Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume 11. Number3  September 2020                                     Pp.  294 -304
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.18

Full Paper PDF 

 

Investigating EFL Learners’ Awareness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies
of Students in Different Disciplines
  

 Ruhina Mustajab Ahmed
English Language Centre, Higher College of Technology,
Muscat, Sultanate of Oman

 

 

 

Abstract:
This research explores the awareness and use of cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies of Omani EFL (English as a Foreign Language) students studying different disciplines. The participants were three hundred and seventy-five Omani EFL first year diploma students studying biology, business, information technology, engineering, and English in a higher education institution in Oman. The study compared and contrasted strategy use across disciplines and examined the relationships among strategy preferences and discipline. Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS), a self-report questionnaire by Mokhtari and Sheorey (2002) was used to collect data. Statistical and descriptive analysis indicates that Omani EFL learner’s most preferred category of reading strategies was cognitive strategies, followed by support strategies and metacognitive strategies. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) revealed no significant differences between students of the disciplines mentioned above in terms of strategy preferences for metacognitive, cognitive, and support strategies. The findings provide insight for curriculum developers and teachers towards the strategy preferences of Omani EFL students.
Keywords: cognitive strategies, metacognitive strategies, Omani EFL learners, reading strategies

Cite as: Ahmed, R. M. (2020). Investigating EFL Learners’ Awareness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Students in Different Disciplines. Arab World English Journal11 (3) 294 -304 .
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.18 

References

Afflerbach, P. (1998). Reading assessment and learning to read. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all:
Issues in teaching and learning
 (239–263). New York: Guilford Press.

Akyel, A., & Erçetin, G. (2009). Hypermedia reading strategies employed by advanced learners of English
System37(1), 136-152.

Alami, M. (2016). Cross-gender comparison of metacognitive strategies utilized by Omani students in reading
comprehension classes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature5(4), 20-28.

Al Seyabi, F., & Tuzlukova, V. (2015). Investigating EFL reading problems and strategies in post-

basic schools and university foundation programmes: A study in the Omani context. Malaysian
Journal of ELT Research
11(2), 17.

Amer, A., Al Barwani, T., & Ibrahim, M. (2010). Student teachers’ perceived use of online reading

strategies. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT6(4), 102-113.

Awadh, A. A. (2003). Language Learning Strategies of Omani Secondary School Graduates

 Enrolled in the First Year at Sultan Qaboos University (Unpublished MA Dissertation

 Oman: Sultan Qaboos University.

Baker, L. (2008). Metacognitive development in reading: Contributors and consequences. In
Mokhtari & R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second-

language learners: See how they read (25- 42). Norwood, MA:Christopher-Gordon.

Brantmeier, C. (2002). Second language reading strategy research at the secondary and university levels:
Variations, disparities, and generalizability. The Reading Matrix2(3).
http://readingmatrix.com/articles/brantmeier/article.pdf

Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional

science26, 97-112.

Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. & Liberto, J. (1989). ‘Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading’, TESOL Quarterly 23 (4), 647–678.

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, England: Longman.

Commander, N. E., Ashong, C., & Zhao, Y. (2016). Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategiesby Undergraduate US and Chinese Students. Journal of College Literacy and Learning.42, 40.

Dabaghi, A., & Akvan, M. (2014). Explore the Relationship between Strategy Use and ESP Reading Test Performance of Two University Majors (Humanities vs. Science). Theory & Practice in Language Studies4(1).

El-Kaumy, A. S. A. K. (2004). Metacognition and reading comprehension: current trends in theory

and research. ED490569. Available at www.eric.ed.gov.

Maarof, N. and Maasum, TNRTM (2012). Empowering ESL Readers with metacognitive reading

strategies. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences69,1250-1258.

Magogwe, J.M.(2013). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies of University of

Botswana students of different academic reading proficiencies. Reading and Writing 4(1), 1-8. DOI: 10.4102/rw.v4i1.29

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (Eds.). (2008). Reading strategies of first-and second language   

learners: See how they read. Christopher-Gordon Pub.

Mokhtari,K. & Sheorey,R.(2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies.

Journal of Developmental Education25, 2-10.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies.
Journal of Educational Psychology94(2), 249.O ‘Malley, J.M. & Chamot, A.U. (1990).
Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies

worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the Strategy Inventory for Language

Learning (SILL). System23(1), 1-23.

Park, Y. (2010) Korean EFL college students reading strategy use to comprehend authentic expository

/ technical texts in English (Doctoral Thesis). University of Kansas.

Peacock, M.& Ho, B.(2003) Student language learning strategies across eight disciplines.

International Journal of Applied Linguistics13, 179-198.

Santrock, J. W.(2008). Education Psychology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension.

Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2

readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1-23.

Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading

strategies among native and non-native readers. System29, (4),431-449. DOI: 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2

Sheu, C.M., P.L.Wang, and Hsu, L.(2013). Investigating EFL learning strategy use, GEPT

performance, and gender difference among non-English major sophomores at a technological university.
The Asian EFL Journal 15 (1), 128-164.

Taber, K. (2017). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research

Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on tumblr
Tumblr
Share on reddit
Reddit
Share on email
Email
Share on stumbleupon
StumbleUpon
Share on digg
Digg
https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.18
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on linkedin
Share on tumblr
Share on digg
Share on email
Share on reddit
Share on stumbleupon
Share on vk

Dr Ruhina Mustajab Ahmed has an EdD in Education from University of Exeter. She is a
lecturer at the Higher College of Technology in Muscat, Oman. Her area of interest is second
language acquisition. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2783-7615