Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 12. Number3 September 2021 Pp.308-322
Teacher Electronic Written Corrective Feedback, Trends and Future Directions
Omar Abdullah Altamimi
center for Instructional Technology and Multimedia
Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malaysia
Corresponding Author: email@example.com
center for Instructional Technology and Multimedia
Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malaysia
Received: 7/21/2021 Accepted: 8/30/2021 Published: 9/24/21
The past two decades witnessed increased attention in the role of Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) in improving the English as a second language(ESL) students’ written linguistic accuracy. Several methods were suggested, including the use of the electronic means of providing corrective feedback. The electronic methods proved to be effective despite the limited numbers and contexts. However, the extent of these studies is still unknown. Furthermore, no comprehensive review of the studies had been conducted to date. This systematic literature review will identify and classify the research on providing ESL teachers with Electronic Written Corrective Feedback (EWCF). A survey of several experimental and analytical studies that focused on testing the effect of different methods of EWCF on ESL students was conducted, covering the period between 2006 and 2020. Two major groups of studies emerged from this research, and several gaps were identified. The research concluded with several recommendations regarding the potential tracks for future research on EWCF. The current research will serve as a guideline for ESL writing practitioners and researchers on future teacher corrective feedback in second language writing.
Keywords: electronic corrective feedback, ESL/EFL learners, grammatical errors, systematic literature review, written errors
Cite as: Altamimi, O. A., & Masood, M. (2021). Teacher Electronic Written Corrective Feedback, Trends and Future Directions .
Arab World English Journal, 12 (3) 308-322.
Akbar, F. S. (2017). Corrective feedback in written synchronous and asynchronous computer-mediated communication. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics & TESOL, 17(2), 9–27.
Al-saleh, N. A. (2018). Corrective feedback. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2 (4), 1–121.
Alipanahi, F., & Mahmoodi, R. (2015). Corrective feedback via e-mail on the correct use of past tense among iranian EFL learners. South African Journal of Education, 35(4), 1–19.
Bataineh, A. M. (2014). The effect of text chat assisted with word processors on saudi English major students’ writing accuracy and productivity of authentic texts. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 9(9), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v9i9.4119
Bitchener, J. (2016). To what extent has the published written CF research aided our understanding of its potential for L2 development ? International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 167(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.167.2.01bit
Orourke, B. (2012). Using eye-tracking to investigate gaze behaviour in synchronous computer-mediated communication for language learning Individual processes in SCMC. In Researching online foreign language interaction and exchange: Theories, methods and challenges (pp. 11–44).
DeBell, M. (2003). Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001. National Center for Education Statistics, US Department of Education.
Ene, E. & Upton, T (2014). Learner uptake of teacher electronic feedback in ESL composition. System, 46, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.07.011
Ene, E., & Upton, T. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005
Esfandiari, R., & Meihami, H. (2017). Impact of direct corrective feedback (dcf) through electronic portfolio (ep) platform on the components of iranian EFL learners’ writing across levels of language proficiency. Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 40(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22099/jtls.2017.24570.2204
Guénette, D., & Lyster, R. (2013a). Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre-service ESL teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 46, 80–95. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1346
Guénette, D., & Lyster, R. (2013b). Written corrective feedback and its challenges for pre-service ESL teachers. Canadian Modern Language Review, 69(2), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.1346
He, H. (2016). A survey of EFL college learners’ perceptions of an online writing program. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(4), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i04.5459
Hosseini, S. B. (2012). Asynchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback and the correct use of prepositions : Is It Really Effective ? Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(4), 95–111.
Hosseini, S. (2013). Impact of asynchronous computer-mediated corrective feedback on increasing iranian EFL learners’ correct use of present tenses. International Journal on New Trends in Education & Their Implications (IJONTE), 4(1), 138–153.
Hyland, F. (2010). Future Directions in Feedback on Second Language Writing: Overview and Research Agenda. International Journal of English Studies, 10(2), 171–182.
