Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number1 March 2022 Pp.72-86
Teachers’ English Level Proficiency: Do Students Perceive It as a Threat or a Chance?
Department of English and Education
University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Department of English and Education
University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Corresponding email: email@example.com
Chandra Giat Prabowo
Postgraduates Program, Department of English and Education
University of Muhammadiyah Malang, Indonesia
Received: 11/2/2021 Accepted:2/2/2022 Published:3/24/2022
This study examines students’ expectations regarding teachers’ English proficiency level at Muhammadiyah Malang University (UMM), Indonesia. The concepts of proficiency are various among scholars and educators. Scholars vary in their concepts of proficiency; they also have multiple dimensions and methods when assessing teachers’ proficiency. However, students are rarely asked about their expectations of teachers’ English Proficiency level due to their supposed incapability and irrelevance in assessing the tutors. This study utilized an interpretive approach that explained the subjective reasons and meanings underlying social actions and viewed the world from specific individuals’ standpoints and experiences. Focus group discussion (FGD), and an open-ended questionnaire to gather the data, was employed. The FGD led to rich data because participants interacted at the same time about the topic being raised. The second-year students of the English Department at the University of Muhammadiyah Malang (UMM) were invited to participate. Regarding the teachers’ proficiency, students’ expectations fell into three parts. Firstly, teachers were expected to use mixed languages as the classroom language of instruction. Secondly, students expected teachers to possess sufficient level of English proficiency since this will potentially help students to have a better level of communication. Third, students are expected to have both native-speaking teachers and local teachers as a model of their communication. This study implicates teachers with high English proficiency are supposed to be vigilant to apply it across different settings and situations. This behavior hopefully leads to the felicitous decision of the classroom communication types.
Keywords: EFL Indonesia, English proficiency, student expectations, tertiary level
Cite as: Masduki, M., Poedjiastutie, D., & Prabowo, C. G. (2022). Teachers’ English Level Proficiency: Do Students
Perceive It as a Threat or a Chance? Arab World English Journal, 13 (1) 72-86.
Abduh, M., & Zainudin, A. (2016). Role of Indonesian teachers’ competencies in developing child-friendly school. Proceeding of the First International Conference on Child – Friendly Education, May 2016 (pp. 164-172). Surakarta, Indonesia: Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Adam, M. A. (2016). Role of vocabulary learning strategies in promoting EFL learners performance. [MA in English language (applied linguistic) thesis], Faculty of Languages, Sudan University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.sustech.edu/handle/123456789/15469
Addison, W. E., Best, J., & Warrington, J. D. (2006). Students’ perceptions of course difficulty and their ratings of the instructor. College Student Journal, 40(2), 409-416.
Ahmad, B. H., & Jusoff, K. (2009). Teacher’s code-switching in classroom instruction for low English proficient learners. English Language Teaching, 2(2), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v2n2p49.
Andrade, H. L., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In G. T. L. Brown & L. R. Harris (Eds.). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 319–334). New York: Routledge.
Aryani, F., & Umar, N. F. (2020). Factors affecting Z generation on selecting majors in the university: An Indonesian case. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11 (3), 109-133.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). California: Wadsworth.
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bailey, A. L., Huang, B. H. (2011). Do current English language development/proficiency standards reflect the English needed for success in school? Language Testing, 28(3), 343–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211404187
Bakic-Tomic, L., Dvorski, J., & Kirinic, A. (2015). Elements of teacher communication competence: An examination
of skills and knowledge to communicate. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 157-166.
Bennett, K. B. (2007). Teaching pronunciation: An independent course study for adult English as a second language learners. Retrieved from:
Blanche, P. (1990). Using standardised achievement and oral proficiency tests forself-assessment purposes: the DLIFC study. Language Testing, 7 (2): 202-229. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229000700205
Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston, Mass.: Pearson A & B.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417.
Carlsen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011). What about N? A methodological study of sample- size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(26). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-26
Coleman, H. (2009). Indonesia’s ‘international standard schools’: What are they for? Paper presented at the 8th Language and Development Conference, Dhaka, 23-25 June. https://www.academia.edu/705483/Indonesias_International_Standard_Schools_What_are_they_for
Creese, A., & Blockledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching?
Modern Language Journal, 94(1):103 – 115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00986.x
Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive academic language proficiency: linguistic interdependence, the optimum ages question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19., 197-205.
EF EPI. (2018). EF English proficiency index – full report. Available at: https://www.ef.com/__/~/media/centralefcom/epi/downloads/full-reports/v8/ef-epi-2018-english.pdf
Ferreira, A., & Santoso, A. (2008). Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance. Accounting & Finance, 48(2), 209 – 231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2007.00239.x
Firth, A., & Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA research.
The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285-300.
Freeman, D. (2017). The case for teachers’ classroom English proficiency. RELC Journal, 48(1), 31- 52.
Freitas, H., Oliveira, M., Jenkins, M., & Popjoy, O. (1998). The focus group, a qualitative research method: Reviewing the theory, and providing guidelines to its planning. Working-paper on ISRC (Information Systems Research Group), University of Baltimore, USA. Available at: http://gianti.ea.ufrgs.br/files/artigos/1998/1998_079_ISRC.pdf
García, O., & Kleyn, T. (Eds.). (2016). Translanguaging with multilingual students: Learning from classroom moments.
