Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number3  September 2020                                             Pp.515-536
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.34

Full Paper PDF

 

The English Verb  See  in Fiction Writing: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis 

Ruaa Talal Jumaah
Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Sabariah Md Rashid
 Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Mohd Azidan Bin Abdul  Jabar
Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

Afida  Mohamad  Ali
Faculty of Modern Languages and Communication,
Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.

 

Abstract:
The study aims at unraveling the conceptual metaphor underlying the English verb of visual perception see in fiction writing.  It has two research questions: 1) What are the conceptual metaphors underlying the linguistic expressions of the English verb of visual perception see in fiction writing and 2)  What are the theoretical implications of MIND-AS-BODY theory on the motivation of conceptual metaphors underlying the  English verb of visual perception see. This study adopts a qualitative approach and is situated within the field of cognitive semantics. A corpus of English fiction writing between the period of 2010 and 2017 was compiled from different sources comprising one million words.  Specifically, a sample consisting of 1,000 examples of the English verb of visual perception see was randomly extracted from the corpus using the AntConc 3.5.0 concordancer. The Metaphor Identification Procedures (MIP) were used to identify the metaphorical linguistic expressions in the corpus, and Lakoff and Johnson’s (2003) as well as Sweetser’s (1990) analytical frameworks were adopted for data analysis. The data analysis revealed various conceptual metaphors underlying the English verb see. These conceptual metaphors are related to the domains of knowledge, intellections, and understanding which support  Sweetser’s claim regarding the primacy of vision in motivating metaphors of cognition in human speech and thought. Thus, this study contributes to the literature on verbs of perception, particularly verbs of visual perception, as it is the first to address the conceptual metaphors underlying the verb see in  English using a real authentic corpus of fiction writing.
Keywords: MIND-AS-BODY conceptual metaphor, conceptual metaphor theory, verbs of perception, verbs of visual perception, vision metaphor, fiction writing

Cite as: Jumaah, R. T., Rashid, S.M., Abdul  Jabar, M. Z., &  Ali, A. M. (2020). The English Verb  See  in Fiction Writing: A Cognitive Semantic Analysis. Arab World English Journal11 (3) 515-536 .
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.34

References 

Al-Asmer, S. (2007) Alfazal-`ql wa al-jawarih fi Al- Quran Al-Kareem: Dirasat ihsa’iyat [Phrases of mind and body in the Holy Quran: A quantitative semantic study]. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis).: Najah national university, Nablus, Palestine

Alfaifi, A., & Atwell, E. (2016). Comparative evaluation of tools for Arabic corpora search and analysis. International Journal of Speech Technology19(2), 347-357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-015-9285-5

Al-Shunnag, M. (2016). Translating conceptual metaphor in popular biomedical texts from English to Arabic. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).University of Salford.

Barcelona, A. (1997). Clarifying and applying the notions of metaphor and metonymy within Cognitive Linguistics. Atlantis XIX.1: 21-48.

Blendea, S.  (2015). Prototypical meanings in perception verbs. Letter and Social Science Series, 2, 92-97.

Caballero, R.,  & Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013).Ways of perceiving, moving and thinking: Re-vindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics,5 (1-2), 268-290.

Carello, C. & Turvey, M. (2019). Challenging the Axioms of perception: The retinal image and the visibility of light. In B. J.Wagman & J. J. C. Blau (Eds.),   Perception as information detection: reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception (51-70), New York: Routlege.

Deignan, A. (2017). From linguistic to conceptual metaphors. In E. Semino, & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaphor and Language (pp. 102-116). London: Routledge

Deignan, A., & Cameron, L. (2009). A re-examination of seeing is understanding. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics,V (1-2), 220-243.

De Grado, T. (2016). English perception verbs: A syntactico-semantic corpus-based description. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Huelva, Spain.

Cobuild, Collins (2018). Collins Cobuild Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (9th ed.). London: HarperCollins Publishers Limited.

Essa, D. (2010). The semantic range of the verbs of perception in English and Arabic: A contrastive study. Journal of Human Sciences,1 (2), 622-662 .

Evans, N., & Wilkins, D. (2000). In the mind’s ear: The semantic extensions of perception verbs in Australian languages. Language76(3), 546-92. https://doi.org/10.4000/jso.6358

Evans, V. (2019).Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fedriani, C. & Sansó, A. (eds.). (2017). Pragmatic markers, discourse markers and modal particles: New perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Compan.

Fillmore, C. (2006). Frame semantics. In D. Geeraerts, R. Dirven, J. R. Taylor (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics basic readings  (pp.373–400). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

Franchak, J. (2019). Looking with the head and eyes. In B. J.Wagman & J. J. C. Blau (Eds.),   Perception as information detection: reflections on Gibson’s ecological approach to visual perception (205-221). New York: Routlege.

Fulk, R. D. (2018). A Comparative grammar of the early Germanic languages. Amsterdam/ Feladelphia:  John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Goldstein, E. & Brockmole, J. (2016). Sensation and perception. Boston: Wadsworth.

Gunnarsdóttir, A. (2013). Conceptual metaphors in perception verbs:A comparative analysis in English and Icelandic. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of Iceland, Iceland.

