Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference 2020 Pp.197-211
PgCert Student-faculty Perspectives on Online Collaborative Projects: A case from Middle
Samir Mohand Cherif
Centre for Foundation Studies
Middle East College, Muscat, Oman
Teacher online collaboration has recently attracted more and more attention and interest in many parts of the world. Unfortunately, very little research, if at all, has been conducted so far in the Sultanate of Oman. The present paper sought to fill this severe gap in research by asking and finding answers to this central question: What beliefs and opinions do faculties hold towards online collaborative projects (OCPs)? It used a quantitative method approach through a questionnaire administered to a group of PgCert student-faculty group (n=50) from Middle East College to get to know about their perspectives concerning the questions set above. The results obtained revealed (a) a high positive feedback on the part of the study participants as to their involvements in online collaborative projects, (b) very different reports on issues faced when working on online collaborative projects, and (c) varying degrees of impacts of OCPs on their teaching practices. The results of the study will have tremendous significance to teachers in all fields of specialization who are/will be engaged in OCPs. The potential implications of these and other results on teacher practices and involvement in such OCPs are discussed.
Keywords: Online Collaborative Projects (OCPs), PgCert student-faculty, teacher beliefs and practices, teacher professional development
Cite as: Cherif, S. M. C. (2020). PgCert Student-faculty Perspectives on Online Collaborative Projects: A case from Middle East C197-211 college. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Proceedings of 2nd MEC TESOL Conference,2020:197-211.
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of ecological science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 23(3), 213-227.
An, H. & Kim, S. (2007). The perceived benefits and difficulties of online group work in a teacher education program. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(5). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/May_07/article01.htm
Ansari, J. A. N., & Khan, N. A. (2020). Exploring the role of social media in collaborative learning the new domain of education. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-16.
Baker, K. Q., & Moyer, D. M. (2018). The relationship between students’ characteristics and their impressions of online courses. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1555301
Barab, S. (2004). EDUC R695 Building online communities. Retrieved from https://sashabarab.org/course/educ-r695-building-online-communities/
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
Birnbaum, B. W. (2001). Foundations and practices in the use of distance education. Lewiston, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
Bolkan, S. (2015). Intellectually stimulating students’ intrinsic motivation: The mediating
influence of affective learning and student engagement. Taylor & Francis 28(2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2014.962752
Bovill, C., Felten, P. & Cook-Sather, A. (2014). Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (2): Practical guidance for academic staff and academic developers. International consortium on educational development conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 16–18 June.
Brindley, J., Blaschke, L. M., & Walti, C. (2009). Creating Effective Collaborative Learning Groups in an Online Environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675
Cockerill, M., Craig, N., & Thurston, A. (2018). Teacher Perceptions of the Impact of Peer Learning in their Classrooms: Using Social Interdependence Theory as a Model for Data Analysis and Presentation. International Journal of Education and Practice, 6(1), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2018.61.14.27
Cohen, L., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th ed.).
Coventry University’s Academic Development (2020). Postgraduate certificate in academic practice in HE (PgCAPHE). Coventry University, UK. Retrieved from https://acdev.orgdev.coventry.domains/accredited-courses/PgC-APHE
Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M. & Burchett, R. (2002). How does technology influence students’ learning? Learning & Leading with Technology, 29 (8), 46-50. Retrieved from http://educ116eff11.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/44935610/Article.StudentLearning.pdf
Curtis, D. D. & Lawson, M. J. (2001). Exploring collaborative online learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(1), 21-34. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ847776.pdf
Davies, W. M. (2009). Group work as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. High Education, 58(4), 563-584. Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/education-portfolio/ei/assessmentresources/pdf/Link10.pdf
Dirkx, J. M. & Smith, R. O. (2004). Thinking out of a bowl of spaghetti: Learning to learn in online collaborative groups. In T. S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 132-159). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Educause (2010). Seven things you should know about assessing online team-based learning. Educause. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli7063.pdf
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language
Learning, 54(2), 227-275.
Ellis, T. J. & Hafner, W. (2008). Building a framework to support project-based collaborative learning experiences in an asynchronous learning network. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 4, 167- 190.
Freedman, T. (2009). Working together internationally. Knowledge Quest, 37 (4), 56-60.
Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2 (2-3), 87-105. Retrieved from http://cde.athabascau.ca/coi_site/documents/Garrison_Anderson_Archer_Critical_Inquiry_model.pdf
Graham, A. (2019). Benefits of online teaching for face-to-face teaching at historically black colleges and universities. Online Learning, 23(1), 144-163. doi:10.24059/olj.v23i1.1435
Ha L, Jeroen J, Theo W (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education 48(1):103-122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1259389
Han, S. Y., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service Teachers’ Implementation and Understanding of STEM Project-Based Learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 11(1), 63-76. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
Harasim, L. (2012). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. New York/London: Routledge.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2018). Qualitative research methods (2nd Ed). Los Angles: Sage Publishers.
