Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number4  December 2020                                           pp. 207-222
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.14

 Full Paper PDF

 

 

Perception of the English Phonotactics by Saudi English Majors: A Comparative Study

 

Awad H. Alshehri
 Department of English Language and Literature
College of Languages and Translation, IMSIU, Saudi Arabia

 

 

Abstract:
This paper investigates the perception of phonotactics by Saudi English majors, beginners and advanced. Due to the significance of pronunciation of consonant clusters, which are almost absent from Arabic, this work attempts to find the extent to which beginner and advanced English majors accept or reject permissible and impermissible sounds combinations in the onset position. It also attempts to find whether there are any intervening factors that could influence students’ perception of English phonotactics. The focus was on the consonant clusters occurring in onset position. These clusters included two-sound and three-sound clusters starting the word. Most of the words were pseudowords, and the focus was on whether the students would accept or reject these sounds, and whether there was a significant difference between beginner and advanced students, male and female. The paper also considered some intervening factors that could have influenced students’ performance. To this end, the researcher conducted a survey to test the perception and rejection of certain sounds in some carefully selected pseudowords. The findings showed that most advanced students scored better in permissible sounds while the results were close in the impermissible sounds. There were some factors that could have had some impact on the results, such as living in an English-speaking community, watching English TV, and listening to the news in English. Suggestions for further research would include sounds in the coda position.
Keywords: English phonotactics, impermissible combinations, onset, permissible combinations, Saudi English majors.

Cite as: Awad H. Alshehri, A. (2020). Perception of the English Phonotactics by Saudi English Majors: A Comparative Study.  Arab World English Journal11 (4) 207-222.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.14

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249-306.

Al-Saidat, E. M. (2010). Phonological analysis of English phonotactics: A case study of Arab learners of English. The Buckingham Journal of Language and Linguistics, 3, 121-134.

Al-Shuaibi, A. (2009). Phonological analysis of English phonotactics of syllable initial and final consonant clusters by Yemeni speakers of English. Language in India, 9(11), 195-328.

AlFeneekh, A. H. (1983). Non-phonetic prerequisites to phonological rules. University of Washington.

Barros, A. M. d. V. (2003). Pronunciation difficulties in the consonant system experienced by Arabic speakers when learning English after the age of puberty.

Bernard, A. (2017). Novel phonotactic learning: Tracking syllable-position and co-occurrence constraints. Journal of memory and language, 96, 138-154.

Candlin, C., & Mercer, N. (2001). English language teaching in its social context: A reader: Psychology Press.

Celata, C., & Basilio, C. (2015). Introduction to phonotactics: Cross-linguistic perspectives from acquisition, speech production and corpus studies.

Chiswick, B. R., & Miller, P. W. (2007). The economics of language: International analyses: Routledge.

Crystal, D. (2004). The Cambridge encyclopedia of the English language: Ernst Klett Sprachen.

DeKeyser, R. M. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning, 63, 52-67.

Eckman, F. R. (1985). Some theoretical and pedagogical implications of the markedness differential hypothesis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(3), 289-307.

Ehrlich, S. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation: New York, Oxford University.

Goldrick, M. (2004). Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 586-603.

Halicki, S. (2010). L2 Knowledge of Target Phonotactics: Learner Judgments of French Re-suffixation. Paper presented at the Selected Proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum.

Hammond, M. (2004). Gradience, phonotactics, and the lexicon in English phonology. International Journal of English Studies, 4(2), 1-24.

Hayes, B., Siptár, P., Zuraw, K., & Londe, Z. (2009). Natural and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel harmony. Language, 822-863.

Hayes, B., & White, J. (2013). Phonological naturalness and phonotactic learning. Linguistic inquiry, 44(1), 45-75.

Hernández, M., Costa, A., & Arnon, I. (2016). More than words: multiword frequency effects in non-native speakers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(6), 785-800.

Iverson, G. K., & Salmons, J. C. (2005). Filling the gap. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(3), 207-221.

Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive psychology, 21(1), 60-99.

Kaufman, S. B., DeYoung, C. G., Gray, J. R., Jiménez, L., Brown, J., & Mackintosh, N. (2010). Implicit learning as an ability. Cognition, 116(3), 321-340.

Krugman, H. E., & Hartley, E. L. (1970). Passive learning from television. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 184-190.

Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers: Univ of Michigan Pr.

Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice, 2(12), 59-67.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned 4th edition-Oxford Handbooks for Language Teachers: Oxford university press.

Miellet, S., & Sparrow, L. (2004). Phonological codes are assembled before word fixation: Evidence from boundary paradigm in sentence reading. Brain and language, 90(1-3), 299-310.

Murphy, J. M. (1991). Oral communication in TESOL: Integrating speaking, listening, and pronunciation. Tesol Quarterly, 25(1), 51-75.

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning: Cambridge University Press.

Onishi, K. H., Chambers, K. E., & Fisher, C. (2002). Learning phonotactic constraints from brief auditory experience. Cognition, 83(1), B13-B23.

Pater, J., & Tessier, A.-M. (2006). L1 phonotactic knowledge and the L2 acquisition of alternations. Inquiries in linguistic development: Studies in honor of Lydia White, 115-131.

Rahuman, M. (2017). A study of mother tongue influence on learning English as a second language by Tamil speaking students.

Smolensky, P., & Prince, A. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Optimality Theory in phonology, 3.

Souza, H. K.-d. (2017). The relationship between phonotactic awareness and pronunciation in adult second language learners. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 17(1), 185-214.

Underwood, J. (2002). Language learning and interactive TV.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.14
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Dr. Awad Hajran Alshehri is an assistant professor of applied linguistics from Saudi Arabia. He
holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics from University of Limerick, Ireland. In addition to teaching
at the College of Languages and Translation, he is the Vice Dean for accreditation and ranking
since August 2017. He has published research papers on syntax, phonetics and phonology in
different journal. ORCID iD https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3937-2413.