL Writing Classroom.International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 122. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v8n4p122
Kazazoğlu, S. (2020). The impact of L1 ınterference on foreign language writing: A contrastive error analysis. DilveDilbilimiÇalışmalarıDergisi, 16(3), 1168–1188. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.803621
Khawalda, M. I., & Al-Saidat, E. M. (2012). Structural ambiguity interpretation: a case study of Arab learners of English. Global Journal of human social science, 12(6), 0-6.
Khuwaileh, A. A., & Shoumali, A. A. (2000).Writing Errors: A Study of the Writing Ability of Arab Learners of Academic English and Arabic at University.Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310008666597
Lalande, J. F. (1982). Reducing composition errors: An experiment.The modern language journal, 66(2), 140-149.
Lalitha, N. (2024). The influence of L1 Tamil on the learning of L2 english of std IX students error analysis. Handle.net. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/93108
Leki, I. (2001). Material, educational, and ideological challenges of teaching EFL writing at the turn of the century.International Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 197-209.
Li, Z. (2021). Error analysis – types and causes of errors in english writing among chinese students. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(8), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.26689/jcer.v5i8.2487
Montrul, S. (2011). MORPHOLOGICAL ERRORS IN SPANISH SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS AND HERITAGE SPEAKERS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263110000720
Mudhsh, B. A., Al-Maashani, S., Al-Raimi, M., & Al-Amri, K. (2023). A cross-sectional study of omani EFL students’ competency in using english grammatical aspect categories. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(11), 2755–2762. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1311.04
Muftah, M. (2023). Error analysis in second language acquisition (SLA): Types and frequencies of grammatical errors of simple present and past tense in the elicited written production task of arab EFL undergraduate learners. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 25(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.19202
Neme, A. A., &Laporte, É. (2013). Pattern-and-root inflectional morphology: The arabic broken plural. Language Sciences, 40, 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.06.002
Olson, D. R. (2001).The world on paper : The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge Univ. Press.
Phramphun, T., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2023). The Effects of Self-Regulated Strategy Development on Writing Skill and Self-Regulated Learning of Thai High School Students. Arab World English Journal, 14 (3) 339-350.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no3.21
Poongodi, O. (2024). Error analysis in the use of tense forms among the first year undergraduate students in Erode district. Handle.net. http://hdl.handle.net/10603/263624
Richards, J. C. (2002). Longman language teaching and applied linguistics.Pearson Education.
Ryding, K. C. (2014). Arabic : A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Salomone, R. (2021). RISE OF ENGLISH : Global politics and the power of language. Oxford Univ Press Us.
Sun, X. (2014). Ungrammatical patterns in chinese EFL learners’ free writing. English Language Teaching, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n3p176
Terzioğlu, Y., &BensenBostanci, H. (2020).A Comparative Study of 10th Grade Turkish Cypriot Students’ Writing Errors.SAGE Open, 10(1), 215824402091454. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020914541
Usama, M., Alam, S., Tarai, S., &Banu, S. (2024). The impact of rotation model on minimizing inflectional morphemes errors in english writing: A comparative study of error analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(2), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1402.01
Vennemann, T. (2011). English as a contact language: Typology and comparison. Anglia, 129(3-4), 217–257. https://doi.org/10.1515/angl.2011.084
Versteegh, K. (2001). Linguistic contacts between arabic and other languages. Arabica, 48(4), 470–508. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4057668
Vocroix, L. (2021). Morphology in micro linguistics and macro linguistics.Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 2(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.21744/mami.v2n1.11
Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., &Rodina, Y. (2016).Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
Wright, W., Smith, W. R., &Goeje, M. J. D. (1996).A grammar of the arabic language. At The Univ. Press ; Beirut.
Xanthos, A., & Gillis, S. (2010). Quantifying the development of inflectional diversity.First Language, 30(2), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709359236
Zheng, C., & Park, T.-J. (2013). An Analysis of Errors in English Writing Made by Chinese and Korean University Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(8). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.8.1342-1351
Dr. Afia Kanwal is a distinguished linguist who received her early education in Islamabad, Pakistan and Virginia, USA. Her research interests are diverse, which include socioeconomics of education, child health, school sanitation, second language acquisition, and ELT-related areas.ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6593-6745