Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number1.  March 2022                                        Pp.161-172
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.11

 Full Paper PDF    

Use of Discourse Markers among Senior University Students  

Ali Alsaawi
College of Humanities & Sciences in Alghat, Majmaah University
Majmaah, Saudi Arabia
Email: a.alsaawi@mu.edu.sa

Received: 10/4/2021              Accepted:2/14/2022                   Published:3/24//2022

Abstract:
The study of discourse markers has attracted the attention of researchers as a facet of linguistics since the 19^th century. The focus of research has been based on the theoretical status of discourse markers in relation to how they are used and for what reasons, explored in different contexts and settings; however, few studies have been conducted in the context of Saudi Arabia. This study, therefore, attempted to look at the use of discourse markers by senior university students majoring in English in Saudi Arabia and its functions. Fraser’s (2004) semantic perspective, classifying discourse markers into four categories, was adopted, together with Hiilker’s (1991) features of discourse markers, consistent with the view that the meaning of discourse markers is related to their function of clarifying the intrinsic value of an utterance. The results revealed that students in their essays employed discourse markers in all four of Fraser’s (2004) categories. However, it was evident that the participating students struggled with the appropriate use of discourse markers. This issue should be examined in greater depth and the reasons for this difficulty assessed. One reason lies in students’ low exposure to discourse markers in class. It is thus highly recommended that teachers raise EFL students’ awareness of discourse markers by providing them with more related tasks and exercises.
Keywords: combining discourse markers, discourse markers, EFL learners, university students, written discourse

Cite as: Alsaawi, A.  (2022). Use of Discourse Markers among Senior University Students   Arab World English Journal,
13 (1) 161-172.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no1.11

References

Ab Manan, N. A., & Raslee, N. N. (2016). The use of discourse markers in paragraph writing

among Malaysian ESL learners. Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Perak, 7(3)22-30.

Alahmed, S., Mohammed, Y., & Kırmızı, Ö. (2020). The use of discourse markers in L2 English

writing by Iraqi postgraduate students at Karabuk University. Eurasian Journal of English
Language and Literature, 2(1), 107-115.

Al-Hazmi, S. (2006). Writing reflection: Perceptions of Arab EFL learners. South Asian

Language Review, 16(2), 36-52.

Ali, E.A. M. & Mahadin, R. S. (2016). The use of discourse markers in written discourse by

students of English at the University of Jordan. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science
, 6(3), 23-35.

Al-Jamhoor, Aw. (2001). A cross-cultural analysis of written discourse of Arabic-speaking

learners of English. Journal of King Saud University (Language and Translation), 13(1), 25-44.

Al-Khuweileh, A., & Al-Shoumali, A. (2000). Writing errors: A study of the writing ability of

Arab learners of academic English and Arabic at university. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 13(2), 174-183.

Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (1995). The role of temporal segmentation markers in discourse

processing. Discourse Processes, 19(3), 385-406.

Bestgen, Y., & Vonk, W. (2000). Temporal adverbials as segmentation markers in discourse

comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 74-87.

Blakemore, D. (1987). Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.

Bolden, G. B. (2009). Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker “so” in English

conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 974-998.

Brinton, L. (1996). Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions.

Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Buysse, L. (2012). So as a multifunctional discourse marker in native and learner speech.

Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1764-1782.

Crossley, S., & McNamara, D. (2010). Cohesion, coherence, and expert evaluations of writing

proficiency. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 32(32), 984-989.

Cuenca, M. J. (2003). Two ways to reformulate: A contrastive analysis of reformulation markers.

Journal of Pragmatics, 35(7), 1069-1093.

Deveci, T. (2019). Sentence length in education research articles: A comparison between

Anglophone and Turkish authors. The Linguistics Journal, 14(1), 73-100.

El-Sadig, E. (2010). Arab EFL learners’ writing dilemma at tertiary level. English Language

Teaching, 3(4), 33-39.

Fareh, S. (2014). Macrolinguistic errors in Arab EFL learners’ essays. Procedia-Social and

Behavioral Sciences, 141, 923-933.

Fareh, S., Jarad, N., & Yagi, S. (2020). How well can Arab EFL learners adequately use

discourse markers? International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 20(2), 85-98.

Faghih Sabet, A., Khodabandehlou, M., & Jahandar, S. (2013). The impact of instructing

discourse markers (cohesive devices) on Iranian EFL learner’s reading comprehension ability.
Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences, 3(3), 273-280.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(1), 931-952.

Fraser, B. (2004). An account of discourse markers. In Garcés, P., R. Gómez, L. Fernández, &

1. Padilla. (Eds.). Current trends in intercultural, cognitive and social pragmatics (pp. 13-34).
   Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.

Fraser, B. (2013). Combinations of contrastive discourse markers in English. International

Review of Pragmatics, 5(2), 318-340.

Fraser, B. (2015). The combining of discourse markers –A beginning. Journal of Pragmatics, 86,

48-53.

Halliday, M.A.K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hiilker, K. (1991). Franziisisch: Partikelforschung. Lexikon der Romanistischen Linguistik, V(1),

77-88.

Iseni, A, Almasaeid, A. A., & Bani Younes, M. A. (2016). The role of discourse markers and

cohesive devices in writing: EFL students a case study. Journal of the Association-Institute for
English Language and American Studies, 2(4), 35-48.

McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., McCarthy, P. M., & Graesser, A. C. (2010). Coh-Metrix:

Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 292-330.

Povolná, R. (2012). Causal and contrastive discourse markers in novice academic writing, 38(2),

31-148.

Redeker, G. (1991). Review article: Linguistic markers of discourse structure. Linguistics, 29(6),

1139-1172.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stun, W. (2013). The importance of discourse markers in English learning and teaching. Theory

and Practice in Language Studies, 3(11), 2136-2140.