Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 12. Number1  March 2021                                         Pp.  90-112
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7

Full Paper PDF 

 

Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies on Second Language Vietnamese Undergraduates 

Hieu Manh Do
Department of English Language, Hong Bang International University
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam
Correspondent Author: domanhhieubc@gmail.com 

Huong Le Thu Phan
Department of English Language, Hong Bang International University
Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

 

Received: 12/17/2020    Accepted: 2/13/2021                  published: 3/24/2021

 

Abstract:
Metacognitive awareness is considered a crucial factor in reading comprehension. In the present study, the quantitative research method was applied using descriptive statistics, T-test, and ANOVA to identify: (1) What is second language (L2) Vietnamese students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies? (2) Are there any significant differences between male and female L2 Vietnamese students in metacognitive awareness of reading strategies? (3) Are there any significant differences between good, medium, and poor L2 Vietnamese readers in metacognitive awareness of reading strategies? One hundred and twenty-three English-majored undergraduates of Hong Bang International University completed an online survey which discovers their frequencies of using problem-solving, global, and support reading strategies. They next took a comprehension test on the TOEIC format test, whose results were adopted to classify students into three levels, namely good, medium, and poor readers. Reading strategies usage mean scores were compared across three strategy types and these scores were collated between groups. Results showed; first, reading strategies were used in academic texts at medium frequency level with the high usage of problem-solving strategies, followed by medium usage of support and global reading strategies. Second, female readers showed a higher frequency of using support strategies than males did. Third, learners’ proficiency levels were found to predict the levels of metacognitive awareness in reading with high-reading-ability students applying reading strategies more frequently than poor-reading-ability ones. This is significant to indicate that instructors should integrate all three reading strategies in their teaching, especially, raising awareness of global and support reading strategies among Vietnamese learners.
Keywords: Metacognitive awareness, reading strategies, second language, Vietnamese undergraduates,
reading comprehension, Survey of Reading Strategies

Cite as:   Do, H. M., &  Phan, H. L. T . (2021). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies on Second Language Vietnamese Undergraduates.
Arab World English Journal, 12 (1) 90-112  .
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7

References

Arrastia, M. C., Zayed, A. M., & Elnagar, H. Z. (2016). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) preservice teachers: An exploration of gender and developmental differences. International Research in Higher Education1(2), 46-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5430/irhe.v1n2p46

Auerbach, E., & Paxton, D. (1997). “It’s not the English thing”: Bringing reading research into the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 237–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3588046

Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. Tesol quarterly20(3), 463-494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3586295

Brown, A. ( 1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Fitrisia, D., Tan, K. E., & Yusuf, Y. Q. (2015). Investigating metacognitive awareness of reading strategies to strengthen students’ performance in reading comprehension. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education30(1), 15-30.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). “Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving”. In L. Resnick (Ed.). The Nature of Intelligence (pp.231-236). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Iwai, Y. (2011). The effects of metacognitive reading strategies: Pedagogical implications for EFL/ESL teachers. The Reading Matrix 11 (2), 150, 159.

Jacobs, J. E., & Paris, S. G. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3-4), 255-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052

Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An Overview. Available at: http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.htm, Eriúim Tarihi: 24.06.2009.

McNamara, D. S. (Ed.). (2007). Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies. Routledge, Psychology Press. 

Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching9(3), 117-129. DOI: 10.5539/elt.v9n3p117

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of educational psychology94(2), 249-259. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of developmental education25(3), 2-11.

Mokhtari, K., Dimitrov, D. M., & Reichard, C. A. (2018). Revising the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory (MARSI) and testing for factorial invariance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 219-246. DOI: 10.14746/ssllt.2018.8.2.3

Nguyen, T. M., & Trinh, L. Q. (2011). Learners’ metacognitive strategy use and reading comprehension: Insights from a Vietnamese context. Journal on English Language Teaching1(1), 9-19.

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). System23(1), 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(94)00047-A

Pammu, A., Amir, Z., & Maasum, T. N. R. T. M. (2014). Metacognitive reading strategies of less proficient tertiary learners: A case study of EFL learners at a public university in Makassar, Indonesia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences118, 357-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.049

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33

Rajoo, F. X. A., & Selvaraj, B. (2010, December). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Proceedings from the 2010 International Conference on Science and Social Research (pp. 1301-1304). Retrieved from http://xplorebcpaz.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5773739

Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In metacognition in learning and instruction (pp. 3-16). Springer, Dordrecht.

Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychological Review, 7, 351-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02212307

Scoot, B. M. (2008). Exploring the effects of student perceptions of metacognition Across Academic Domains. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Indianapolis, IN: Graduate Faculty of the Indiana University.

Sheorey, R., & Baboczky, E. (2008). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among Hungarian college students. Reading strategies of first-and second-language learners, 161-173.

Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System29(4), 431-449.

Temur, T. U. R. A. N., & Bahar, O. Z. G. E. (2011). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of Turkish learners who learn English as a foreign language. European Journal of Educational Studies3(2), 421-427.

Tobias, S., & Everson, H. T. (1996). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. College Board Report No.96-01. New York: The College Board. http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/pdf/RR%2096-1.PDF, Eriúim Tarihi: 10.05.2009.

Wilson, J. (1998). Assessing metacognition: Legitimizing metacognition as a teaching goal. Reflect, 4(1), 14-20.

Wu, L., Valcke, M., & Van Keer, H. (2012). Validation of a Chinese version of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies inventory. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research12, 117-134.

Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences31, 894-898. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164

 

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
Received: 12/17/2020
Accepted: 2/13/2021  
Published: 3/24/2021   
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no1.7
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Hieu Do is a Lecturer in the Department of English Language at Hong Bang International University, Vietnam. He got MA TEFL at National Chung Cheng University, Taiwan in 2019. His main interests include English for Specific Purposes (ESP), English for Academic Purposes (EAP), Corpus Linguistics, and English language skills. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7780-263X

Huong Phan is a lecturer in American and British literature in the Department of English Language at Hong Bang International University, Vietnam. She earned her MA in TESOL and Applied Linguistics from Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK. Her main research interests are in the area of second language acquisition (SLA), specifically metacognitive awareness, task-based interaction, collaborative writing and written corrective feedback. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2859-3576