Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 7. July 2021                       Pp.53-69
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.4

Full Paper PDF

             The Presence of Learner Identity in Online Classes in UTAS-Rustaq           

Munira Said Al Siyabi
            Department of English Language and Literature
University of Technology and Applied Sciences-Rustaq, Oman
Correspondent Author: Muniraal-siyabi.rus@cas.edu.om                             

  Dalal Abdullah Al Shekaili
Department of English Language and Literature
University of Technology and Applied Sciences-Rustaq, Oman

 

Received: 5/6/2021     Accepted:  7/3/2021               Published: 7/26/2021

Abstract:
Learner identity has always been a crucial aspect in shaping learners’ learning process. However, the unprecedented and inevitable shift to online learning increases the need to invest in learners’ digital identities. Virtual classes are a new learning context for many Omani students, including the University of Technology and Applied Sciences-Rustaq (UTAS-Rustaq) students, introducing them to new social norms and relatively new assigned roles. Despite students’ current presence in the virtual classes, they are not new to the virtual world; many are already part of social networks. The present study, therefore, aims to investigate learners’ participation in social media and whether such presence would have an impact on their acceptance and involvement in online learning. There is an urge to examine this area which remains unexplored in UTAS-Rustaq due to its past limited practices. A mixed-method approach was implemented to elicit data; the focus group interviews aimed to seek in-depth insights to illuminate the collected data from the survey. The participants were English language learners who have experienced online learning for almost a year. The results indicated a positive presence in the virtual world in contrast to a negative presence in the virtual classroom. Surprisingly, technical difficulties were not the reason for students’ resentment of online learning; on the contrary, students reported that they elevated their technical skills due to the current situation. Rather, negativity arose from a lack of relational connectedness with the new context, which students kept referring to as a temporary situation and lack of teachers’ support.
Keywords: digital identity, learner identity, online learning, social media, teacher support

Cite as:  Al Siyabi, M. S., & Al Shekaili, D. A. (2021). The Presence of Learner Identity in Online Classes in UTAS-Rustaq.
Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (7) 53-69.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.4

References

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning (2nd Edition). Edmonton, AB: AU Press.

Appana, S. (2008). A Review of Benefits and Limitations of Online Learning in the Context of the Student, the Instructor and the Tenured Faculty. International Jl. on E-Learning, 7(1), 5-22.

Babić, S., Krešić, M.,  & Kućel, K. (2014). E-education 2.0: students’ digital identity and online learning activities.37th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO). Opatija, Croatia. May, 2014.

Berlanga, A.J. and Sloep, P.B.: “Towards a Learner Digital Identity”; Proceedings of workshop on Augmenting User Models with Real World Experiences Workshop (AUM), In conjunction with UMAP 201, F. Abel, V. Dimitrova, E. Herder, & G. J. Houben (eds.), July, 15, 2011, Girona, Spain (2011); http://www.wis.ewi.tudelft.nl/aum2011/aum-proceedings.pdf

Blake, N. (2000). Tutors and students without faces or places. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 183–196, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00164.

Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (ed.), MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Learning Youth, Identity, and Digital Media Volume (pp. 1-26). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Boyd, D., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Burbules, N. C. (2002). Like a version: playing with online identities. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 34(4), 387–393.

Cochrane, T., & Antonczak, L. (2015). Developing Students’ Professional Digital Identity. 11th International Conference Mobile Learning, Madeira, Portugal. March, 2015.

Choi, H. J., & Park, J. (2006). Difficulties that a novice online instructor faced: A case study. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7, 317–322.

Coll, C., & Falsafi, L.  (2010) Learner identity. An educational and analytical tool. Revista de Educación, 35(3 ), 211-233

Daves, D. P., & Roberts, J. G. (2010) Online teacher education programs: social connectedness and the learning experience, Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 4, 1-9.

Delahunty, J., Verenikina, I., & Jones, P. (2014). Socio-emotional connections: Identity, belonging and learning in online interactions: A literature review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 23(2), 243-265.

Flad, K. (2010). The influence of social networking participation on student academic performance across gender lines, Counselor Education Master’s Theses. 31.

Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1030&conte xt=edc_theses

Gallick, S. (1998). Technology in higher education: Opportunities and threats. (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED415929).

García-Pastor, M. D. (2018). Learner identity in EFL: An analysis of digital texts of identity in

higher education. Digital Education Review, 33, 55-76.

Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an Analytic Lens for Research in Education. Review of Research in 

            Education, 25, 99-125.

