Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of KUST, Iraq Conference 2022 Pp.100-113
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/KUST.8
Verbalization of the Complex Concept Word/Language/Speech from Dual Linguistics
Perspective
Oleh Tyshchenko
Department of Russian Studies
University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnav
Slovak Republic
Valeriia Smaglii
Philology Department
Odesa National Maritime University, Odesa, Ukraine
Svitlana Yukhymets
Department of Philology
Odesa National Maritime University, Odesa, Ukraine
Corresponding Author: yukhymets.svetlana@gmail.com
Recived: 2/16/2022 Accepted: 5/9/2022 Published: 7/1/2022
Abstract:
The verbalization of the concept WORD / LANGUAGE / SPEECH is a complex phenomenon is viewed from the point of view of a new humanitarian branch – dual linguistics, a combination of scientific and naive interpretation of language in the contemporary English lexicography. Language means verbalizing and explaining such interrelated notions as language, word, and speech, constitutes a mosaic-like unity of nominative units fixed in current lexicographic resources. It is proved that the interpretation of this particular phenomenon in the conceptual and linguistic pictures of the world of an average speaker and professional linguist is radically different. The dual linguistics perspective makes it possible to distinguish the two nominative fields of the studied concept: one for the naive and the other for the scientific pictures of the world. Factual data of the study that has been analyzed were drawn, respectively, on the one hand, from general (explanatory) and, on the other hand, special (linguistic) dictionaries of the English language. The primary task of this research is to describe the nuclear zone of the nominative field of the concept WORD/ LANGUAGE / SPEECH, which presupposes the naïve and scientific understanding of language through the prism of English lexicography.
Keywords: language, linguistics, speech, verbalization, word
Cite as: Tyshchenko, O., Smaglii, V., & Yukhymets, S. (2022). Verbalization of the Complex Concept Word/Language/Speech from Dual Linguistics Perspective. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of KUST, Iraq Conference 2022
(1) 100-113. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/KUST.8
References
Babelyuk, O. (2010). Poetics of postmodern literary discourse: principles of text formation. Kyiv: KNLU.
Babushkyn, A.P. (1996). Tipy kontseptov v leksyko-frazeolohycheskoi semantyke yazyka. [Types of Concepts in Lexico-Phraseological Semantics of a Language]. Voronezh: Yzd-vo Voronezh.
Babushkyn, A.P. (2001). Kontsepty raznykh tipov v leksyke i frazeolohyy i metodyka ykh vyiavlenyia. [The Concepts of Different Types in Lexicology and Phraseology and Methodology of their Revealing]. Metodolohycheskye problemy kohnytyvnoi lynhvystyky. Voronezh, 52–58.
Briscoe, T. (2003). Grammatical assimilation.In M. H. Christiansen & S. Kirby (eds.), Language evolution (pp. 295-316). Oxford University Press.
Carstairs-McCarthy, A. (1999). The origins of complex language. An inquiry into the evolutionary beginning of sentences, syllables and truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1980). On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. Language and Learning. In M. Piatteli, (ed.), The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 36-52). Palmarinni: Harvard University Press.
Chomsky, N. (2010). O pryrode y yazyke. [On nature in a language]. Moskva: KombyKnyha.
Corballis, M. C. (2003). From hand to mouth: The gestural origins of language. In Language Evolution (pp. 201–218). Oxford University Press.
Crow, T.J. (2000). Did Homo Sapiens special on the Y chromosome? Psychology, 1–18.
Daniel, H. (1989). The vestibular system and language acquisition. Studies in language origins, 1, 257–271.
Davidson, I. (2003). The archaeology of language origins: states of art. In M. Christiansen and S. Kirby (eds) Language evolution: states of the art. (pp. 140-157). Oxford University Press.
Enfield, N.J., & Levinson, S.C. (2006). (Eds.). Roots of human sociality: Cognition, Culture and Interaction. Routledge.
Evans, N., & Levinson, St. ( 2009). The Myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 429-492. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x0999094x
Evans, V. (2009). How words mean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Evans, V., Bergen, B., Zinken, B. (2007). The cognitive linguistics enterprise: an overview. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader. London: Equinox. P. 263-266. https://2c9c9846-1aab-4969-b684-caf9150983e
Hurford, James. (2003). The Language Mosaic and Its Evolution. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244843.003.0003.
Ivanov, V. V. (1978). Chet y nechet: Asymmetryia mozgha y znakovykh system. [Even and Odd. Assymetry of the Brain in Sign Systems]. Moskva: Sov. radyo.
Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kirby, S. & Christiansen, M.H. (2003). From language learning to language evolution. In Christiansen, M. and Kirby, S., editors, Language Evolution, (pp. 272–294). Oxford University Press.
Koliasa O.V. (2015). Adhocratychne poetychne myslenny yak cognitivno-semantychnyi mehanism tvorennia igrovogo absurdu v postmodernistskomu fantasijnomu opovidanni. In Molodyi Vchenyi, 2, p. 383-387 [Ad-hoc poetic thinking as cognitive-senantic mechanism of ludic absurd’s creation in postmodern fantasy story].
Koliasa, O.V. (2016). Mehanizmy tvorennia igrovoho absurdu v postmodernistskomu literaturnomu teksti. In Naukovyi visnyk Drohobytskogo universitetu. Philologichni nsauky. Movoznavstvo, р. 107-115 [Mechanisms of ludic absurd’s creation in postmodern literary text].
Kubriakova, E.S. (1995). Evoliutsyia lynhvystycheskykh ydei vo vtoroi polovyne XX veka. Yazyk y nauka kontsa 20 veka. [Evolution of Linguistic Ideas in the Second Part of the XX century. Language and the Science of Contrast]. Moskva: Yn-t yazykoznanyia RAN.
Laland, K.N. et al. (2000). Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 131–175.
Levinson, S.C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explanations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613609
Levinson, S.C., & Jaisson, P. (2006). Evolution and Culture: A Fyssen Foundation Symposium. MIT Press.
Mechkovskaia, N.B. (2004). Semyotyka. Yazyk. Pryroda. Kultura. [Semiotics. Language. Culture. Nature. Culture]. Moskva: Akademyia.
Mechkovskaia, N.B. (2018). Phylosofyia yazyka y kommunykatsyy. [Philosophy of the language and communication]. Moskva: FLYNTA: Nauka. 520 s.
Saussure, F. (1977). Trudy po yazykoznanyiu. [Works on Linguistics]. Moskva: Prohress.
Smagliy, V. (2018). Types of communicative activities and communication for the information exchange as lingvo-cognitive aspect of the SPEECH concept. Science and Education a New Dimension. Philology, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.31174/SEND-Ph2018-182V153-11
Smagliy, V. (2020). Thematic group communicative actions and processes as a component of the WORD/LANGUAGE/SPEECH concept in English idioms. The Scientific Heritage, 3(54), 59–66.
Spoor, F., Wood, B., & Zonneveld, F. (1994). Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal locomotion. Nature, 645–648.
Tyshchenko, O. (2018). Movna kontseptualizatsiya semantychnoho protystavlennya pustyy/povnyy/empty-full: zistavna rekonstruktsiya v korpusakh tekstiv ta paremiyakh. [Language conceptualization of semantic dichotomy empty/full: contrastive reconstruction in text corpus and paremias]. Studia Slawistyczne: Etnolingwistyka i komunikacja międzykulturowa, Lublin, 189–213.
Wilkins, W.K. & Wakefield, J. (1995). Brain evolution and neurolinguistic preconditions. Behavioral and brain sciences, 18, 161–226.