Hron, A. & Friedrich, H. F. (2003). A review of web-based collaborative learning: Factors beyond technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 70-79.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. (2013). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25 (3-4), 85-118. Retrieved from http://personal.cege.umn.edu/~smith/docs/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Research, 38 (5), 365–379. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X09339057
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. (2nd ed., pp. 785–811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college. Change, 30, 26-35.
Kalaian, S. A., & Kasim, R. M. (2017). Effectiveness of various innovative learning methods in health science classrooms: a meta-analysis. Advances in health sciences education: Theory and practice, 22(5), 1151–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-017-9753-6
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 (1278), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4228829/pdf/fpsyg-05-01278.pdf
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V, & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krauss, J. & Boss, S. (2013). Thinking through projects: Guiding more in-depth inquiry through project-based learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: A review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335–353. Retrieved from https://www.ou.nl/Docs/Faculteiten/OW/Identifying%20the%20pitfalls%20for%20social%20interaction%20in%20computer.pdf
Kuhlthau, C., Maniotes, L., & Caspari, A. (2015). Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century, 2nd Edition. Retrieved from http://publisher.abc-clio.com/9781440833823
Latané, B., Williams, K. D. & Harkins, S. G. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Perspectives of Social Psychology 37(6), 822-32.
Lundberg, C. & Sheridan, D. (2015). Benefits of engagement with peers, faculty, and diversity for online learners. College Teaching, 63 (1), 8–15. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/87567555.2014.972317?journalCode=vcol20
Middle East College (2015). Strategic Plan (2015-20). Muscat, Oman: MEC. Retrieved from http://portal.mec.edu.om/docs/MEC_Strategic_Plan.pdf
Nayir, F. (2017). The relationship between student motivation and class engagement
levels. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 71, 59–77. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2017.71.4
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Patton, A. (2012). Work that matters: The teacher’s guide to project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.innovationunit.org/sites/default/files/Teacher’s%20Guide%20to%20Project-based%20Learning.pdf
Pollard, H., Blevins, R., Connor, M. & McGovern, L. (2013). An examination of the relationship between teaching presence, social presence, learner motivation, and Self-reported learning among online MBA students. Journal of American Academy of Business, 18 (2), 23-30. Retrieved from http://www.21caf.org/uploads/1/3/5/2/13527682/wilson-hrd-conference_proceedings.pdf
Porcaro, D. (2011). Reviewing the literature of computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) to determine its usefulness in Omani education development. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 7 (3), 102-120.
Porcaro, D., & Al-Musawi, A. S. (2011). Collaborative knowledge building in an Omani teacher-training class: Lessons learned. Paper presented at 55th Annual Conference of the Comparative & International Education Society, Montreal, Canada.
Rourke, L., Andersons, T., Garrison, R. & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14 (2), 1-18. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.553.8650&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Srichanyachon, N. (2014). The barriers and needs of online learners. Turkish Journal of Distance Education, 15 (3), 50-59. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/983-published.pdf
Stripling, B., Lovett, N. & Macko, F. L. (2009). Project-based Learning: Inspiring Middle School Students to Engage in Deep and Active Learning. New York, USA: Department of Education.
Thomas, W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Retrieved from http://www.ri.net/middletown/mef/linksresources/documents/researchreviewPBL_070226.pdf
Thomas, D., & Brown, J. S. (2011). A New Culture of Learning: Cultivating the Imagination for a World of Constant Change. Seattle, WA: Create Space.
Tims, N. R. (2009). Project-based learning (PBL) in adult English as a second language (ESL) programs: Students’ perspectives, (Published doctoral dissertation). New Mexico State University.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weinberger, Y., & Shonfeld, M. (2020). Students’ willingness to practice collaborative learning. Teaching Education, 31(2), 127-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2018.1508280
Xie, K., Hensley, L. C., Law, V., & Sun, Z. (2019) Self-regulation as a function of perceived leadership and cohesion in a small group online collaborative learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12594
Yamagata-Lynch, L.C. (2014). Blending online asynchronous and synchronous learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15 (2), 189-212. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1030098.pdf
Yang, Y-F. & Wu, S-P. (2011). A collective case study of online interaction patterns in text revisions. Educational Technology & Society, 14 (2), 1-15.
Zheng, J. (2017, May). Teaching Business Translation-A Project-based Approach. In 3rd Annual International Conference on Management, Economics, and Social Development (ICMESD 17). Atlantis Press.
Zhang, Y. (2013). Power distance in online learning: Experience of Chinese learners in U.S. higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14 (4), 238-254. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1017526.pdf