Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020 Pp.64-83
The Effectiveness of Teacher Electronic Feedback in Asynchronous Teaching: A Case
Study of Foundation Students at Sultan Qaboos University
Tareq Monther Al Damen
Centre for Preparatory Studies, Sultan Qaboos University
Sultanate of Oman
Due to the Covid-19 pandemic, educational systems worldwide, including Oman, were affected as this led to temporary closures of schools, colleges, and universities. In response to such closures, many countries decided to continue offering education through distance learning. Similarly, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), the only government university in Oman, opted for asynchronous teaching through Emergency Remote Teaching (ERT). Through ERT, there is a temporary shift in instructional delivery. Its primary aim is to provide temporary access to instruction and support materials quickly and reliably during the crisis. Asynchronous teaching provides students with flexibility to access the materials posted by teachers whenever they can, leaving teachers with many challenges. One of these challenges is the ability to offer proper feedback to students. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the perceptions of both teachers and students on the electronic feedback provided in ERT. A total of 8 teachers 80 students enrolled in the foundation program at SQU participated in the study. The responses of both teachers and students were collected through online questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The findings of the study indicate that some feedback methods seemed to be more effective. The study also identified the challenges faced by both students and teachers in terms of electronic feedback. Furthermore, the study gives suggestions to improve electronic feedback methods.
Keywords: asynchronous feedback, emergency remote teaching (ERT), foundation program (FP), synchronous feedback, Sultan Qaboos University, teacher electronic feedback (TEF)
Cite as: Al Damen, T. M.. (2020). The Effectiveness of Teacher Electronic Feedback in Asynchronous Teaching: A Case Study of Foundation Students at Sultan Qaboos UniversityArab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020. 64-83
Barker, L. (2020). Learn why today’s new remote teaching experience is not the same as established online courses. Grantham University. Retrieved from https://www.grantham.edu/blog/remote-teaching-vs-online-learning-in-higher-education-today/.
Boyes, N. (2016). Building autonomy through collaborative writing with Google Docs. CUE Journal, 9(2), 228-238.
Case, A. (2020). Why your students have problems with listening comprehension – UsingEnglish.com. Available at https://www.usingenglish.com/articles/why-your-students-have-problems-with-listening-comprehension.html#.
Carroll, M., Razvi, S., Goodliffe, T., & Al‐Habsi, F. (2009). Progress in Developing a National Quality Management System for Higher Education in Oman. Quality in Higher Education, 15(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320902731328
Chong, S. (2019). College students’ perception of e-feedback: a grounded theory perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 1090-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1572067
Ene, E., & Upton, T. (2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System, 46, 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.011
Edeiken-Cooperman, N., & Berenato, C. (2014). Students’ Perceptions of Electronic Feedback as an Alternative to Handwritten Feedback: One University’s Inquiry. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(1), 79-85. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v3n1p79
Fanous, L. (2020). The impact of synchronous and asynchronous e-feedback. أوراق ثقافية مجلة الأداب والعلوم الإنسانية, 2(6). Retrieved from https://www.awraqthaqafya.com/825/.
Gon, S., & Rawekar, A. (2017). Effectivity of E-Learning through Whatsapp as a Teaching Learning Tool. MVP Journal of Medical Sciences, 4(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.18311/mvpjms/0/v0/i0/8454
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The Difference between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning.
Hyland, F. (2010). Future directions in feedback on second language writing: Overview and research agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119251
Khalil, Z. (2018). EFL Students’ Perceptions towards Using Google Docs and Google Classroom as Online Collaborative Tools in Learning Grammar. Applied Linguistics Research Journal, 2(2), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.14744/alrj.2018.47955
Khlaif, Z., & Salha, S. (2020). The unanticipated challenges of developing countries in Covid-19 crisis: A brief report. Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, 11(2), 130-134.
Liang, M. (2010). Using synchronous online peer response groups in EFL writing: Revision related discourse. Language Learning & Technology: A Refereed Journal for Second and Foreign Language Educators, 14(1), 45-64.
Long, M. (2007). Problems in SLA. Erlbaum: Routledge.
Moses, R., & Mohamad, M. (2019). Challenges Faced by Students and Teachers on Writing Skills in ESL Contexts: A Literature Review. Creative Education, 10(13), 3385-3391. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1013260
Oman academic standards for general foundation programs. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.oaaa.gov.om/Docs/GFP%20Standards%20FINAL.pdf.
Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback : all that effort, but what is the effect? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903541007
Rambe, P., & Chipunza, C. (2013). Using mobile devices to leverage student access to collaboratively generated resources: A case of WhatsApp instant messaging at a South African university. In International Conference on Advanced Information and Communication Technology for Education (ICAICTE 2013), 331-337. India. Retrieved from https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icaicte-13/8846.
Rambe, P., & Bere, A. (2013). Using mobile instant messaging to leverage learner participation and transform pedagogy at a South African University of Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 544-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12057
Shintani, N., & Aubrey, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective Feedback on Grammatical Accuracy in a Computer-Mediated Environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296-319. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12317
Shisley, S. (2020, May). Emergency Remote Learning Compared to Online Learning. Learning Solutions Magazine. Retrieved from https://learningsolutionsmag.com/articles/emergency-remote-learning-compared-to-online-learning.
Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
Tom, A., Morni, A., Metom, L., & Joe, S. (2013). Students’ Perception and Preferences of Written Feedback in Academic Writing. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(11), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2013.v4n11p72
Trust, T. (2020). The 3 Biggest Remote Teaching Concerns We Need to Solve Now – EdSurge News. EdSurge. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-04-02-the-3-biggest-remote-teaching-concerns-we-need-to-solve-now.
Tuzi, F. (2004). The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course. Computers and Composition, 21(2), 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003
UNESCO (2020). UNESCO Report reveals lack of education laws to ensure inclusive education during COVID-19. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/news/unesco-report-reveals-lack-education-laws-ensure-inclusive-education-during-covid-19.
Van Beuningen, C., De Jong, N., & Kuiken, F. (2011). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing. Language Learning, 62(1), 1-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.x
Wadia, L. (2020). Graduating from emergency remote teaching to online higher education in India | ORF. ORF. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/graduating-emergency-remote-teaching-online-higher-education-india-67279/.
Weirick, J., Davis, T., &Lawson, D. (2017). Writer L1/L2 Status and Asynchronous Online Writing Center Feedback: Consultant Response Patterns. Writing Assistance Review, 22(2), 9-38.
Wihastyanang, W., & Latief, M.A. (2018). The impact of electronic feedback on students’ writing quality. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 5(12), 56-67.
Wong, G., & Yang, M. (2017). Using ICT to Facilitate Instant and Asynchronous Feedback for Students’ Learning Engagement and Improvements. In S. Kong, T. Wong, M. Yang, C. Chow, & K. Tse (Eds.), Emerging Practices in Scholarship of Learning and Teaching in a Digital Era (pp. 289-309). Springer.