Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 12. Number4 December 2021 Pp. 446-461
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no4.29
Investigation into Common Errors in English Writing among Non-Academic
Staff at a Malaysian Public University
Ahmad Taufik Hidayah Abdullah
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
Mohd Nazri Latiff Azmi
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
Isyaku Hassan
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
Engku Suhaimi Engku Atek
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
Correspondence Author: esuhaimi@unisza.edu.my
Zailani Jusoh
Faculty of Languages and Communication
Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia
Received: 10/3/2021 Accepted: 12/5/2021 Published:12/15/2021
Abstract:
The Malaysian government has long recognized the significance of mastering the English language among its citizenry. The government has planned, and subsequently, implemented many policies to ensure Malaysians master the English language. Although civil servants have a strong desire to master the English language to perform their duties more efficiently, poor English communication skills have become a major concern in this regard. Therefore, this research aims to investigate common errors in writing the English language among non-academic staff at Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), a public university in Malaysia. The study employed an Error Analysis approach by conducting document analysis where every respondent was required to write a paragraph in the English language in about 150-200 words on the topic“My greatest challenge as a UniSZA officer”. The findings revealed that a sizeable number of non-academic staff committed different types of errors in writing the English language, including errors related to subject-verb agreement, passive voice, plurality, choice of word, omission of word, use of article, tense sequence, word ordering, gerund, addition of word/redundancy, and comparison of adjective. It was observed that lack of linguistic skills, lack of exposure, and inadequate practices in written English were the main factors contributing to the English writing errors among the non-academic staff. These findings could help the university management to develop appropriate programs that can assist the non-academic staff to develop English writing competence. However, this study is limited to English writing errors. Further research may focus on other language skills such as speaking and listening.
Keywords: English language, common error, Malaysian public university, non-academic staff, writing, UniSZA
Cite as: Abdullah, A. T. H., Azmi, M. N. L. , Hassan, I., Atek, E. S.E., & Jusoh, Z.(2021). Investigation into Common Errors in English Writing among Non-Academic Staff at a Malaysian Public University.
Arab World English Journal, 12 (4) 446-461.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no4.29
References
Abdullah, A.T. H. (2013). Error analysis on the use of the simple tense and the simple past tense in writing essays among TESL college students. International Journal of Education And Research, 1 (12), 1-12.
Bartram, M., & Walton, R. (2001). Correction: A positive approach to language mistakes. Language Teaching Publication: London: Longman
Corder, S.P. (1981) Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corder, S.P. (1974) The significance of learner’s errors. In J.C. Richards (ed.), Error Analysis (pp. 19-27). Singapore: Longman
Edge, J. (1994). Mistakes and corrections. New York: Longman
Ellis, R. (1998). Second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Hassan, I., Abdul Rahaman, A. M., & Latiff Azmi, M. N. (2021). Development of English writing skills through blended learning among ESL learners in Malaysia. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 377-389. doi: 10.24093/awej/call7.26
Heydari, P., & Bagheri, S.M. (2012). Error analysis: Sources of L2 learner’s errors. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 2 ( 8), 1583-1589. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.8.1583-1589
Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28, ( 2), 200-207.doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01582.x
Kirkgoz, Y. (2010). An analysis of written errors of Turkish adult learners of English. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 4352-4358.doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.692
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Li, Z. (2021). Error Analysis–Types and Causes of Errors in English Writing among Chinese Students. Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 5(8), 238-241. doi: 10.26689/jcer.v5i8.2487
Lightbown, P.M., & Spada, N. (2006). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahadi, T.S.T, Ambigapathy, P., & Kaur, S. (2019). Investigating the role of English language in a Malaysian public university: The case of administrative and support staff. Retrieved from: https://www.malrep.uum.edu.my/monograph
Mashoor, B. B. N., & Abdullah, A. T. H. (2020). Error analysis of spoken English language among Jordanian secondary school students. International Journal of Education and Research, 8 (5), 75-82.
Muftah, M., & Galea, S.R. (2013). Error analysis of present simple tense in the interlanguage of adult Arab English language learners. English Language Teaching, 6, ( 2), 146-154. doi: 10.5539/elt.v6n2p146
Özkayran, A., & Yilmaz, E. (2020). Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(2), 48-58.doi.10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.2‑p.48
Richards, J. C. (1984). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. London: Longman
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2011). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.