Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020 Pp. 191- 211
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.13
Using Blended Learning to Support the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language
Hebah Asaad Hamza Sheerah
English Department, Faculty of Language and Translation
Abha, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia
Abstract:
The recent development in the field of technology in education has led to renewed interest in blending traditional methods of teaching with technology which might enhance language teaching and learning. The purpose of this paper is to review the literature concerning the strengths and weaknesses of blended learning as a technology-enhanced pedagogical tool that combines online and face-to-face instructional activities, on the development of English skills, inclusive of its use in the teaching of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Furthermore, this article sheds new light on how blended learning allows the learner to become autonomous and engaged in the construction the knowledge, rather than acting as passive absorbers. It is expected that this paper will contribute to enhancing the body of knowledge that exists in the area of blended learning, especially as it applies to the issue of the acquisition of experience in English as a foreign language. It can be concluded that the use of blended learning has the potential to support EFL learning and maximize EFL learners’ opportunities to practice the English language freely at their convenience. There are issues which need to be addressed and, or resolved, such as ensuring that the library facilities are capable of delivering this type of approach, online materials are suitably supportive of the students needed to access them, and the design of blended learning approaches take account of the preferred learning methods of students, and the workload required to be successful.
Keywords: blended learning, distance education, English as a Foreign Language (EFL), face-to-face learning, flexibility, self-directed learners, technology-enhanced learning
Cite as: Sheerah, H. A. H. (2020). Using Blended Learning to Support the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6).191- 211. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.13
References
Al-Alwani, A. (2014). Information technology integration in higher education: A novel approach for impact assessment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(6), 32–36.
Alaidarous, K., & Madini, A. (2016). Exploring EFL students’ perceptions in a blended learning environment in Saudi technical education context. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 3(6), 69–81.
Akkakoson, S. (2013). The Relationship between Strategic Reading Instruction, Student Learning of L2-based Reading Strategies, and L2 Reading Achievement. Journal of Research in Reading, 36(4), 422–450. Retrieved from http://10.0.4.87/jrir.12004
Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2011). Blended learning in Saudi universities: challenges and perspectives. Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 49–59. DOI: 10.1080/09687761003657614
Alkubaidi, M. (2014). The relationship between Saudi English major university students’ writing performance and their learning style and strategy use. English Language Teaching, 7(4), 84–95.
Albiladi, W. S., & Alshareef, K. K. (2019). Blended Learning in English Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Current Literature. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 10(2), 232–238. DOI: 10.17507/jltr.1002.03
Ahmed, W. K., & Zaneldin, E. (2013). E-Learning as a stimulation methodology to undergraduate engineering students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 8(3), 4–7. Retrieved from http://10.0.15.151/ijet.v8i3.2550
Alshehri, A. (2017). Student satisfaction and commitment towards a blended learning finance course: A new evidence from using the investment model. Research in International Business and Finance, 41(1), 423–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.050
Al Zumor, A. W. Q., Al Refaai, I. K., Bader Eddin, E. A., & Aziz Al-Rahman, F. H. (2013). EFL students’ perceptions of a blended learning environment: advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95–110.
Alshathri, S. (2016). The challenges of developing blended learning in the first electronic university in the Arab world (Saudi Electronic University). E-Journal of the British Education Studies Association, 7(3), 86–98.
Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205–234.
Banditvilai, C. (2016). Enhancing students ’language skills through blended learning. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 14(3), 220–229. DOI:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05240.x/full [12.
Badawi, M. (2009). Using blended learning for enhancing EFL prospective teachers’ pedagogical knowledge and performance. Paper presented at Learning & Language— The Spirit of the Age. Cairo, Egypt, Match 14-15, 2009.
Bhat, P. Rajashekar, B., & Kamath, U. (2007). Perspectives on Self-Directed Learning: The Importance of Attitudes and Skills. Bioscience Education E-Journal, 10(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.3108/beej.10.c3
Bax, S. (2003). CALL—past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.
Bralic, A., & Divjak, B. (2018). Integrating MOOCs in traditionally taught courses: achieving learning outcomes with blended learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(2), 1–16.
Casey, D. M. (2008a). A journey to legitimacy: The historical development of distance
education through technology. TechTrends, 52(2), 45–51. DOI: 10.1007/s11528-008-0135-z
Cobanoglu, A. A., Yucel, Z. E., Uzunboylar, O., & Ceylan, B. (2017). A blended mentoring practice for designing e-material for English as a foreign language learning. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 141–160.
Collis, B., & Moonen, J. (2002). Flexible learning in a digital world. Open Learning: The journal of open and distance learning, 17(13), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051022000048228
Cobanoglu, A. A., Yucel, Z. E., Uzunboylar, O., & Ceylan, B. (2017). A blended mentoring practice for designing e-material for English as a foreign language learning. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 141–160.
Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., and Moskal, P. (2004). Blended learning. Educause Center for Applied Research, Research Bulletin, Retrieved from http://www.net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0407.pdf
Daniel, W. (2015). The Open University: A history. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Englund, C., Olofsson, A. D., & Price, L. (2017). Teaching with technology in higher education: understanding conceptual change and development in practice. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1171300
Edwards-Groves, C. (2012). Interactive creative technologies: Changing learning practices and pedagogies in the writing classroom. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 35(1), 99-113.
Ellis, R., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments—Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102(1), 90–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.07.006
Entwistle, N. (2000). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: the influences of teaching and assessment. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. XV, pp. 156–218). New York: Agathon.
Elango, R., Gudep, V. K., & Selvam, M. (2008). Quality of e-learning: An analysis based on e-learners’ perception of e-learning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 6(1), 31–42.
Ellis, R., Pardo, A., & Han, F. (2016). Quality in blended learning environments—Significant differences in how students approach learning collaborations. Computers & Education, 102(1), 90–102.
Forsman, L. (2010). EFL education in the new millennium: Focus on the promotion of awareness of difference and diversity. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 54(5), 501–517. DOI: 10.1080/00313831.2010.508926
Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5) 365–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20302
Greenberg, G. (1998). Distance education technologies: best practices for K–12 settings. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 17(4), 36–40.
Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 1-17.
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 95–105.
Gruszczynska, A., Merchant, G., & Pountney, R. (2013). “Digital futures in teacher education”: Exploring open approaches towards digital literacy. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 11(3), 193–206.
Gordon, N. (2014). Flexible pedagogies: technology-enhanced learning. York, UK: The Higher Education Academy.
Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 1(1), 6–21.
Garnham, C., Kaleta, R. J., & Sudzina, M. (2003). Preparing for and teaching hybrid courses [PowerPoint slides]. Retrieved from https://library.educause.edu/resources/ 2003/1/preparing-for-and-teaching-hybrid-courses
Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The past, present and future of blended learning: An in-depth analysis of literature. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(1), 4596–4603.
Gorard, S., & Taylor, C. (2004). Combining methods in educational and social research. London: McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Gruszczynska, A., Merchant, G., & Pountney, R. (2013). “Digital futures in teacher education”: Exploring open approaches towards digital literacy. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 11(3), 193–206.
Hamdan, N. A., Mohamad, M., & Shaharuddin, S. (2017). Hypermedia reading materials: Undergraduate perceptions and features affecting their reading comprehension. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 15(2), 116–125.
Hamad, M. M. (2017). Pros & cons of using Blackboard collaborate for blended learning on students’ learning outcomes. Higher Education Studies, 7(2), 7–16. DOI:10.5539/hes.v7n2p7
Harb, J., & Krish, P. (2020). Cognitive Presence in a Blended Learning Environment at Jordanian Universities. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 44–51. DOI: 10.24093/awej/vol11no1.4
Hoskins, B. (2013). The changing face of distance education. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 61(3), 189–190.
Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 72(1), 97–101. DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccx058
Horowitz, H. (1988). Campus life: Understanding cultures from the end of the eighteenth century to the present (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Ja’ashan, H. (2015). Perceptions and attitudes towards blended learning for English courses: a case study of students at university of Bisha. English Language Teaching, 8(9), 40– 50. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v8n9p40
Ja’ashan, M. M. N. H. (2020). The Challenges and Prospects of Using E-learning among EFL Students in Bisha University. Arab World English Journal, 11(1), 124–137. DOI 10.24093/awej/vol11no1.11
Keisling, B. (2018). Blended learning. Scaling library services and instruction to support changing educational landscapes. Library Management, 39(3/4), 207–215.
Knight, J. (2014). Is internationalisation of higher education having an identity crisis? In J. Forest & P. Altbach (Eds.), The forefront of international higher education (Vol. 42, pp. 75–87). Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands.
Keegan, D. (2013). Foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7), 1–20 Retrieved from https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4.
Khoshaim, H. B. (2017). High school graduates’ readiness for tertiary education in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Instruction, 10(3), 179–194.
Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36. DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2013.770404
Littlejohn, A., & Pegler, C. (2007). Preparing for blended e-learning. New York: Routledge.
Little, D. (1991). Learner Autonomy, 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin, Ireland: Authentic.
Lazaroiu, G., Popescu, G. H., & Nica, E. (2016, July). Democratizing education: the potential of EdX in revolutionizing learning. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (Vol. 3, p. 34). Washington: National Defence University.
Levy, D. (2017). Online, blended and technology-enhanced learning: Tools to facilitate community college student success in the digitally driven workplace. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 10(4), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.19030/cier.v10i4.10039
Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research, 1(1), 17–48.