Hughes, G., & Lewis, L. (2003). Who are successful online learners? Exploring the different learner identities produced in virtual learning environments. In J. Cook, & D. McConnell (Eds), Communities of practice. Research Proceedings of the 10th Association for Learning Technology Diversity, identity and belonging in e-learning communities.UK: The University of Sheffield and Sheffield Hallam University.

Ito, M., et al., (2010). Hanging out, messing around, geeking out: Kids living and learning with new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Joyes, G. (2008). Challenging online learner identity through online learning tools. In Hello! Where are you in the landscape of educational technology? Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008. http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/melbourne08/procs/joyes.pdf

Kebritchi, M., Lipschuetz, A., & Santiague, L. (2017). Issues and Challenges for Teaching Successful Online Courses in Higher Education: A Literature Review. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 46(1) 4–29.

Ke, F., Chávez, A., Causarano, P. N., & Causaran, A. 2011. Identity presence and knowledge building: Joint emergence in online learning environments? Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 349-370. DOI 10.1007/s11412-011-9114-z

Lee, J. H., & Kim, H. 2014. An exploratory study on the digital identity formation of Korean university EFL learners. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 13(3), 149-172.

Little, D. (2007). Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 14-29.

Littlejohn, A., Beetham, H., & McGill, L. (2012). Learning at the digital frontier: a review of digital literacies in theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28, 547-556.

Lizenberg, N. (2013). Digital identity and teacher´s role in the 21st century classroom. In Roots & routes in language education: Bi-multi-plurilingualism, interculturality and identity. Selected papers from the 38th FAAPI Conference.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking Risky Opportunities in Youthful Content Creation: Teenagers’ Use of Social Networking Sites for Intimacy, Privacy and Self-Expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393-411.

Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. ITALICS, Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 5(4), 249–267.

MacFarlane, K, (2018). ‘Higher education learner identity for successful student transitions’, Higher Education Research and Development, 37(6), 1201-1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1477742

McLoughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2006). Best Practice in Online Assessment: Principles, Processes and Outcomes. In E. Pearson, & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2006 (pp. 2375-2382). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

Nowland, R., Necka, E.A., & Cacioppo, J.T. (2018). Loneliness and social internet use: Pathways to reconnection in a digital world? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13, 70–87.

Reeves, J. (2009). Teacher Investment in Learner Identity. Faculty Publications: Department of Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.06.003

Rodríguez,J.  Hernández-Serrano, M., & Tabernero, C.  (2020). Digital Identity Levels in Older Learners: A New Focus for Sustainable Lifelong Education and Inclusion. Sustainability, 12, 10657; doi:10.3390/su122410657.

Sarantakos, S. (2013)0 Social Research, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

Selwyn, N. (2012). Social media in higher education. The Europa world of learning.

Shakouri, N. (2012). Constructing Learner Identity: A Poststructuralist Perspective. Language in India, 12(2), 583-594.

Smart, K. L., & Capple, J. J. (2006).  Students’ Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Technology Education, 5, 201- 218.

Smith, G. G., Ferguson, D., & Caris, M. (2002). Teaching over the web versus in the classroom: Differences in the instructor experience. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(1), 61–67.

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2007). A Conceptual Model for Understanding Self-Directed Learning in Online Environments. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(1), 27-42.

Sulcic, V., & Lesjak, D. (2002). Students’ readiness for on-line distance education in Slovenia. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002 (pp. 922-928), Montreal, QB, Canada. Chesapeake.

Vuorela, M., & Nummenmaa, L. (2004). How undergraduate students meet a new learning environment? Computers in Human Behavior, 20,6, 763-777.

Ukwoma, S.C., Iwundu, N.E., & Iwundu, I.E. (2016). Digital literacy skills possessed by students of UNN, implications for effective learning and performance: A study of the MTN Universities Connect Library. New Library World, 117(11/12),702-720. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-08-2016-0061.

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/call7.4    
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Munira Said Al-Siyabi is an assistant lecturer at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Rustaq with nine years of experience of teaching English as a second language. Munira completed her MA in TESOL at Leeds University, UK in 2011. Her research interests include teaching and learning in higher education and learner autonomy.
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0415-5002

Dalal Abdullah Al-Shekaili is a lecturer at the University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Rustaq College of Education. She has nine years of experience in the field of teacher preparation program. Dalal is an MA holder in TESOL from the University of Durham, UK.
ORCID ID:https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9412-9758