Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020                                   Pp.84-101

Full Paper PDF



The Linguistic Characteristics and Functions of Hashtags: #Is it a New Language?

 Iman M. Mahfouz
College of Language and Communication (CLC)
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)
Alexandria, Egypt



Defined as a form of tagging that allows social media users to embed metadata in their posts, hashtags initially served to categorize topics and make them searchable online. Originating first on Twitter in 2007, hashtags have spread to other platforms, such as Instagram, Facebook, and Youtube. In addition to functioning as topic markers, hashtags have developed more complex linguistic functions. The ubiquity of this feature in the online medium, which now occupies a significant portion of our everyday communication is thus worthy of investigation. Although this topic has been researched in different disciplines, such as information diffusion, marketing, as well as sociology and public opinion, hashtags have not yet received enough attention from linguistic research. Using a sample of hashtags from a corpus of Instagram posts by Egyptian and Arab participants, this research thus aims to examine the characteristics of hashtags from a linguistic perspective, with particular focus on hashtags in the Arabic language. The study primarily seeks to determine the morpho-syntactic features of these recently emerging linguistic items according to the taxonomy proposed by Caleffi (2015). It also explores the pragmatic functions of hashtags based on Zappavigna’s (2015) view of hashtags as technologically discursive tools. The analysis points out that most of the hashtags in the data serve the experiential function and come as suffixes. The findings reveal both similarities and differences between English and Arabic hashtags.
Keywords: Arabic language, Callefi’s taxonomy, computer-mediated communication (CMC), hashtags, Instagram, pragmatic functions, social media

Cite as: Mahfouz, I. M.  (2020). The Linguistic Characteristics and Functions of Hashtags: #Is it a New Language? Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6).  84-101.


Baghirov, F., Zhang, Y., Hashim, N., & Murphy, J. (2016). Gender and Instagram hashtags: A study of #Malaysianfood. Retrieved from

Biddle, S. (2011). How the hashtag is ruining the English language. Gizmodo. Retrieved from

Caleffi, P. (2015). The ‘hashtag’: A new word or a new rule? Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics12(2). 46-69. Retrieved from

Evans, A. (2016). Stance and identity in Twitter hashtags. Language @ Internet13(1). Retrieved from

Goodwin, E. (2015, February 26). How hashtags evolved and changed the way we communicate. Uloop College. Retrieved from

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed).  London: Edward Arnold.

Iqbal, M. (2020). Instagram Revenue and Usage Statistics (2020). Retrieved from

Lin, H. (2017). Hashtag on social platforms: how do hashtag change the way we talk? Hsiu-Man Lin. Retrieved from

Maity, S. K., Ghuku, B., Upmanyu, A. & Mukherjee, A. (2015). “Out of vocabulary words decrease, running texts prevail and hashtags coalesce: Twitter as an evolving sociolinguistic system,” 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, pp. 1681-1690, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.212.

Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication 6(2). 181 –201. DOI: 10.1177/1750481312437441

Pasho, J. (2017). #INSERTDIETHERE: Tracing the techno-linguistic associations of dietary hashtags on Instagram. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ottawa: Carlton University. Retrieved from

Scott, K. (2018). “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context and Media22, 57-64.

Shapp, A. (2014). Variation in the use of Twitter hashtags. Retrieved from

Tamara A. S. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society14(6), 872-895. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572

Wikström, P. (2014). #srynotfunny: Communicative functions of hashtags on Twitter. SKY Journal of Linguistics. 27, 127–152.

Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5). 788–806. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810385097

Zappavigna, M., (2015). Searchable talk: the linguistic function of hashtags. Social Semiotics25(3), 274-291. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948

Zimmer, B. (2011, September 23). The art of the self-mocking hashtag. Word routes: Exploring the pathways of our lexicon. Retrieved from


Dr. Iman Mahfouz earned her PhD degree in linguistics from the Faculty of Arts, Alexandria
University. She currently holds the position of associate professor at the College of Language and
Communication (CLC) at the Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport
(AASTMT) in Alexandria. She has published a number of research papers and participated in
conferences in the fields of Computer-mediated discourse (CMD) and Computer-assisted text
analysis (CATA).