Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on the English Language in Ukrainian Context, November 2020 Pp184-193
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt3.16
Utilizing the Neurolinguistic Programming Technologies in Foreign languages Teaching Practice in
Ukrainian Universities
Tetiana Kovalevska
Ukrainian Language Department
Philology Faculty, Odesa National I. I. Mechnikov University
Odesa, Ukraine
Anastasia Kovalevska
Ukrainian and Foreign Languages Department
Management and Business Technologies Faculty, Odesa Regional Institute for Public Administration
of the National Academy for Public Administration under the President of Ukraine
Odesa, Ukraine
Abstract:
The research paper considers the main provisions of the new scientific direction of Neurolinguistic Programming (NLP); its fundamental goal is determined, which first of all includes optimizing the interactive interaction in practically all discursive genres of modern communicative space; the effectiveness of utilizing several NLP techniques in the Ukrainian educational segment is substantiated, first of all – in the process of teaching foreign languages, in particular English, given its international status and scientific potential. The main aim of the study is to review the relevant NLP techniques aimed at optimizing the teacher’s professional skills, and hence the effectiveness of the learning process as a whole. Such techniques include predicate, meta- and Milton-model personal identification, as well as spelling. The significance of the study is determined by the fact that this set of neurolinguistic techniques will be extremely useful both in creating comfortable communicative learning conditions as the basis of its effectiveness and inactivating the students’ psychocognitive abilities and increasing their professional competence level. The main question of the research paper is how to generally contribute to educational process optimization, mainly, in teaching foreign languages in the Ukrainian-speaking environment. In the study, both general scientific research tools (descriptive method, analysis, synthesis, observation) and special experimental methods (recording and comparing the results of applied NLP techniques, surveys, evaluations) are utilized. The main findings of the research allowed to determine the students’ individual neurophysiological mechanisms (representative priorities) in the process of educational data perception; to identify cases of the students’ deviant behavior through the reconstruction of their verbal and nonverbal behavior and adjust the communicative background to create a comfortable learning environment; to apply the elements of correct suggestibility to strengthen the students’ cognitive activity, and the naturalization of teaching data; to enhance the processes of memorization, effective assimilation and competent reproduction of new data through the directed activation of representative systems (visual, audible, kinesthetic) and the corresponding submodalities.
Keywords: Neurolinguistic Programming, teaching foreign languages, predicate identification technique, Metamodel and Milton-model identification technique, spelling technique, learning efficiency, Ukrainian universities
Cite as: Tetiana Kovalevska, T. , & Kovalevska, A. (2020). Utilizing the Neurolinguistic Programming Technologies in Foreign languages Teaching Practice in Ukrainian Universities. Arab World English Journal: Special Issue on English in Ukrainian Context. 184-193 .
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/elt3.16
References
Akkuzu, N. (2014). The role of different types of feedback in the reciprocal interaction of teaching performance and self-efficacy belief. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 37- 66.
Alder, H. (2000). NLP: sovremennye psihotehnologii [NLP: modern psychotechnology]. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
Alder, G. & Heather, B. (2000). NLP. Polnoe prakticheskoe rukovodstvo [NLP. Complete practical guide]. Кyiv: Sofija.
Bakirov, A. (2020). NLP-tekhnologiyi. Razghovornyi gipnoz [NLP technologies. Conversational hypnosis]. Moscow: Fors.
Bandler, R. & Grinder, D.(1996). Struktura magii [The structure of magic]. Saint Petersburg: Belyj krolik.
Bandler, R. & Roberti, A. & Fitzpatrick, O. (2014) How to Take Charge of Your Life: The Users Guide to NLP. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Butova, A. V. Dubskikh, A. I. & Sevast’yanova, V. S. (2014). Listening with Pleasure: teaching aid. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekh. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova.
Jacobs, S. C. (2010). Nejromenedzhment [Neurological management.]. Кyiv: Companion Group.
Dilts, R. (2000). Modelirovanie s pomoshh’ju NLP [Modeling using NLP]. Saint Petersburg.: Piter.
Dimukhametov, F.S. (2006). Fasilitacija v sisteme povyshenija kvalifikacii pedagogov: diss. na soiskanie stepeni d-ra ped. nauk: [Facilitation in the system of professional development of teachers: diss. … Dr. ped. sciences.]. Magnitogorsk: Izd-vo Magnitogorsk. gos. tekh. un-ta im. G.I. Nosova.
Kovalev, S.V. (1999). Osnovy nejrolingvisticheskogo programmirovanija [Fundamentals of neurolinguistic programming]. Мoscow : Flinta.
Kutuza, N. V. (2018). Komunikatyvna sugestiya v reklamnomu dyskursi: psyholingvistychnyj aspekt [Communicative suggestions in advertising discourse: psycholinguistic aspect]. Кyiv: Vydavnychyy Dim Dmytra Buraho.
Lozanov, G. (1971). Sugestologija [Sugestology]. Sofia: София: Nauka i izkustvo.
Matsumoto, D. (2002). Psihologija i kul’tura [Psychology and culture]. Saint Petersburg: EVROZNAK.
Nejrolingvisticheskoe programmirovanie [Neuro-linguistic programming]. Available at http:// www.fido7.com/cgi-fido7/fagserv/psytech2?name=ralflect&part7
O’Connor, J. & Seymour, J. (1997). Vvedenie v NLP [Introduction to NLP]. Chelyabinsk : Versija.
Ostrander, S. & Schroeder, L. & Ostrander, N. (2000). Superobuchenie 2000.= Superlearning [Superlearning 2000. = Superlearning]. Minsk: Popurri.
Pavlova, M. A. (2000). Intensivnyiy kurs povyisheniya gramotnosti s pomoschyu NLP. Uchebnoe posobie [Intensive NLP Literacy Course. Tutorial]. Moscow: Izd-vo Instituta Psihoterapii.
Pligin, A. A. (2000). Mnozhestvennoe opisanie, pozvoljajushhee podkljuchit’ resursy anti-arhetipa 4-oj pozicii vosprijatija [Multiple description, allowing to connect the resources of the anti-archetype of the 4th position of perception]. Vestnyk NLP. Sovremennaya praktycheskaya psyhologiya, 2, 116-123.
Rogers, C. R. (1975). Empatic: an unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5 (2), 2-10.
Selivanova, O. O. (2010). Lingvisty`chna ency`klopediya [Language encyclopedia]. Poltava: Dovkillya.
Solodka, A. K. (2016). Teoretyko-metodychni zasady kroskulturnoyi vzayemodiyi uchasnykiv pedagogichnogo procesu vyshhyh navchalnyh zakladiv: dys. … d-ra ped. nauk [Theoretical and methodical ambush of the cross-cultural interaction of the participants in the pedagogical process of the higher education establishments: dis. … Dr. ped. Sciences]. К.: Shidnoukr. nacz. un-t im. Volodymyra Dalya.
Solodka, A., & Perea, L. (2018). The Speech Act of Complimenting as Part of the Ukrainian, Russian and English-Speaking Communities: Ukraine and the USA. Arab World English Journal, 9 (4), 39-55. Available at https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.3
Sternin, I. A. (2001). Vvedenie v rechevoe vozdejstvie [Introduction to speech impact]. Voronezh: Kvarta.
Tatur, Y. G. (2004). Kompetentnost’ v strukture modeli kachestva podgotovki specialista [Competence in the structure of the quality model of specialist training]. Vysshee obrazovany`e segodnya, 3, 20 – 28.