Mihai, F., & Purmensky, K. L. (2016). Course design for TESOL: A guide to integrating curriculum and teaching. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
Mugenyi, J. K., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness. The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(7), 1-20. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2Fs41239-017-0043- 4.pdf
Marton, F., & Saljo, R. (2005). Approaches to learning. In D. Hounsell (Ed.), The experience of learning: Implications for teaching and studying in higher education (3rd ed., pp. 39–58). Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
Masters, K., Ellaway, R. H., Topps, D., Archibald, D., & Hogue, R. J. (2016). Mobile technologies in medical education: AMEE Guide No. 105. Medical Teacher, 38(6), 537–549. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2016.1141190
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Mohammed, A. I. (2018). Blended Learning in English Language Teaching Contexts. Dirasat: Educational Sciences, 45(3), 389–403. DOI: 10.5539/elt.
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “blended Learning” be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–26.
Olson, J. (2001). Distance learning and the transformation of higher education. The Reference Librarian, 35(74), 221–232. DOI: 10.1300/J120v35n74_14
Poon, J. (2013). Blended learning: an institutional approach for enhancing students’ learning experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–289.
Prewitt, T. (1998). The development of distance learning delivery systems. Higher Education in Europe, 23(2), 187–194.
Panchabakesan, S. (2011). Problems and prospective in distance education in India in the 21st century. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 30, 113–122.
Randeree, K. (2006). Active learning strategies in engineering education in Gulf countries. International Journal of Learning, 12(11), 1–8.
Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Researching student learning: Approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Rivers, B. A., Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2014). Promoting reflection in asynchronous virtual learning spaces: Tertiary distance tutors conceptions. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(3), 215–231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v15i3.1777
Ricci, C., & Pritscher, C. (2015). Holistic Pedagogy: The self and quality willed learning. New York: Springer.
Suda, K., Sterling, J., Guirguis, A., & Mathur, S. (2014). Student perception and academic performance after implementation of a blended learning approach to a drug information and literature evaluation course. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 6(3), 367–372.
Sitthitikul, P. (2011). Exploring metacognitive reading strategies and their effects on academic learning: Case studies of ESL students in higher education in the US. HRD Journal, 2(2), 81–97.
Sockett, G. (2014). The online informal learning of English. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Stein, J., & Graham, C. (2015). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. London: Routledge.
Sadik, A. (2016). Factors affecting the acceptability of online degrees: Evidence from two Arab countries. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(12), 54–63. Retrieved from http://10.0.15.151/ijet.v11i12.6022
Sauve, L. (1993). What’s behind the development of a course on the concept of distance education? In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 99– 109). New York: Routledge.
Sriarunrasmee, J., Techataweewan, W., & Mebusaya, R. P. (2015). Blended learning supporting self-directed learning and communication skills of Srinakharinwirot University’s first year students. Procedia–Social and Behavioural Sciences, 197, 1564–1569.
Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. ASTD. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development State of the Industry Report. Retrieved from http://www.leerbeleving.nl/wbts/wbt2014/blend-ce.pdf
Stein, J., & Graham, C. (2015). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide. New York: Routledge.
Sitthitikul, P. (2011). Exploring metacognitive reading strategies and their effects on academic learning: Case studies of ESL students in higher education in the US. HRD Journal, 2(2), 81–97.
Terry, L., & Reinders, H. (2008). Learner and teacher autonomy: Concepts, realities, and responses. London: John Benjamins Publishing.
Toffoli, D., & Sockett, G. (2015). University teachers’ perceptions of online informal learning of English (OILE). Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 7–21. DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2013.776970
Trinder, R. (2017). Informal and deliberate learning with new technologies. ELT Journal, 71(4), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccw117 Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/eltj/article/71/4/401/3038073
Thai, N., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2017). The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education: Looking for the best “blend” of lectures and guiding questions with feedback. Computers & Education, 107(1), 113–126.
Thang, S. M., Wong, F. F., Noor, N. M., Mustaffa, R., Mahmud, N., & Ismail, K. (2012). Using a blended approach to teach English for academic purposes: Malaysian students’ perceptions of redesigned course materials. International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning, 7(2), 142–153. DOI: 10.5172/ijpl.2012.7.2.142
Voigt, K.-I., Buliga, O., & Michl, K. (2017). Democracy in education: The case of edX. In Business Model Pioneers (pp. 159–170). London: Springer.
Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38(1), 127–135. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.018
Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81–94.
Weaver, D., Spratt, C., and Nair, C. (2008). Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 30–41. DOI: 10.1002/pits.20302
Warschauer, M. (2000). The death of cyberspace and the rebirth of CALL. English Teachers’ Journal, 53(1), 61–67.
Willis, B. (1994). Distance education: strategies and tools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational technology Publications.
Yalçınkaya, D. (2015). Why is blended learning for vocationally oriented language teaching?. Procedia–Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174(1), 1061–1068. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.795
Yang, Y. (2012). Blended learning for college students with English reading difficulties. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(5), 393-410.
Zacharis, N. Z. (2015). A multivariate approach to predicting student outcomes in web-enabled blended learning courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 27(1), 44–53.