Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 13. Number2.  June 2022                                            Pp.140-156
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.10

  Full Paper PDF

 

Investigating the Legal Discourse of Bill Clinton’s Impeachment Trial 

Bader Nasser Aldosari
 Business Administration Department
College of Science and Humanities
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia
E-mail: Bn.aldosari@psau.edu.sa

 

 Received:  3/14/2022                   Accepted: 4/10/2022                          Published:6/24/2022

 

 Abstract:
This paper presents a legal discourse analysis of Bill Clinton’s impeachment trial held in 1998. The paper’s main objective is to explore the different meanings communicated by the dexterous use of some lexical and pragmatic strategies used by discourse interlocutors involved in the trial. More specifically, the article offers a linguistic study of the testimony and statements of President Bill Clinton relating to his impeachment trial. The paper focuses on three main analytical dimensions: word selection, power relations, and questioning and answering, and the way these strategies influence the discourse participants’ conversational performance in the selected trial. To this end, this study draws on a legal discourse analysis approach as discussed by Coulthard (2013) and Mey (2016), focusing on lexicalization, the notion of power, and the use of questions and answers in courtroom settings. The overarching research question is: What are the different ideological and pragmatic meanings targeted beyond the use of selected words during the trial? Results reveal that language is a powerful tool in courtroom testimonies as it helps to extract information, verify evidence, draw legal outcomes, and encode and/or decode the underpinning meanings of courtroom discourse participants. These, in turn, serve to support or defy evidence and ultimately lead to issue a legally just decision.
Keywords: Clinton, courtroom, ideology, impeachment trial, legal discourse

Cite as:  Aldosari, B N.  (2022). Investigating the Legal Discourse of Bill Clinton’s Impeachment Trial .
Arab World English Journal, 13 (2). 140-156.
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.10

References

Aldosari, B. N. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of Nelson Mandela’s defense
speech I am prepared to die. Arab World English Journal, 11 (2) 3-17. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.1

Aldosari, B., & Khafaga, A.  (2020). The language of persuasion in courtroom discourse: A computer-aided text analysis. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 11(7), 332-340. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2020.0110744

Berukstiene, D. (2016). Legal discourse reconsidered: Genres of legal texts. Comparative Legilinguistics, 28, 89-117.

Bhatia, V.  K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.

Bhatia, V. K.,  & Gotti, M. (Eds.) (2015). Arbitration discourse in Asia. Peter Lang: Bern. https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-0351-0884-2

Breda, V. (2017). The grammar of bias: Judicial impartiality in European legal systems. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 30(2), 245-260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-016-9489-2

Cheng, L., & Danesi, M. (2019). Exploring legal discourse: a sociosemiotic (re)construction. Social Semiotics, 29(3), 279-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2019.1587841

Clinton’s Impeachment Trial (1998). Testimony and Statements of President William Clinton Relating to his Impeachment Trial. Available at https://www.famous-trials.com/clinton/883-clintontestimony

Cotterill, J. (2003), Language and power in court: A linguistic analysis of the O.J. Simpson trial, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Coulthard, M. (ed.) (2013). Advances in spoken discourse analysis. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203200063

Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2007).  An introduction to forensic linguistics.  London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969717

Eades, D. (2000). I don’t think it’s an answer to the question: Silencing Aboriginal witness in court. Language in Language, 29(2), 169-195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500002013

Fairclough, N. (2013). Language and power (2nd ed.). London & New York: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250

Farinde, R. O. (2009). Forensic linguistics: An introduction to the study of language and the law. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.

Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

Gupta, G. (2022).The Debate on ‘One Nation, One Language’. International Journal of Language &Law, 11, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.14762/jll.2022.001

Hale, S. (1997). The interpreter on trial: Pragmatics in court interpreting. In Silvana E. Carr, Roda P. Roberts, Aideen Dufour & Dini Steyn (Eds.) The critical link: Interpreters in the community (pp. 201-211). John Benjamins.

Karasev, A.,  Savoskin, A., &  Chufarova, E. (2020).  The language of law: concepts and specifics. European Proceedings of  Social and Behavioural Sciences, 86,  733-739. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.04.02.86.

Khafaga, A. (2017). Linguistic manipulation of political myth in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(3), 189-200. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n3p189

Khafaga, A. (2019). Linguistic representation of power in Edward Bond’s Lear: A lexico-pragmatic approach to critical discourse analysis. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6), 404-420. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v9n6p404

Khafaga, A. (2021). Exploring ideologies of function words in George Orwell’s Animal Farm. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(3), 2089-2111. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.3.30

Khafaga, A. (2022). Caught on page! Micro and macro pragmatics of stage directions parentheticals in Tom Stoppard’s Professional Foul. Journal of Pragmatics, 193, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.005

Mead, R. (1985). Courtroom discourse. Birmingham: University of Birmingham Printing Section.

Mey, J. (2016). Discourse, interests, and the Law: Some pragma-legal reflections. International Journal of Legal Discourse, 2 (1): 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2017-0004

Riner, C. (2020). Language and the law. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. Wiley Online Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786093.iela0211

Schaffner, C. (2004). Political discourse analysis from the point of view of translation studies.  Journal of Language and Politics, 3(1), 117- 150. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.3.1.09sch

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Spasov, B. P. (2016). Law and Its Interpretation. Moscow: Legal Literature.

Stygall, G. (2012). Discourse in the US courtroom. In P. Tiersma, & L. Solan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and law (pp. 369-380). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0027

Tessuto, G. (Ed.). (2016). Constructing legal discourses and social practices: Issues and perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Tiersma, P.  M. (1999). Legal  language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Williams, C., & Tessuto, G. (Eds.) (2013). Language in the negotiation of justice: Contexts, issues and applications. Farnham: Ashgate.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Tumblr
Reddit
Email
StumbleUpon
Digg
Received: 3/14/2022 
Accepted: 4/10/2022 
Published: 6/24/2022
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol13no2.10

Bader Nasser Aldosari is an Assistant Professor, Head of Business Administration Department, College of Science & Humanities, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. He got his PhD degree in Law Studies at School of Law, Politics and Sociology at the University of Sussex, UK, in 2018. His research interests include law studies, law and politics, and legal language.
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-6912