Teacher Autonomy, Creative Self-efficacy, and Innovative Behavior: Perspectives from Chinese University EFL Teachers

References:

Azari Noughabi, M., & Amirian, S. M. R. (2020). Assessing the contribution of

autonomy and self-efficacy to EFL teachers’ self-regulation. English Teaching & Learning, 45(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-020-00060-4

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

Benson, P. (2010). Teacher education and teacher autonomy: Creating spaces for experimentation in secondary school English language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 14(3), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810365236

Borasi, R., & Finnigan, K. (2010). Entrepreneurial attitudes and behaviors that can help prepare successful change-agents in education. The New Educator, 6(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688x.2010.10399586

Buske, R. (2018). The principal as a key actor in promoting teachers’ innovativeness – analyzing the innovativeness of teaching staff with variance-based partial least square modeling. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 29(2), 262–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2018.1427606

Cai, Y., & Tang, R. (2021). School support for teacher innovation: Mediating effects of teacher self-efficacy and moderating effects of trust. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100854

Cai, Y., & Tang, R. (2022). School support for teacher innovation: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101096

Chirkov, V., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.97

Choi, W.-S., Kang, S.-W., & Choi, S. B. (2021). Innovative behavior in the workplace: an empirical study of moderated mediation model of self-efficacy, perceived organizational support, and leader–member exchange. Behavioral Sciences, 11(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs11120182

Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: integrating theory and practice. The Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.2307/258093

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14

Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: the state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108

Dikilitaş, K., & Mumford, S. E. (2019). Teacher autonomy development through reading teacher research: agency, motivation and identity. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1442471

Erss, M., Kalmus, V., & Autio, T. H. (2016). “Walking a fine line”: teachers’ perception of curricular autonomy in Estonia, Finland and Germany. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 48(5), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2016.1167960

Evans, B. K., & Fischer, D. G. (1992). A hierarchical model of participatory decision-making, job autonomy, and perceived control. Human Relations, 45(11), 1169–1189. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679204501103

Fang, Y., Lei, Y., & Song, Z. (2019). Influence of inclusive human resource management practice on employees’ innovative behaviors: The mediating effect based on self-efficacy of innovation. Science Research Management, 40(12), 312–322.

Farmer, S. M., & Tierney, P. (2017). Considering creative self-efficacy: its current state and ideas for future inquiry. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (eds.), The Creative Self-Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 23-47). Academic Press.

Gao, X. (2018). Language teacher autonomy and social censure. In Chik, A., Aoki, N., Smith, R. (eds.), Autonomy In Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 29-49). Palgrave Pivot.

Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education, Cop.

Han, J., Gao, C., & Yang, J. (2021). Chinese university EFL teachers’ perceived support, innovation, and teaching satisfaction in online teaching environments: the mediation of teaching efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.761106

Hsiao, H.-C., Chang, J.-C., Tu, Y.-L., & Chen, S.-C. (2011). The Impact of Self-efficacy on Innovative Work Behavior for Teachers. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.6

Janssen, O. (2003). Innovative behavior and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317903769647210

Klaeijsen, A., Vermeulen, M., & Martens, R. (2017). Teachers’ innovative behavior: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 62(5), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803

Liu, S., Lu, J., & Yin, H. (2022). Can professional learning communities promote teacher innovation? A multilevel moderated mediation analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103571

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.98.2.224

Mausethagen, S., & Mølstad, C. E. (2015). Shifts in curriculum control: contesting ideas of teacher autonomy. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2015(2), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.3402/nstep.v1.28520

Michael, L. A. H., Hou, S.-T., & Fan, H.-L. (2011). Creative Self-Efficacy and Innovative Behavior in a Service Setting: Optimism as a Moderator. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45(4), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01430.x

Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413

Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103463

Nur Hidayah, & Rodhiah Rodhiah. (2024). The Influence of Entrepreneurial Leadership, Self-Efficacy on Innovative Work Behavior of SMEs in Tangerang. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 7(3), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v7i3.1993

OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 insights and interpretations. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/talis/TALIS2018_insights_and_interpretations.pdf /. Accessed May 20, 2020

Orakci, Ş., & Durnali, M. (2022). The mediating effects of metacognition and creative thinking on the relationship between teachers’ autonomy support and teachers’ self‐efficacy. Psychology in the Schools, 60, 162–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22770

Orakcı, Ş., Yüreğilli Göksu, D., & Karagöz, S. (2023). A mixed methods study of the teachers’ self-efficacy views and their ability to improve self-efficacy beliefs during teaching. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035829

Ozdemir, T. Y., & Cakalci, N. (2022). How school climate affects teachers’ individual innovativeness: the mediating role of teacher autonomy. Educational Process International Journal, 11(4), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.114.4

Ozkal, N. (2014). Relationships between teachers’ creativity fostering behaviors and their self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Research and Reviews, 9, 724–733. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2014.1816

Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580–607. https://doi.org/10.5465/256701

So, K. (2013). Knowledge construction among teachers within a community based on inquiry as stance. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.10.005

Syerina Syahrin, & Akmal, N. (2024). Navigating the Artificial Intelligence Frontier: Perceptions of Instructors, Students, and Administrative Staff on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education in the Sultanate of Oman. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/chatgpt.4

Teng, Y., Pu, R., & Hao, Y. (2024). How can an innovative teaching force be developed? The empowering role of distributed leadership. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 51, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101464

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative Self-Efficacy: Its Potential Antecedents and Relationship to Creative Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1137–1148. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069429

Uppathampracha, R., & Liu, G. (2022). Leading for innovation: self-efficacy and work engagement as sequential mediation relating ethical leadership and innovative work behavior. Behavioral Sciences, 12(8), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12080266

Vermeulen, M., Kreijns, K., & Evers, A. T. (2020). Transformational leadership, leader–member exchange and school learning climate: Impact on teachers’ innovative behavior in the Netherlands. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(3), 491–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220932582

Xu, H., Guo, P., & Bao, L. (2021). Influence of organizational innovation support on innovative behavior of researchers: chain intermediary effect of creative self-efficacy and knowledge sharing. Science and Technology Management Research, 8, 124–131.

Yang, S. C., & Huang, Y.-F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers’ behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085–1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.03.009

Yuan, Y., Liu, B., Liu, P., Marie, C., & Liu, Y. (2023). Why and when innovation performance is available: the role of fell responsibility for constructive change and creative self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 43(11), 10132–10147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05073-3

Zhang, M., & Zhang, X. (2012). Teachers’ innovative work behavior and innovation culture. Chinese Journal of Ergonomics, 18(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012213

Zhu, J., Yao, J., & Wu, M. (2018). Extrinsic autonomy of teaching and job satisfaction: mediating role of intrinsic autonomy of teaching. Psychological Development and Education, 34(3), 338–345.