Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL Number 6. July 2020                      Pp. 357-378

Full Paper PDF 


 The Effect of Using Padlet as a Vocabulary Knowledge Enhancement Application on Saudi
EFL Female Learners, and their Attitudes toward its Value in Learning


Abbad M Alabbad
 College of Languages and Translation,
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Hadeel Saad Bin Huwamel
 College of Languages and Translation
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia



This study aimed to investigate the effects of using the digital learning tool Padlet to teach English vocabulary to Saudi females learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) within the context of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT). Specifically, it examined the attitudes and thoughts of these females toward the application and the effectiveness of using it as a learning platform. The study was set out to answer two questions; the first questions is “How effective is the application Padlet with regard to using a CLT approach to teach English vocabulary skills to Saudi female EFL learners?” while the second one is “What are users’ attitudes toward the online learning platform Padlet?”. The experiment was conducted for two weeks using Padlet. The population size was 50 Saudi females who were level-eight students at the English Language and Translation Department of Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. After inclusion criteria (i.e., the results of an English language placement test) were applied, 30 students were selected for the study; this was done to ensure that the group was homogenous with regard to the level of English skill. The remaining participants then took a pretest; subsequently, the researcher and subjects engaged in seven instruction sessions using Padlet, during which the researcher followed a Communicative Language Teaching approach to presenting English vocabulary. After the experiment was concluded, the participants were given a posttest identical to the pretest in order to assess their knowledge and compare their vocabularies before and after the instructions were provided. In addition, the participants responded to an online survey designed to measure their attitudes toward Padlet. The participants’ scores and mean scores were calculated using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS); specifically, a one-sample t-test and a paired sample t-test were conducted. The findings revealed that the vocabulary instructions given using Padlet were effective at improving the English lexical knowledge of learners. The survey also revealed that the learners’ attitudes toward the tool were positive. Finally, the results indicated that the implementation of Communicative Language Teaching through Padlet was crucial to developing the participants’ English vocabulary skills.
Keywords: Arab EFL, attitude, CLT, Collaborative Learning, Communicative Language Teaching, Computer-Assisted Language Learning, constructive learning, e-learning, English as a foreign language female learners, English vocabulary enhancement, Padlet, Saudi EFL, Saudi Female EFL
Cite as:  Alabbad, A., &  Bin Huwamel, H. S.  (2020). The Effect of Using Padlet as a Vocabulary Knowledge Enhancement Application on Saudi EFL Female Learners, and their Attitudes toward its Value in Learning. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL (6) 357-378.


Ab Hamid, A., Rosli, L. N., & Yunus, M. M. (2019). Wall attack in padlet in enhancing vocabulary acquisition. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences9(1).

Abebe, T. T., Davidson, L. M., & Biru, F. (2012). The Role of Instructors in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching Methodology. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 52-62.

Algraini, F. N. A. (2014). The effect of using padlet on enhancing EFL writing performance. (Unpublished Master Dissertation). Al-Imam Muhammad Ibn Saud Islamic University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Alqahtani, M. (2015). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International journal of teaching and educationIII(3), 21-34.

Awaludin, F. A., Abd Karim, R., & Mohd Saad, N. H. (2017). Padlet: A digital collaborative tool for academic writing. Journal of Education and Social Sciences8(1), 179-184.‏

Bansal, A., Sharma, S. M., Kumar, K., Aggarwal, A., Goyal, S., Choudhary, K., … & Bhasin, M. (2012). Classification of flames in computer mediated communications. International Journal of Computer Applications, 14(6), 21-26.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy,(3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research: An introduction to the theory and practice of second language research for graduate/master’s students in TESOL and applied linguistics, and others. Oxford: Oxford university press.

Cambridge Dictionary (2020). Vocabulary. Retrieved from

Clements, D. (1998). Young children and technology. Dialogue on Early Childhood Science, Math, and Technology Education. American Association for Advancement of Science.

Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York: Teachers College Press.

Dakhi, S., & Fitria, T. N. (2019). The Principles and the Teaching of English Vocabulary: A Review. Journal of English Teaching5(1).

Delgado, A. J., Wardlow, L., McKnight, K., & O’Malley, K. (2015). Educational technology: A review of the integration, resources, and effectiveness of technology in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education14, 397-416.

Dewitt, D., Alias, N., & Siraj, S. (2015). Collaborative learning: Interactive debates using Padlet in a higher education institution. In International Educational Technology Conference. Istanbul, Turkey.

Dina, A. T., & Ciornei, S. I. (2013). The advantages and disadvantages of computer assisted language learning and teaching for foreign languages. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences76, 248-252.

Dingle, K., & Lebedev, J. R. (2007). Vocabulary Power 2. Upper Saddle River, United States. Pearson Education.

Ducate, L., & Lomicka, L. (2009). Podcasting: An effective tool for honing language students’ pronunciation?. Language Learning & Technology13(3), 66-86.

Egbert, J., Paulus, T. M., & Nakamichi, Y. (2002). The impact of CALL instruction on classroom computer use: A foundation for rethinking technology in teacher education. Language Learning & Technology6(3), 108-126.

Farrah, M., & Tushyeh, H. (2010). Enhancing the English reading and writing skills of Palestinian English majors by using CALL. Hebron University Research Journal, 5(2), 259-282.

Fisher, C. D. (2017) . Padlet: An Online Tool for Learner Engagement and Collaboration. Padlet. Academic of Management Learning and Education, 16(1), 163-165.

Fuchs, B. (2014). The writing is on the wall: using Padlet for whole-class engagement. LOEX Quarterly40(4), 7-9.

Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary in EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies. Novitas-royal1(2), 84-91.

Han, I., & Shin, W. S. (2016). The use of a mobile learning management system and academic achievement of online students. Computers & Education102, 79-89.

Hani, N. A. B. (2014). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching in the Arab world: Jordan as a model. Theory and Practice in Language Studies4(8), 1609-1615.

Haris, M., Yunus, M. M., & Badusah, J. H. (2017). The effectiveness of using Padlet in ESL classroom. International Journal of Advanced Research5(2), 783788.

Hong, X. (2010). Review of Effects of Glosses on Incidental Vocabulary Learning and Reaing Comprehension. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press)33(1), 56-73.

Hu, W. (2010). Communicative language teaching in the Chinese environment. Online Submission, 7(6), 78-82.

Hubbard, P. (2008). CALL and the future of language teacher education. CALICO journal25(2), 175-188.

Huyen, N. T. T., & Nga, K. T. T. (2003). Learning vocabulary through games. Asian EFL Journal5(4), 90-105.

I lter, B. G. (2009). Effect of technology on motivation in EFL classrooms. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education10(4), 136-158.

Ismawardani, B. M., & Sulistyanto, I. (2019). The Effectiveness of Teaching Writing by Using Padlet as the Media. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency1(2), 66-71. ‏

Jabar, N., & Ali, A. M. (2016). Cultural video project assignment (VPA) through the eyes of young ESL learners: A multi-modal vocabulary learning approach. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics1(2), 157-173.

Jackson, L. A., Von Eye, A., Witt, E. A., Zhao, Y., & Fitzgerald, H. E. (2011). A longitudinal study of the effects of Internet use and videogame playing on academic performance and the roles of gender, race and income in these relationships. Computers in Human Behavior27(1), 228-239.

Johnson, K., & Johnson, H. (Eds.). (1998). Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Kavanagh, B. (2012). The theory and practice of communicative language teaching in Japan. Academic Research International2(2), 730-738.

Kleinsmith, C. L. (2017). The effects of using Padlet on the academic performance and engagement of students in a fifth-grade basic skills mathematics classroom. (Published Master Thesis). Rowan University

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Prentice New York: Hall.