New York: Routledge.
Gardner, D. (2000). Self-assessment for autonomous language learners. Links & Letters, 7, 49- 60. Retrieved from: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38997684.pdf
Gultom, S. (2013, September 30). Materi Pelatihan Guru: Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 (Teacher Training Materials: 2013 Curriculum Implementation). Paper presented on National Education Quality Conference, Ambon, Maluku, Indonesia.
Hakim, A. (2015). Contribution of competence teacher (pedagogical, personality, professional competence and social) on the performance of learning. The International Journal of Engineering and Science (IJES), 4(2), 1-12.
Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Essex, England: Longman.
Jalal, F., Samani, M., Chang, M. C., Stevenson, R., Ragatz, A. B., & Negara, S. D. (2009). Teacher certification in Indonesia: A strategy for teacher quality improvement. Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia.
Jensen, C., Denver, L., Mees, I. M., & Werther, C. (2011). Students’ and teachers’ self- assessment of English language proficiency in English-medium higher education in Denmark – a questionnaire study. In B. Preisler, I. Klitgård & A. H. Fabricius (Eds.). Language and learning in the international university, from English uniformity to diversity and hybridity. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.
Kusumawati, A., Yanamandram, V. K., & Perera, N. (2010). Exploring student choice criteria for selecting an Indonesian public university: A preliminary finding. Centre for Health Service Development – CHSD. 35. https://ro.uow.edu.au/chsd/35
Lauder, A. (2008). The Status and function of English in Indonesia: A review of key factors. Makara, Sosial Humanoira, 12(1), 9-20.
Liu, M., & Jackson, J. (2008). An exploration of Chinese EFL learners’ unwillingness to communicate and foreign language anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 71- 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00687.x
Mahboob, A. (2018). Beyond global Englishes: Teaching English as a dynamic language. RELC Journal, 49(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688218754944
Medgyes, P. (2006). When the teacher is a non-native speaker. In Murcia, M.C. (Ed.). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 429-442). Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
OECD. (2019). TALIS 2018 results (Volume I): Teachers and school leaders as lifelong learners. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Oscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553228900600103
Palos, R., & Petrovici, M. C. (2014). Perceived importance of communication skills and their predictive value for academic performance. Revista de Cercetare si Interventie Sociala, 46, 85-98.
Poedjiastutie, D., Rohmah, A., & Rahagia, R. (2020). Is the local language allowed in EFL classrooms? The Journal of Asia TEFL, 17(4), 1422-1430. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2020.17.4.18.1422
Poedjiastutie, D., Amrin, Z.A., & Setiawan, Y. (2018). English communication competence: Expectations and challenges (A case in Indonesia). International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature (IJALEL), 7(6), 184-191.
Proboyo, A., & Soedarsono, R. (2015). Influential factors in choosing higher eduaction institution: A case study of a private university in Surabaya. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 9(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.9.1.1-7
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham:
The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Reeves, T. C., & Hedberg, J. G (2003). Interactive learning systems evaluation. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Renandya, W. A., Hamied, F. A., & Nurkamto, J. (2018). English language proficiency in Indonesia: Issues and prospects. THE JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 15(3), 618-629.
Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, pedagogy and performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059
Ross, S. (1998). Self-assessment in second language testing: A meta-analysis and analysis of experiential factors. Language Testing, 15(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229801500101
Schmitt, N. (2008). Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168808089921
Shen, Y. (2013). Balancing accuracy and fluency in English classroom teaching to improve Chinese non-English majors’ oral English ability. Theory and Practices in Language Studies, 3(5), 816-822. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.5.816-822
Sprague, J. (1993). Retrieving the research agenda for communication education: Asking the pedagogical questions that are “embarrassments to theory”. Communication Education, 42(2), 106-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529309378919
Suciu, A. I., & Mata, L. (2011). Pedagogical competences – The key to efficient education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 411-423.
Sulistiyo, U. (2016). English language teaching and EFL teacher competence in Indonesia. Proceedings of the Fourth International Seminar on English Language and Teaching (ISELT-4), Universitas Negeri Padang. (pp. 396-406).
Sundari, H. (2017). Classroom interaction in teaching English as foreign language at lower secondary schools in Indonesia. Australian International Academic Centre, 8(6), 147- 154. https://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.6p.147
Syamsinar & Jabu, B. (2015). The problems in professional competence of teachers in teaching English subject at vocational high schools. ELT Worldwide, 2 (2), 95- 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v2i2.1690
UNESCO. (2012). World data on education (7 ed.). Geneva, Switzerland: International Bureau of Education.
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to Realize Education’s Promise. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1.
Yulia, Y. (2013). Teaching challenges in Indonesia: Motivating students and teachers’ classroom language. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 1-16.
Zlatić, L., Bjekić, D., Marinković, S., & Bojović, M. (2014). Development of teacher communication competence. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 606- 610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.265