Hornby, A. S. (2015). Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary (9th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University press.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (1999). Polysemy and metaphor in perception verbs: A cross linguistic study. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of  Edinburgh.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013a). The power of the senses and the role of.culture in metaphor and language. In  R. Caballero & J. Diaz-Vera (Eds.), Sensuous cognition: exploration into the human sentience; imagination, (e)motion and perception  (pp.109-131). Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton.

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2013b). The relationship between conceptual metaphor and culture. Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (2), 315 – 339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2013-0014

Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2019). Perception metaphors in cognitive linguistics: Scope, motivation, and lexicalization. In  L. Speed, C. O’Meara, L. San Roque & A. Majid (Eds.), Perception metaphors (pp. 43–64). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Johnson, M. (1992). Philosophical implications of cognitive semantics. Cognitive Linguistics,3 (4), 345-366. http//:doi.10.1515/cogl.1992.3.4.345

Kövecses, Z. (2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Kuboto, M. (2016). A cognitive linguistic analysis of visual perception verbs in natural language ―with special reference to English verbs “look” and “see”. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Kansai Gaidai University. Japan

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors We Live By. (2nd ed).Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.   (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Langacker, R. W. (2015). Construal. In E. Dabrowski & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 120- 143). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.

Li, Z. (2013).  A comparative survey of vision metaphors based on the corpus in English and Chinese.Theory and Practice in Language Studies3 (7), 1232-1242. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.7.1232-1242

MacArthur, F & Krennmayr, T, & Littlemore, J. (2015). How basic is “UNDERSTANDING/KNOWING IS SEEING” when reasoning about knowledge? Asymmetric uses of sight metaphors in office hours consultations in English as academic lingua franca. Metaphor and Symbol,30 (3), 184-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049507

Mather, G. (2016). Foundation of sensation and perception. (3rd ed.) London: Psychology Press.

Neagu, M. (2013). What is universal and what is language-specific in the polysemy of perception verbs?  RRL, LVIII3,  329–343.

Oanch, T. (2016). A semantic study on verbs of human senses in English under cognitive linguistics (versus Vietnamese). Paper presented atThe Asian Conference on Language Learning, Japan, 2016, Art Center of Kobe.

Paradis, C. (2015a). Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Paradis, C. (2015b). Conceptual spaces at work in sensory cognition: Domains, dimensions and distances. In P. Gärdenfors, & F. Zenker (Eds.), Applications of geometric knowledge representation (pp. 33–55). Berlin: Springer Verlag.

Peterson, A. (2016). The five most popular genres in fiction – and why they matter. writers write. https://writerswrite.co.za/the-17-most-popular-genres-in-fiction-and-why-they-matter/

Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography.(2nd ed.). New York: Sage Publication Ltd.

Pragglejaz Group (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor & Symbol, 22 (1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/10926480709336752

Rundell, M. (2007). Macmillan English dictionary for advanced learners (2nd ed). Oxford: Macmillan.

Rylina, G. (2013). Contrastive study of a perception verb in English and Russian: Feel vs čuvstvovat. (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Ghent University, Russia.

San Roque, L., Kendrick, K. H., Norcliffe, E., Brown, P., Defina, R., Dingemanse, M., & Majid, A. (2015). Vision verbs dominate in conversation across cultures, but the ranking of non-visual verbs varies. Cognitive Linguistics26(1), 31-60. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0089

Schwartz, B., & Krantz, J. (2017). Sensation and perception. Los Angeles: Sage Publication Ltd.

Sekuler, R., &  Blake, R. (2005). Perception (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Serres, M. (2016). The five senses: A philosophy of mingled bodies. London: Bloomsbury.

Spence, Ch., & Bayne, T. (2015). Is conciousness multisensory?. In D. Stokes, M. Matthen, & S. Biggs (Eds.), Perception and its modalities (pp. 95–132). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics. metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tissari, H.  (2017) corpus-linguistic approaches to metaphor analysis. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 117-130). London: Routledge.

Vanhove, M. (2008). Semantic associations between sensory modalities, prehension and mental perceptions: A cross-linguistic perspective. In M. Vanhove (Ed.), Studies in language companion series (pp. 341–370). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Viberg, A. (1983). The verbs of perception: A typological study. In B. Butterworth, B. Comrie & Ö. Dahl (Eds.), Explanations for language universals (pp. 123-62). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Viberg, Å. (2015). Sensation, perception and cognition. Swedish in a typological-contrastive perspective. Functions of Language, 22(1), 96–131. https://doi 10.1075/fol.22.1.05vib

Walter, E.  (2008). Cambridge advanced learner’s dictionary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weisser, M. (2016). Practical corpus linguistics: An introduction to corpus-based language analysis. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Winter, B. (2019). Sensory linguistics: Language, perception and metaphor. Amsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.34
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Ruaa Talal Jumaah is a PhD candidate at the Department of English, Faculty of Modern
Languages and Communication, University Putra Malaysia. Her research interests are in
cognitive semantics, corpus linguistics and applied comparative linguistics. ORCID:
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1238-1907