Lai, C. C., & Kritsonis, W. A. (2006). The advantages and disadvantages of computer technology in second language acquisition. Online Submission3(1).

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University.

Lee, L. (2002). Enhancing learners’ communication skills through synchronous electronic interaction and task‐based instruction. Foreign Language Annals35(1), 16-24.

Lestari, P. Y., & Kurniawan, E. H. (2018). Padlet as Media to Improve Writing Mastery of English Department Students of Uniska 2015-2016. Engl. FRANCA Acad. J. Engl. Lang. Educ. STAIN Curup, vol, 2(1), 1-12.

Littlewood, W., & William, L. (1981). Communicative language teaching: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Llieva, J., Baron, S., & Healey, N. M. (2002). Online surveys in marketing research. International Journal of Market Research, 44(3), 1-14.

Mahmud, M. Z. (2019). Students’ perceptions of using padlet as a learning tool for English writing. Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT)7(2), 29-39.

Matias, A., & Wolf, D. F. (2013). Engaging students in online courses through the use of mobile technology. In Increasing student engagement and retention using mobile applications: Smartphones, Skype and texting technologies. Learners Creative Education, 10, 610-620. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

McCarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments: Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(6), 729-740.

McLelland, N. (2017). Teaching and learning foreign languages: A history of language education, assessment and policy in Britain. 711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017. Taylor & Francis.

Morin, D., Thomas, J. D., & Saadé, R. G. (2012). Activities and resources in online learning: From a critical thinking view. In Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE) 2012, Montreal, Canada (pp. 597-602).

Musumeci, D. (2009). History of language teaching. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 42-62). Chichester: Blackwell.

Nation, I. S. (2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nurviyani, V. (2018). Fostering College Student’s Critical Reading Skill Through Padlet Application. BAHTERA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra17(1), 66-73.

Olsen, A. K., & Chernobilsky, E. (2016). The effects of technology on academic motivation and achievement in a middle school mathematics classroom. NERA Conference Proceedings, 2, 1-17.

Outhwaite, L. A., Faulder, M., Gulliford, A., & Pitchford, N. J. (2019). Raising early achievement in math with interactive apps: A randomized control trial. Journal of Educational Psychology111(2), 284-298.

Parkison, P., & Thomas, J. A. (2018). Using Web 2.0 Tools to Engage Content, Promote Self-Efficacy, and Implications for Intentional Student Learning. In P. Parkison, & J. A. Thomas (eds.), Innovative Applications of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (pp. 42-62). IGI Global.

Pechenkina, E., Laurence, D., Oates, G., Eldridge, D., & Hunter, D. (2017). Using a gamified mobile app to increase student engagement, retention and academic achievement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education14(1), 1-12.

Rahimi, E., van den Berg, J., & Veen, W. (2014). Investigating teachers’ perception about the educational benefits of Web 2.0 personal learning environments. The PLE Conference 2013: Learning and Diversity in the Cities of the Future (pp. 175-194).

Rashid, A. (2015). Enhancing class activities using Padlet: A teacher’s reflection.

Rashid, A. A., Yunus, M. M., & Wahi, W. (2019). Using Padlet for collaborative writing among ESL learners. Creative Education10(3), 610-620.

Rashid, T., & Asghar, H. M. (2016). Technology use, self-directed learning, student engagement and academic performance: Examining the interrelations. Computers in Human Behavior63, 604-612.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: A description and analysis. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved from

Rivers, W. M. (1987). Interaction as the key to teaching language for communication. In W. M. Rivers (ed.), Interactive language teaching (pp. 3-16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Sadik, A. (2008). Digital storytelling: A meaningful technology-integrated approach for engaged student learning. Educational technology research and development56, 487-506.

Saepuloh, A., & Salsabila, V. A. (2020). THE TEACHING OF WRITING RECOUNT TEXTS BY UTILIZING PADLET. Indonesian EFL Journal6(1), 45-54.

Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers & Education144, 103710.

Saidin, N. F., Halim, N. D. A., & Yahaya, N. (2015). A review of research on augmented reality in education: Advantages and applications. International education studies8(13), 1-8.

Sandholtz, J. H., Ringstaff, C., & Dwyer, D. C. (1997). Teaching with technology: Creating student-centered classrooms. New York: Teachers College Press.

Schmitt, N (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Sekiziyivu, S., & Mugimu, C. B. (2017). Communicative language teaching strategies for German as a foreign language in Uganda. Journal of Language Teaching and Research8(1), 8-15.

Sivin-Kachala, J. P., Bialo, E., & Langford, J. (2000). 2000 Research Report on the Effectiveness of Technology in Schools (7th ed.). Washington, DC:  SIIA.

Spinath, B. (2012). Academic achievement. Encyclopedia of Human Behavior.

Strommen, E. F., & Lincoln, B. (1992). Constructivism, technology, and the future of classroom learning. Education and urban society24(4), 466-476.

Toti, U. (2018). Investigating University Level Efl Undergraduate Learners’ Attitudes about Padlet: A Web-Based Digital Tool In Reading Classroom. Journal of Linguistics & Literature1(1), 221-242.‏

Uzunboylu, H., Bicen, H., & Cavus, N. (2011). The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and Windows live spaces. Computers & Education56(3), 720-726. Elsevier Ltd.

Verhoeven, L. (1997). Experimental methods in researching language and education. In Encyclopedia of language and education (Vol. 8, pp. 79-87). Springer, Dordrecht.

Warschauer, M. (1995). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO journal13(2), 7-26.

Wilkins, D. A. (1972). Vocabulary. Linguistics in language teaching. Australia: Edward Arnold.

Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2007). The relationship between computer-mediated-communication competence, apprehension, self-efficacy, perceived confidence, and social presence. Southern Communication Journal72(4), 355-378.

Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching Internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of computer-mediated communication10(3), 1-24. JCMC1034.

Wu, Y. (2009). The application of CLT in college English vocabulary teaching. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(3), 128-131.

Yang, W., & Dai, W. (2011). Rote memorization of vocabulary and vocabulary development. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 61-64.

Yun, G. W., & Trumbo, C. W. (2000). Comparative response to a survey executed by post, e-mail, & web form. Journal of computer-mediated communication6(1), JCMC613.

Yunus, M. M., & Salehi, H. (2012). The effectiveness of Facebook groups on teaching and improving writing: Students’ perceptions. International journal of education and information Technologies1(6), 87-96.

Zainuddin, N. M. M., Azmi, N. F. M., Yusoff, R. C. M., Shariff, S. A., & Hassan, W. A. W. (2020). Enhancing Classroom Engagement Through Padlet as a Learning Tool: A Case Study. International Journal of Innovative Computing10(1).

Zhang, M., Trussell, R. P., Gallegos, B., & Asam, R. R. (2015). Using math apps for improving student learning: An exploratory study in an inclusive fourth grade classroom. TechTrends59(2), 32-39.

Zhou, G., & Niu, X. (2015). Approaches to language teaching and learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research6(4), 798-802.


Dr. Abbad M Alabbad is an assistant professor at the School of Languages and Translation, King
Saud University (KSU) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Alabbad studied his master’s degree in
Linguistics and Applied Linguistics in West Virginia University, USA, then completed his PhD
studies in Computer Assisted Language at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia .
His main research interests are in CALL, WALL, and discourse analysis. ORCID:

Hadeel Saad Bin Huwamel is a master’s graduate from the School of Languages and Translation,
KSU in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. She obtained her BA in English Languages and Translation at Imam
Muhammad Bin Saud University. Afterwards, she started her studies in Theoretical Linguistics at
KSU. Among many fields of interest to Bin Huwamel are CALL, TEFL, and SLA. ORCID: