Arab World English Journal (July 2022) Theses ID 287 Pp. 1-74
The Syntactic Structure of Question Formation of the Saudi EFL Learners
Wejdan Saleh Alqahtani
Author: Wejdan Saleh Alqahtani
Thesis Title: The Syntactic Structure of Question Formation of the Saudi EFL Learners
Institution: English Department, Faculty of Languages and Translation, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia
Major: Applied Linguistics
Year of award: 2022
Supervisor: Prof. Ali Alamir
ORCid ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0199-3759
Keywords: Canonical tag question, misformation alternating forms, intensive curruculum, unqualified teachers
English Question Formation in the Saudi context has received very little attention. To the best of our knowledge, there are two studies conducted in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA): one looked at the difficulties Saudi students faced when constructing English questions with specific regard to wh and yes/no questions, and the primary problems associated with their difficulties (Al-Hassaani, 2016). Another study analyzed the errors Saudi EFL learners made when forming wh questions and the reasons behind making them (Addaibani, 2017). Therefore, this current study is seen as the first study that aims to analyze Saudi students’ errors in constructing tag questions (canonical tag questions), wh questions, and yes/ no questions at King Khalid University (KKU). It found out the reasons behind making such errors and the difficulties that they faced when forming these English question types. For achieving this study’s aims, a mixed-method research approach was employed, and data were collected from grammatical tests and interviews (open-ended interviews). Saudi students’ errors were examined by using the grammatical test in which they were required to generate wh, yes/no, and canonical tag questions. Further, to examine Saudi students’ difficulties and causes of making errors, the researcher conducted open-ended interviews. After reaching out to the findings of this study, it showed disagreement with similar previous studies. First, the most difficult English type in terms of formation was wh questions, including the highest number of errors in the “Wrong Wh Question Word” category. Then tag questions (canonical tag questions) came to be in the second rank of difficulty, and “Mis-formation Alternating Forms” was the highest category of errors. Lastly, yes/no questions were the easiest ones for Saudi EFL learners, and the common type was the “Wrong Auxiliary” category. This current study has also revealed that some of the students’ errors were due to lack of practice and community as affected reasons, and intensive curriculum and unqualified teachers as less affected reasons.
Cite as: Alqahtani, W. S. (2022). The Syntactic Structure of Question Formation of the Saudi EFL Learners. English Department, Faculty of Languages and Translation, King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia (M.A.Thesis). Retrieved from Arab World English Journal (ID Number: 287) july, 2022:1-74. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/th.287
 Al Mekhlafi, M. (2013). A study of question formation in the English writing of Omani EFL learners. Standard Journal of Education and Essay, 1(4), 57-62.
 Al-Hassaani, A. (2016). A case study of question formations of the Saudi EFL learners at Bisha University. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 54-64.
 Addaibani, A. (2017). Acquisition of Wh-questions in English by Saudi English majors in Najran University. British Journal of English Linguistics, 5(4), 17-28.
 Albanon, R. (2017). Gender and tag-questions in the Iraqi dialect. English Language, Literature & Culture, 2(6), 105-114.
 Avery, T. (n.d.). Tag questions in English. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/7664304/Tag_Questions in_English.
 Byrne, J., & Humble, Á. (2007). An introduction to mixed method research. Atlantic Research Centre for Family-Work Issues, 1, 1-4.
 Murcia, M., & McIntosh, L. (1991). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed).
 Dulay, H., Burt, M., & Krashen, S. (1982). Language two: Oxford University Press. New York.
 Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in Applied Linguistics: Oxford University Press. New York, 748.
 Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University.
 Erlinda, R., & Dewi, S. (2014). Teacher’s questions in EFL classroom. Ta’dib, 17 NO. 2, 177–188.
 Gabrielatos, C. (1997). A question of function: Teacher questions in the EFL classroom. In 18th Annual TESOL Greece Convention, National Bank of Greece Training Centre, Glyfada, Greece (pp. 12-13).
 Hornby, A. (1987). Oxford Advanced Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press.
 Hamiloğlu, K., & Temiz, G. (2012). The impact of teacher questions on student learning in EFL. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the world, 2(2), 1-8.
 Hendriyono, H. (2018). An error analysis in question tag construction based on surface strategy taxonomy at the first semester of the tenth grade of Sma Mathla’Ul Anwar Sindangsari South Lamupng in the academic year of 2017/2018 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
 Hayati, W. (2019). An analysis of written errors; A case of second semester students of English. LET: Linguistics, Literature and English Teaching Journal, 9(1), 77-87.
 Irfaniah, H. (2014). An error analysis in making wh-questions: a case study of the second year students of SMP Islam Al-Syukro Universal.
 Jobeen, A., Kazemian, B., & Shahbaz, M. (2015). The role of error analysis in teaching and learning of second and foreign language. Education and Linguistics Research, 1(2), 52-62.
 Ma, X. (2008). The skills of teacher’s questioning in English classes. International Education Studies, 1(4), 92-100.
 Momani, D. & Altaher, A. (2015). A contrastive analysis of English and Arabic from a syntactical perspective. International Journal of English Literature and Culture, 3(11), 280-284.
 Masruddin, M., & Karmila, K. (2018). Constructing wh-questions through an error analysis at Junior High School of Indonesia. LANGKAWI: Journal of the Association for Arabic and English, 4(2), 123-137.
 Norrish, J. (1983). Language learners and their errors. London: Macmillan Press.
 Nurjanah, N., Anggoro, D., & Dwiastuty, N. (2018). Error analysis of the use of question words in English sentences. Scope: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 80-88.
 Nurafifah, H. (2018). An analysis of students’ errors in making question tags at the first semester of the English grade of MTs N 1 Lampung Selatan in the academic yaar of 2017/2018 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).
 Omari, H. (2018). Analysis of the types of classroom questions which Jordanian English language teachers ask. Modern Applied Science, 12(4), 1-12.
 Octafia, Y., & Adinda, I. (2021). An error analysis of using question tag on students’ writing test of English Department Universitas Pamulang. In the 10th National Online Seminar on Linguistics, Language Teaching and Literature (Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 158-169).
 Pathan, M. (2021). Chief wh-question making errors by the undergraduate level EFL learners: An analysis. International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 9(4), 140.
 Rowland, C. (2006). Explaining errors in children’s questions. Science Direct, 104(2007), 106-134.
 Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2003). Classifying the findings in qualitative studies. Qualitative health research, 13(7), 905-923.
 Samrin, A. (2011). An analysis on the second-year students’ errors in constructing tag questions (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).
 Sabbah, S. (2015). Negative transfer: Arabic language interference to learning English. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on Translation, (4).
 Tottie, G., & Hoffmann, S. (2009). Tag questions in English: The first century. Journal of English Linguistics, 37(2), 130-161.
 Yang, C. (2010). Teacher questions in second language classrooms: An investigation of three case studies. Asian EFL Journal, 12(1), 181-201.
 Zhang, Q. (2010). A study of Chinese learning of English tag questions. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 1(5).