Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020 Pp102 -113
Writing for Journal Publications: A Case Study of Eight Computer Scientists in Algeria
Department of Letters and English Language, University of Ouargla
Department of English, ENS of Laghouat, Laghouat, Algeria
Department of English, ENS of Laghouat, Laghouat, Algeria
Chaker Abdelaziz Kerrache
3Department of Mathematics and Computer Science,
University of Ghardaia, Ghardaia, Algeria
Journal publications written in English are a sina qua non condition for national and international recognition. Recent literature in applied linguistics and other fields has denounced the existence of some conventions and “rules” that govern a given research writing. That is, using a concise, clear and error-free language is demanded in order to increase accessibility and ease of understanding. With the aid of textual descriptive analysis, this paper attempts to review the most common linguistic reasons behind papers’ rejection. Eight papers of Ph.D. computer science students were collected and analyzed qualitatively in order to diagnose the main problems and challenges Ph.D. students face while writing for scholarly publication. Other than other linguistic lacunes, it is found out that the authors had problems mainly with using the right tone, choosing the correct words and the adequate tense use. Indeed, the results of this study are supposed to be of some use to writers who want to know what writing conventions, if there are any, are adequate for paper publication. Finally, some recommendations related to students’ problems in writing for scholarly publication are made.
Keywords: Scientific writing, linguistic conventions, journal publication, revisions
Cite as: Cheriguene, A.,Tayeb, K.,& Kerrache, C.A.(2020). Writing for Journal Publications: A Case Study of Eight Computer Scientists in Algeria. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6). Pp102 – 113.
Ammon, U. (Ed.). (2011). The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities ( 84). Walter de Gruyter
Cho, D. (2009). Science Journal Paper Writing in an EFL Context: The Case of Korea. English for Specific Purposes, 28(4), 30-239.
Cuschieri, S., Grech, V., & Savona-Ventura, C. (2018). WASP: (Write a Scientific Paper): Structuring a scientific paper. Early Human, 128, 117.Development. doi:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2018.09.011
Clemen, G. (1997). The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. Research In Text Theory, 235-248.
Dede H, & Sabarti A. (2019).Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Ability through Blended learning-Based Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). (14)20, 2019
Fahy, K. (2008). Writing for publication: Argument and evidence. Women and Birth Journal, 21(3),113-117
Ferguson, G., Pérez‐Llantada, C., &Plo, R. (2011). English as an international language of scientific publication: A study of attitudes. World Englishes, 30(1), 41-59.
Fuentes, A. (2009). A Case Study Corpus for Academic English Writing by NNS Authors. In A survey of corpus-based research [Recurso electrónico], Murcia (Spain) (pp. 7-9).
Godman, A & E.M.F.Payne. (1981). A taxonomic approach to the lexis of science. In L. Selinker,
- Tarone,E and V. Hanzeli (eds.) English for Academic and Technical Purposes: Studies in honor of Louis Trimble, Rowley.Newbury House Publishers.
Hamel, R. (2007). The dominance of English in the international scientific periodical literature and the future of language use in science.AILA Review, 20(1), 53-71.
Hanauer, D. I., Sheridan, C. L., & Englander, K. (2018). Linguistic Injustice in the Writing of Research Articles in English as a Second Language: Data From Taiwanese and Mexican Researchers.Written Communication, 36 (1), 136–154.
Hasanuddin, D., Emzir, E., & Akhadiah, S. (2019). Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Ability through Blended learning-Based Collaborative Learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 14(20), 34-43.
Hinkel, E. (2003). Adverbial markers and tone in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 35,1049–1068
Hyland, K. (1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in Science Research Articles. Applied Linguistics, 17(4), 433-454.
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge.TEXT, 18(3), 349- 382.
Jafarpur, A. (1996): Native speaker performance validity: In vain or for gain?,System, 24, 83-95.
Kaplan, R. B. (2001). English–the accidental language of science. In U. Ammon (Ed.), The dominance of English as a language of science: Effects on other languages and language communities, 3-26 . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Merga, M., Mason, S. & Morris, J. (2019). ‘The constant rejections hurt’: Skills and personal attributes needed to successfully complete a thesis by publication. Learned Publishing, 32(3), 271-282.doi: 10.1002/leap.1245
Ober, S.( 2008). Contemporary Business Communication. Houghton Mifflin Company. 2009. ISBN-10: 0618990690.
Carrio-Pastor ,M, L., & Mestre-Mestre, E. M. (2013).Lexical errors in second language scientific writing: Some conceptual implications, International Journal Of English Studies,14 (1), 97-108.
Salager-Meyer, F. (2008). Scientific publishing in developing countries: challenges for the future. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7(2), 121-132. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2008.03.009
Slougui,D. (2009). What Scientific Conventions for Scientific Writing. Revue des Sciences Humaines, 31,65-72.
Storch, N. & Tapper, J.(1997). Student annotations: What NNS and NS university students say about their own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing,6, 245-264.
Thonus, T. (2004).What are the differences? Tutor interactions with first- and second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing,13, 227–242.
Truchot C. (2001), Langues et supranationalité en Europe: l’influence linguistique de l’Union européenne. In J. Maurais &M. A. Morris (dir.), Language in a Globalizing World (pp.231-248).Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yen, C. P., & Hung, T. W. (2018).New data on the linguistic diversity of authorship in Philosophy journals.Erkenntnis, 84(4), 953-97.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-9989-4