Views: 8,379
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence 2025 Pp.348 -357
National Defence University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
The growing reliance on artificial intelligence in education has ignited discussions among students, faculty, and policymakers, particularly regarding its role in academic writing. With the rise of AI-powered tools like ChatGPT, undergraduates are navigating new ways to enhance their learning experience. While some perceive ChatGPT as a valuable assistant for enhancing learning experience, there is a noticeable scarcity of data on critical thinking among students, especially in the context of AI-assisted learning. This paper conducts a systematic literature review to examine undergraduate perceptions of ChatGPT in academic writing. Using the PRISMA methodology, the review gathers data from Scopus and other relevant databases to analyse how students perceive and utilize AI tools in their academic journey. The findings provide valuable insights for higher education institutions, helping to inform policy development and framework enhancements that balance technological innovation with academic ethics. By establishing clear guidelines on AI usage, universities can ensure that students leverage AI responsibly while maintaining the core values of originality, critical thinking, and academic honesty.
Balraj, B. M. (2025). Exploring the Use of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: A Systematic Literature Review on Undergraduates’ Perceptions. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Artificial Intelligence:348 -357
Abdulhajar, E., Wahyusari, A., Nevrita, N., Irawan, D., Zaitun, Z., Sartika, D., & Hasyim, T. (2024). Students’ Acceptance of ChatGPT Technology: A Study of Its Positive and Negative Impacts on Academic Ethics and Learning Performance. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 205, p. 07003). EDP Sciences
Alqahtani, T., Badreldin, H. A., Alrashed, M., Alshaya, A. I., Alghamdi, S. S., bin Saleh, K., & Albekairy, A. M. (2023). The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19(8), 1236-1242.
AlGhamdi, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT-generated feedback on technical writing skills of computing students: A blinded study. Education and Information Technologies, 1-26.
Anshori,S.,& Fauziah, M. (2024). The Use of ChatGPT in Students’ Writing Task (A Descriptive Study of fifth semester students of English Tadris Study Program at IAIN Curup) (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup, Indonesia).
Baek, C., Tate,T & Warschauer,M.(2024). “ChatGPT seems too good to be true”: College students’ use and perceptions of generative AI, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence,Volume 7,100294, ISSN 2666-920X
Bahroun, Z., Anane, C., Ahmed, V., & Zacca, A. (2023). Transforming education: A comprehensive review of generative artificial intelligence in educational settings through bibliometric and content analysis. Sustainability, 15(17), 12983.
Chia, C. S., Phan, J., Harry, O., & Lee, K. M. (2024). Graduate students’ perception and use of ChatGPT as a learning tool to develop writing skills. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 6(3), 113-127
Dans, E. (2023). ChatGPT and the Decline of Critical Thinking. Innovation and Technology.
Dwivedi, Y. K. et al. (2023). Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R. & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students’ perceptions towards ChatGPT:An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70-88.
Fadillah, M. A., Usmeldi, U., Lufri, L., Mawardi, M., & Festiyed, F. (2024). Exploring user perceptions: The impact of ChatGPT on high school students’ physics understanding and learning. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(2), 1197-1207.
Gruda, D. (2024). Three ways ChatGPT helps me in my academic writing. Nature, 10.
Gammoh, L. A. (2024). ChatGPT in academia: Exploring university students’ risks, misuses, and challenges in Jordan. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 48(6), 608-624.
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876-4883.
Heaven, W. D. (2023). ChatGPT is everywhere. Here’s where it came from. MIT Technology Review, 10.
Imad, A. (2024). The use of ChatGPT in written assignments of the EFL students Case study of master one students at the department of English at University of Mohamed Khider Biskra (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Biskra University, Algeria.
Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Fidalgo, P. (2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4), e202346
Janković, A., & Kulić, D. (2025). Use And Misuse of ChatGPT in Academic Writing Among the English Language Students. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 105(1), 178-188. doi:https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v105i1.5955
Kennelly, I., & Donnelly, R. (2023). AI Supporting Student Academic Writing in Higher Education.Teaching Resources, National College of Ireland, Dublin.
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 1-36.
Kohnke, L. (2024). Exploring EAP students’ perceptions of GenAI and traditional grammar-checking tools for language learning. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100279
Kasneci, E. et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and individual differences, 103, 102274.
Launonen, P., Talalakina, E., & Dubova, G. (2024). Students’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT for Academic Writing in English: Insights from a Finnish University. Tertium Linguistic Journal, 9(1), 219-249.
