Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020 Pp.84-101
The Linguistic Characteristics and Functions of Hashtags: #Is it a New Language?
Iman M. Mahfouz
College of Language and Communication (CLC)
Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT)
Defined as a form of tagging that allows social media users to embed metadata in their posts, hashtags initially served to categorize topics and make them searchable online. Originating first on Twitter in 2007, hashtags have spread to other platforms, such as Instagram, Facebook, and Youtube. In addition to functioning as topic markers, hashtags have developed more complex linguistic functions. The ubiquity of this feature in the online medium, which now occupies a significant portion of our everyday communication is thus worthy of investigation. Although this topic has been researched in different disciplines, such as information diffusion, marketing, as well as sociology and public opinion, hashtags have not yet received enough attention from linguistic research. Using a sample of hashtags from a corpus of Instagram posts by Egyptian and Arab participants, this research thus aims to examine the characteristics of hashtags from a linguistic perspective, with particular focus on hashtags in the Arabic language. The study primarily seeks to determine the morpho-syntactic features of these recently emerging linguistic items according to the taxonomy proposed by Caleffi (2015). It also explores the pragmatic functions of hashtags based on Zappavigna’s (2015) view of hashtags as technologically discursive tools. The analysis points out that most of the hashtags in the data serve the experiential function and come as suffixes. The findings reveal both similarities and differences between English and Arabic hashtags.
Keywords: Arabic language, Callefi’s taxonomy, computer-mediated communication (CMC), hashtags, Instagram, pragmatic functions, social media
Cite as: Mahfouz, I. M. (2020). The Linguistic Characteristics and Functions of Hashtags: #Is it a New Language? Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6). 84-101.
Baghirov, F., Zhang, Y., Hashim, N., & Murphy, J. (2016). Gender and Instagram hashtags: A study of #Malaysianfood. Retrieved from http://agrilife.org/ertr/files/2016/01/ENTER2016_submission_118_.pdf
Biddle, S. (2011). How the hashtag is ruining the English language. Gizmodo. Retrieved from https://gizmodo.com/how-the-hashtag-is-ruining-the-english-language-update-5869538
Caleffi, P. (2015). The ‘hashtag’: A new word or a new rule? Skase Journal of Theoretical Linguistics. 12(2). 46-69. Retrieved from http://www.skase.sk/Volumes/JTL28/pdf_doc/05.pdf
Evans, A. (2016). Stance and identity in Twitter hashtags. Language @ Internet, 13(1). Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2MA3d8N
Goodwin, E. (2015, February 26). How hashtags evolved and changed the way we communicate. Uloop College. Retrieved from shorturl.at/xFHV7
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed). London: Edward Arnold.
Iqbal, M. (2020). Instagram Revenue and Usage Statistics (2020). Retrieved from shorturl.at/eDMTU
Lin, H. (2017). Hashtag on social platforms: how do hashtag change the way we talk? Hsiu-Man Lin. Retrieved from shorturl.at/CKXY5
Maity, S. K., Ghuku, B., Upmanyu, A. & Mukherjee, A. (2015). “Out of vocabulary words decrease, running texts prevail and hashtags coalesce: Twitter as an evolving sociolinguistic system,” 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Koloa, HI, pp. 1681-1690, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2016.212.
Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication 6(2). 181 –201. DOI: 10.1177/1750481312437441
Pasho, J. (2017). #INSERTDIETHERE: Tracing the techno-linguistic associations of dietary hashtags on Instagram. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ottawa: Carlton University. Retrieved from shorturl.at/rEKV0
Scott, K. (2018). “Hashtags work everywhere”: The pragmatic functions of spoken hashtags. Discourse, Context and Media, 22, 57-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.07.002
Shapp, A. (2014). Variation in the use of Twitter hashtags. Retrieved from https://www.nyu.edu/projects/shapp/Shapp_QP2_Hashtags_Final.pdf
Tamara A. S. (2011). What the hashtag? Information, Communication & Society, 14(6), 872-895. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2011.554572
Wikström, P. (2014). #srynotfunny: Communicative functions of hashtags on Twitter. SKY Journal of Linguistics. 27, 127–152. http://www.linguistics.fi/julkaisut/SKY2014/Wikstrom.pdf
Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society 13(5). 788–806. DOI: 10.1177/1461444810385097
Zappavigna, M., (2015). Searchable talk: the linguistic function of hashtags. Social Semiotics, 25(3), 274-291. DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2014.996948
Zimmer, B. (2011, September 23). The art of the self-mocking hashtag. Word routes: Exploring the pathways of our lexicon. Retrieved from shorturl.at/kuDV9