Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number 4 December 2022 Pp.80-91
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.6
Review and Analysis of Theories Underlying Grammar Teaching Methodologies
Asma Alqahtani
English Language Institute
University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Email: Asma.aedh@gmail.com
Received:05/28/2022 Accepted:11/14/2022 Published:12/15/2022
Abstract:
Grammar is significant in learning other language skills, such as speaking and writing. Theories of teaching grammar in a foreign language are vital as they allow EFL teachers to build a frame for language learners. Grammar instruction is a bridge that links learners with other skills and if their grammar competence is vulnerable, the whole language production will be weak too. This study seeks to understand and review language theories that underlie daily grammar teaching. Many of EFL/ESL teachers teach grammar without a solid understanding of the language theories that inform their actual teaching practices and methodologies. This paper sheds light on the linguistics theories underlying grammar teaching methodologies in most English as foreign language classes and textbooks. It is significant for English teachers to have a basic knowledge of language acquisition theories as it directly influences their ability to provide appropriate content-area instructions.
Keywords: Behaviorism theory, Cognitivism theory, English teaching methods, grammar teaching
Cite as: Alqahtani. A. (2022). Review and Analysis of Theories Underlying Grammar Teaching Methodologies.
Arab World English Journal, 13 (4) 80-91.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no4.6
References
Al-khresheh, M., & Orak, D. S. (2021). The place of grammar instruction in the 21st century: Exploring global perspectives of English teachers towards the role of teaching Grammar in EFL/ESL Classrooms. World Journal of English Language, 11(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v11n1p9.
Al-maamari, A. A. A. H. (2021) “An Overview of Grammar Translation Method’s Effect on EFL Teaching And Learning”, IJET (Indonesian Journal of English Teaching), 10(1), pp. 26–35. doi: 10.15642/ijet2.2021.10.1.26-35.
Alissa, D., E. (2003). Behaviorism: More than a Failure to Follow in Darwin’s Footsteps. Illinois: Jossey-Bass.American History Vol (87) (2), pp. 686.
Batool, N., Anosh, M., Batool, A., & Iqbal, N. (2015). The direct method: A good start to teach oral language. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 5, 53-55.
Blyth, C. (1997). A constructivist approach to grammar: Teaching teachers to teach aspect. The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 50-66. https://doi.org/10.2307/32916 https://doi.org/10.2307/329160
Brooks, J. G. & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms, with a new introduction by the authors. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Budiman, A. (2017). Behaviorism in Foreign Language Teaching Methodology. English Franca, 1, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v1i2.171
Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/411334
Churcher, K. M. A., E. Downs, and D. Tewksbury. 2014. “‘Friending’ Vygotsky: A Social Constructivist Pedagogy of Knowledge Building Through Classroom Social Media Use.” Journal of Effective Teaching 14 (1): 33–50. http://uncw.edu/cte/et /articles/Vol14_1/Churcher.pdf.
Demirezen, M. (1988). Behaviorist theory and language learning. Hacettepe Universitesi Eğitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 3, 161-162. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/19883MEHMET%20DEM%C4%B0REZEN.pdf
Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Churcher, K. M. A., E. Downs, and D. Tewksbury. (2014). “Friending’ Vygotsky: Asocial Constructivist Pedagogy of Knowledge Building Through Classroom So-cial Media Use.” Journal of Effective Teaching 14 (1): 33–50.http://uncw.edu/cte/et/articles/Vol14_1/Churcher.pdf.
Driscoll, M.P. (1994). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Erevelles, N. (2005). Understanding curriculum as normalizing text: Disability studies meet curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(4), 421-439. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027032000276970
Hadley, A. O. (2001). Teaching language in context (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
Halliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hiep, P. H. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Unity within diversity. ELT Journal 61(3), 193-201. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm026
Johnson, K. E. & Golombek, P. R. (2020) Informing and transforming language teacher education pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 24(1): 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818777539
Jones, J. (2000). Teaching grammar in the modern foreign language classroom. In K. Field (ed.) Issues in Modern Foreign Languages Teaching .London, UK: Routledge/Falmer.
Jordan, A., Carlite O., & Stack, A. (2008). Approaches to learning: A guide for teachers. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.3316/CAR0101067
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2001). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lee, D. (2001). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University
Marlowe, B., & Page, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining the constructivist classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
McLeod, S. A. (2008). Bruner. Retrieved from http://www.simplypsychology.org/bruner.html.
Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional Design & Learning Theory. Retrieved https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242429320_Instructional_Design_Learning_Theory.
Miller, J.L. (2014). Curriculum theorizing in the throes of the audit culture. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 16(1-2), 13-30.
Mukalel, J. C. (2005). Approaches to English language teaching. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.
Oztürk, B. K. (2018). Evaluation of the grammar teaching process by using the methods used in Turkish language teaching as a foreign language: A case study. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 6(2), 278-288.
Richards, J., & Rodgers, T. (2004). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Rivers, M. W. (1968). Teaching foreign language skills. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press. Routledge.
Rummel, E. (2008). Constructing cognition. American Scientist, 96(1), 80-82. https://doi.org/10.1511/2008.69.80
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317
Sharma, M. K. (2014). The impact on consumer buying behavior: Cognitive Dissonance. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(9), 833-840.
Spada, N. (1997). Form-focused instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(02), 73-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799
Sysoyev, Pavel V. (1999). Integrative L2 Grammar Teaching: Exploration, Explanation and Expression. The Internet TESL Journal. Vol. V, No. 6. Available http://iteslj.org/Articles/Sysoyev-Integrative.html
Thompson, I. (2010). Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500279551
VanPatten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1992). A constructivist approach to teaching. Paper presented at the Alternative epistemologies Conference at the University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (Ed.). (1986). Language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wijayanit, D. (2012). The essay of Behaviorism of language teaching and learning. Retrieved from https://mydreamarea.wordpress.com/author/mydreamarea/page/2/.