Laredj, H., & Mebarek, F. N. E. (2024). Investigating the dynamic interaction between human language and artificial intelligence tools: AI writing assistants as a case study (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation) Ibn Khaldoun University-Tiaret, Algeria
Li, J., Zong, H., Wu, E., Wu, R., Peng, Z., Zhao, J., & Shen, B. (2024). Exploring the potential of artificial intelligence to enhance the writing of English academic papers by non-native English-speaking medical students-the educational application of ChatGPT. BMC Medical Education, 24(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05738-y
Liang, W., & Wu, Y. (2024). Exploring the use of ChatGPT to foster EFL learners’ critical thinking skills from a post-humanist perspective. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 54, 101645.
Liu, L., Zhang, T., & Xie, X. (2023). Negative life events and procrastination among adolescents: The roles of negative emotions and rumination, as well as the potential gender differences. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 176. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020176
Liu, Y., Park, J., & McMinn, S. (2024). Using generative artificial intelligence/ChatGPT for academic communication: Students’ perspectives. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 1437-1461.
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the liter-ature. Educ. Sci., 13, 410.
Liao, Z. et al. (2024). LLMs as Research Tools: A Large-Scale Survey of Researchers’ Usage and Perceptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05025.
Mahapatra, S. Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: a mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learn. Environ. 11, 9 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Malik,M. A, Amjad, A.I, Aslam, S. & Fakhrou, A.( 2024) Global insights: ChatGPT’s influence on academic and research writing, creativity, and plagiarism policies. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics. Vol (9). https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1486832
Naimi, A., Yaqot, E., & Aissa, H. (2024). ChatGPT as an Essential Tool: Student Perceptions in Academic Writing at Chlef University. Journal of Studies in Language, Culture and Society (JSLCS), 7(2), 98-114. https://asjp.cerist.dz/en/article/255736
Nouara, M., & Dehbia, M. (2023). Students’ Attitudes towards and Teachers’ Perceptions of the Utilization of ChatGPT to Improve Students’ Writing Proficiency (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation) Mouloud Mammeri University, Algeria.
Pavlenko, O. & Syzenko, A. (2024). Using ChatGPT as a Learning Tool: A Study of Ukrainian Students’ Perceptions (May 2, 2024). Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on ChatGPT. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4814736
Roumeliotis, K. I., & Tselikas, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and open-ai models: A preliminary review. Future Internet, 15(6), 192.
Rasul, T. et al. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41-56.
Rane, N. L., Choudhary, S. P., Tawde, A., & Rane, J. (2023). ChatGPT is not capable of serving as an author: Ethical concerns and challenges of large language models in education. International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, 5(10), 851-874.
Rhee, J. U., Kim, H. R., & Shin, H. W. (2023). A Study on College Students’ Perceptions of ChatGPT. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 35(4), 1-12.
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Shuhaiber,A., Kuhail,M.A. & Salman,S. (2025). ChatGPT in higher education – A Student’s perspective, Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 17, 2025,100565, ISSN 2451-9588
Sun, G. H., & Hoelscher, S. H. (2023). The ChatGPT storm and what faculty can do. Nurse Educator, 48(3), 119-124.
Sardi, J., Candra, O., Yuliana, D. F., Yanto, D. T. P., & Eliza, F. (2025). How Generative AI Influences Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Critical Thinking Skills? A Systematic Review. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 15(1).
Stadler,M., Bannert, M, & Sailer,M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160,108386, ISSN 0747-563
Sormunen, E. (2000). A method for measuring wide range performance of Boolean queries in full-text databases. Tampere University Press.
Šehanović, S., Džambegović, E., Stančić, S., & Luka, T. B. (2023). The (mis) use of Openai’s ChatGPT as a Novel Communication Tool in Higher Education and the Imperative for a Paradigm Shift in Student Assessment. Proceedings on Quality, 305-310.
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai,A., & Fabio,R. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, ISSN 0959-4752, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011.
Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843.
Thong, C. L., Butson, R., & Lim, W. (2023). Understanding the impact of ChatGPT in education: Exploratory study on students’ attitudes, perception and ethics. ASCILITE Publications, 234
Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270
Valova, I., Mladenova, T., & Kanev, G. (2024). Students’ Perception of ChatGPT Usage in Education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 15(1).
van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. M. J., & Sutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100342
Wang, L., & Ren, B. (2024). Enhancing Academic Writing in a Linguistics Course with Generative AI: An Empirical Study in a Higher Education Institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329
Yu, H. (2023). Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1181712.
Zebua, J. A. Z., & Katemba, C. V. (2024). Students’ Perceptions of Using the OpenAI ChatGPT Application in Improving Writing Skills. Journal of Language and Literature Studies, 4(1), 110–123.
Dr. Belinda Marie Balraj is a senior lecturer at the Language Centre, National Defence University of Malaysia
where she teaches Academic Writing, Sociolinguistics and Communication studies.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0846-1691