Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of  2nd  MEC TESOL Conference   2020                      Pp.64-83

Full Paper PDF


  The Effectiveness of Teacher Electronic Feedback in Asynchronous Teaching: A Case
Study of Foundation Students at Sultan Qaboos University

Tareq Monther Al Damen
Centre for Preparatory Studies, Sultan Qaboos University
Sultanate of Oman



Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, educational systems worldwide, including Oman, were affected as this led to temporary closures of schools, colleges, and universities. In response to such closures, many countries decided to continue offering education through distance learning. Similarly, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), the only government university in Oman, opted for asynchronous teaching through Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT).  Through ERT, there is a temporary shift in instructional delivery. Its primary aim is to provide temporary access to instruction and support materials quickly and reliably during the crisis.  Asynchronous teaching provides students with flexibility to access the materials posted by teachers whenever they can, leaving teachers with many challenges. One of these challenges is the ability to offer proper feedback to students. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the perceptions of both teachers and students on the electronic feedback provided in ERT. A total of 8 teachers 80 students enrolled in the foundation program at SQU participated in the study. The responses of both teachers and students were collected through online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings of the study indicate that some feedback methods seemed to be more effective. The study also identified the challenges faced by both students and teachers in terms of electronic feedback. Furthermore, the study gives suggestions to improve electronic feedback methods.
Keywords: asynchronous feedback, emergency remote teaching (ERT), foundation program (FP), synchronous feedback, Sultan Qaboos University, teacher electronic feedback (TEF)

Cite as: Al Damen, T. M..  (2020). The Effectiveness of Teacher Electronic Feedback in Asynchronous Teaching: A Case Study of Foundation Students at Sultan Qaboos UniversityArab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of  2nd  MEC TESOL Conference 2020. 64-83


Barker, L. (2020). Learn why today’s new remote teaching experience is not the same as established online courses. Grantham University. Retrieved from

Boyes, N. (2016). Building autonomy through collaborative writing with Google Docs. CUE Journal9(2), 228-238.

Case, A. (2020). Why your students have problems with listening comprehension – Available at

Carroll, M., Razvi, S., Goodliffe, T., & Al‐Habsi, F. (2009). Progress in Developing a National Quality Management System for Higher Education in Oman. Quality in Higher Education15(1), 17-27.

Chong, S. (2019). College students’ perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education44(7), 1090-1105.

Ene, E., & Upton, T. (2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System46, 80-95.

Edeiken-Cooperman, N., & Berenato, C. (2014). Students’ Perceptions of Electronic Feedback as an Alternative to Handwritten Feedback: One University’s Inquiry. Journal of Education and Learning3(1), 79-85.

Fanous, L. (2020). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous e-feedback. أوراق ثقافية مجلة الأداب والعلوم الإنسانية2(6). Retrieved from

Gon, S., & Rawekar, A. (2017). Effectivity of E-Learning through Whatsapp as a Teaching Learning Tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences4(1), 19-25.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review. Retrieved from

Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies10(2), 171.

Khalil, Z. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal2(2), 33-48.

Khlaif, Z., & Salha, S. (2020). The unanticipated challenges of developing countries in Covid-19 crisis: A brief report. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences11(2), 130-134.

Liang, M. (2010). Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision related discourse. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators14(1), 45-64.

Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Erlbaum: Routledge.

Moses, R., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges Faced by Students and Teachers on Writing Skills in ESL Contexts: A Literature Review. Creative Education10(13), 3385-3391.

Oman academic standards for general foundation programs. (2020). Retrieved from

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.

Rambe, P., & Chipunza, C. (2013). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively generated resources: A case of ‎WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African university‎. In International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICAICTE 2013), 331-337. India. Retrieved from

Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology44(4), 544-561.

Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal100(1), 296-319.

Shisley, S. (2020, May). Emergency Remote Learning Compared to Online Learning. Learning Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from

Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research78(1), 153-189.

Tom, A., Morni, A., Metom, L., & Joe, S. (2013). Students’ Perception and Preferences of Written Feedback in Academic Writing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(11), 72-80.

Trust, T. (2020). The 3 Biggest Remote Teaching Concerns We Need to Solve Now – EdSurge News. EdSurge. Retrieved from

Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition21(2), 217-235.

UNESCO (2020). UNESCO Report reveals lack of education laws to ensure inclusive education during COVID-19. Retrieved from

Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2011). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Language Learning62(1), 1-41.

Wadia, L. (2020). Graduating from emergency remote teaching to online higher education in India | ORF. ORF. Retrieved from

Weirick, J., Davis, T., &Lawson, D. (2017). Writer L1/L2 Status and Asynchronous Online Writing Center Feedback: Consultant Response Patterns. Writing Assistance Review, 22(2), 9-38.

Wihastyanang, W., & Latief, M.A. (2018). The impact of electronic feedback on students’ writing quality. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 5(12), 56-67.

Wong, G., & Yang, M. (2017). Using ICT to Facilitate Instant and Asynchronous Feedback for Students’ Learning Engagement and Improvements. In S. Kong, T. Wong, M. Yang, C. Chow, & K. Tse (Eds.), Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era (pp. 289-309). Springer.


Tareq Monther Al Damen is an assistant lecturer at the Centre for Preparatory Studies at Sultan
Qaboos University. He received his PhD in TESOL, University of Malaya, Malaysia in 2013. He
has a teaching experience of more than 16 years at tertiary level. His research interests are
communication strategies, extensive reading, and learner autonomy.