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39(2), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399
Kim, H. Y. (2014). Revisiting synchronous computer-mediated communication: learner perception and the meaning of corrective feedback. English Language Teaching, 7(9), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n9p64
Kim, M., & Cho, Y. W. (2016). The effects of metalinguistic and exemplar-based written corrective feedback on English verb complementation accuracy in multimedia-based EFL writing instruction. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 19(2), 34–60. Retrieved from http://10.0.61.86/mall.2016.19.2.34
Lee, J., Vahabi, F., & Bikowski, D. (2018). Second language teachers’ written response practices: an in-house inquiry and response. Journal of Response to Writing, 4(1), 34–69.
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220600803311
Lv, X. (2018). A study on the application of automatic scoring and feedback system in college English writing. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(3), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i03.8386
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001034
Maas, C. (2017). Perceptions of multimodal learner-driven feedback in EAP. Writing & Pedagogy, 9(3), 487–516. https://doi.org/10.1558/wap.33292
Martin-Beltrán, M., & Chen, P. (2013). From monologue to dialogue: A case study on mediated feedback in a transnational asynchronous online writing tutorial. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 17(1), 145–150.
Mousavi, F., & Mahshanian, A. (2016). The effect of corrective feedback strategies via e-mail on writing accuracy improvement: A case of iranian EFL learners. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 5(3), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3p149
O’Rourke, B. (2008). The other C in CMC: What alternative data sources can tell us about text-based synchronous computer-mediated communication and language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 227–251.
Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. Network-Based Language Teaching: Concepts and Practice, 59, 86.
Rassaei, E. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82, 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
Rassaei, Ehsan. (2019). Computer-mediated text-based and audio-based corrective feedback, perceptual style and L2 development. System, 82(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.03.004
Razagifard, Parisa Razzaghifard, V. (2011). Corrective feedback in a computer-mediated communicative context and the development of second language grammar. Teaching English with Technology, 11(2), 1–17.
Razagifard, P., & Rahimpour, M. (2019). The effect of computer-mediated corrective feedback on the development of second language learners ’ grammar. Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(5), 1–17.
Ribeiro, A. (2018). Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in face-to-face and computer-mediated interactions. Electronic International Journal of Education, Arts, and Science, 4(9), 42–62.
Saadi, Z. K., & Saadat, M. (2015). EFL learners’ writing accuracy: Effects of direct and metalinguistic electronic feedback. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 5(10), 2053–2063. Retrieved from http://10.0.68.99/tpls.0510.11
Samani, E., & Noordin, N. (2013). A comparative study of the effect of recasts and prompts in synchronous computer-mediated communication (SCMC) on students’ achievement in grammar. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 15(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.15.1.2274
Sauro, S. (2007). A comparative study of recasts and metalinguistic feedback through computer m ediated communication on the development of l2 know ledge and production accuracy. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of l2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 96–120. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/default.html
Shintani, N, & Aubrey, S. (2016). The effectiveness of synchronous and asynchronous written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in a computer-mediated environment. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 296–319. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12317
Shintani, N. (2015). The effects of computer-mediated synchronous and asynchronous direct corrective feedback on writing : a case study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.993400
Shintani, N., & Ellis, R. (2013). The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 286–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.011
Smith, B. (2010). Employing eye-tracking technology in researching the effectiveness of recasts in CMC. In Directions and prospects for educational linguistics (pp. 79–97). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9136-9_6
Smith, B. (2012). Eye-tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning and Technology, 16(3), 53–81.
Su, T., & Tian, J. (2016). Research on corrective feedback in ESL / EFL classrooms. Theory & Practice in Language Studies, 6(2), 439–444.
Warschauer, M. (1996). comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
Xu, Z., Banerjee, M., Ramirez, G., Zhu, G., & Wijekumar, K. (2019). The effectiveness of educational technology applications on adult English language learners’ writing quality: a meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(1–2), 132–162.