Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number1 March 2020 Pp. 376 -388
Second Language Acquisition of Quantifiers by Arabic Speakers of English: Feature
Department of English Language,Taif University
Taif, Saudi Arabia
This paper reports on an experimental study addressing second language acquisition of English quantifiers by Arabic speakers. Due to several differences found between Arabic and English regarding types, meanings and functions of quantifiers, Arabic learners encounter challenges in mastering them properly. Unlike English, Arabic does not make lots of distinctions among the different meanings that each quantifier might bear; using the same quantifier to bear two or several meanings at the same time. Arabic, for instance, does not differentiate between countable and non-countable nouns using the same modifier in contrast to English. According to the Feature Reassembly Hypothesis (Lardiere 2005, 2009; Choi & Lardiere, 2006), second language (L2) speakers must successfully reassemble existing features of their first language (L1) into the L2 feature-based sets in order to accommodate the L2 grammar. The researcher tests the validity of this prediction for the L2 acquisition of English quantifiers, which requires Arabic learners of English to remap semantic concepts of quantity onto new and different morpholexical configurations. Data from 40 L1 Arabic learners of English at different levels of proficiency and 20 native speakers who completed a picture/sentence matching task suggest that only the meanings which require different and new semantics-morphology remapping is difficult.
Keywords: Arabic quantifiers, English quantifiers, feature reassembly hypothesis, mapping
Cite as: Albaqami, R. (2020). Second Language Acquisition of Quantifiers by Arabic Speakers of English: Feature Reassembly Approach. Arab World English Journal, 11 (1) 376 -388.
Bley-Vroman, R. (1989). What is the logical problem of foreign language learning? In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 41-68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. In R. Martin et al. (eds.), Step by Step: Essays in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89-155). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Choi, M. & Lardiere, D. (2006). The interpretation of wh-in-situ in Kore a second language acquisition. In Belletti, A., Bennati, E., Chesi, C., DiDomenico, E. and Ferrari, I. (eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of GALA 2005 (pp.125-135). Cambridge Scholars Press.
Douglas, B., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conard, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.
Gil, K.H. & Marsden, H., (2013). Existential quantifiers in second language acquisition: A feature reassembly account. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 117-149.
Haznedar, B. & Schwartz, B.D. (1997). Are there Optional Infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In E. Hughes, M. Hughes & A. Greenhill (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 21 (pp. 257-268). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Hornby, A.S. (2005) Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jawad, M. (2015). Contrastive Study of Quantifiers in English and Arabic. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education 2(5), 285-308.
Lardiere, D. (1998). Dissociating syntax from morphology in a divergent end-state grammar. Second Language Research, 14, 359-375.
Lardiere, D. (2005). On morphological competence. In L. Dekydtspotter, R. A. Sprouse, and A. Liljestrand (eds.). Proceedings of the 7th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2004) (pp. 178–192). Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
Lardiere, D. (2008). Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In J.M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.). The role of formal features in second language acquisition (pp. 106-140). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lardiere, D. (2009). Some thoughts on the contrastive analysis of features in second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 25(2), 173–227.
O’Neill, R., Washburn, G. N., & Cornelius, E. T. (1981). American kernel lessons: Advanced student’s book. New York: Longman.
Rothman, J., Slabakova, R. (2017). The generative approach to SLA and its place in modern second language studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(2), 417–442.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. (1994). Word order and nominative case in nonnative language acquisition: A longitudinal study of (L1 Turkish) German interlanguage. In T. Hoekstra and B. D. Schwartz (eds.), Language acquisition studies in generative grammar (pp. 317–368). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse, R.A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72.
Schwartz, B.D. & Sprouse. R.A. (2000). When syntactic theories evolve: consequences for L2 acquisition research. In J. Archibald (ed.), Second language acquisition and linguistic theory (pp. 156–86). Oxford: Blackwell.
Slabakova, R. (2001). Telicity in the Second Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Villanueva, L.C. (1990). The role of the L1 in the acquisition and the use of the L2: new perspectives. Bells: Barcelona English Language and Literature Studies, 2, 73-79.
White, L. (1985). Is there a logical problem of second language acquisition? TESL Canada, 2, 29–41.
White, L. (2003). Second language acquisition and universal grammar. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.